Wrestling Books
Related Subjects: Backyard Wrestling Amateur Traditional Professional
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250

Used price: $5.10

A written struggleReview Date: 2008-02-13
Fabulous, glorious bookReview Date: 2007-12-29
A Challenging Call to Non-ViolenceReview Date: 2007-03-18
I don't want to ruin too much of this book, but allow me to say that Brimlow tackles Just War theory before moving to terrorism and, of course, World War II and "the Hitler Question". Brimlow challenges our assumptions of what counts as successful and the ways in which we're called to holiness.
All in all, this is a fantastic book. I *highly* recommend it.
Brave WorkReview Date: 2006-11-27
The question posed by the title is meant to confront the Christian with the ultimate test of the call to nonviolence, namely, nonviolence in the face of ultimate evil - Hitler. On his way to answering to answering this question, Brimlow tackles the doctrine of "just war." In his analysis, Brimlow finds the criteria set forth to justify a "just war" to be too flaccid and easily malleable to justify even the most immoral "unjust" war. Brimlow also finds the theologicial justifications set forth by Augustine, Thomas Aquinas and other theologians as consequentialist which do nothing more than weigh the costs and benefits and advocate an "ends over means" mentality.
Brimlow also addresses Michael Walzer's contribution of the supreme emergency" as a refinement of the "just war" theory. According to Walzer, "supreme emergency" is defined by two criteria: "the imminence of the danger and the second with its nature." For a "supreme emergency" to arise, the danger of the threat must be imminent and the nature of the threat must be "immeasurably awful." If such a supreme emergency arises, moral and philosophical concerns are trumped and man must do whatever is necessary to confront this ultimate evil and the rights of neutrals, innocents and noncombatants can under the right circumstances be overridden. However, in overriding the rights of innocents in the supreme emergency, Walzer asserts, "when we override them we make no claim that they have been diminished, weakened or lost."
Brimlow finds incoherent Walzer's assertion that it can be both right and wrong to kill innocents in the case of a supreme emergency. Brimlow does not do much to rehabilitate Walzer's construction of a "supreme emergency" though one gets the impression by reading the text that Brimlow could easily do so. Indeed, one need only to analogize the "supreme emergency" as a wildfire in order to better understand Walzer's meaning. A wildfire begins in the forest consuming the trees. In order to save the rest of the forest (humanity, civilization, etc.), the firefighters (those responding to the "supreme emergency") create "firebreaks" which consist of chopping down trees to cut the fire off from the rest of the forest. By cutting down the trees (the innocents), the firefighters save the forest.
Brimlow chooses not to rehabilitate Walzer in the way I did above because doing so is inconsequential to his ultimate thesis which is, "we must live faithfully; we must be humble in our faith and truthful in what we say and do; we must repay evil with good; and we must be peacemakers. This may also mean as a result that the evildoers will kill us. Then, we shall also die" (151). Moreover, if a "supreme emergency" arises it is the result of our failure to heed the call to nonviolence; in short (and to modify a line from Billy Joel), we DID start the fire.
There is much that is troubling in this trying work not the least of which begins with the title. If, as the title suggests, we live in an evil world, one is confronted by the probability that evil will continue to triumph over good and one's efforts at living in a way that Brimlow is advocating will likely not have a positive outcome. Brimlow shows that our focus on outcomes is misplaced but in so doing also shows that the call to nonviolence is as much an article of faith as it is an intellectual belief.
Brimlow's work is searching and insightful and is relevant to the events of today. Though it seems like a bitter pill to swallow, there is also a glimmer of hope in what Brimlow has to say. Though I may not necessarily agree with everything that Brimlow writes in "What About Hitler", I hope I am the better for having read it.
Soul-searching, yet incompleteReview Date: 2007-10-09
We have an example of an activist Christian pacifism that worked during World War II: the village of Le Chambon, in Vichy France. (See Lest Innocent Blood Be Shed.) Yet, even it worked under the shelter of a war against Nazi Germany. Nonetheless, I don't want to deny the courage or power of a community that takes Jesus' words to turn the other cheek seriously.
The difficulty I have with Brimlow's book is that it doesn't really address the best argument for the "just war": love. I imagine a Rwandan Tutsi asking me, why did we not come and help? How can I respond with "turn the other cheek"? Does not our love for our neighbor demand that we do something about their peril? Though he only hints at it, Brimlow also undermines the use of a state's police powers to restrain evil. Yet, Paul seems to suggest that the state is ordained by God to do just that. If a non-Christian governor is allowed to restrain evil through his/her police powers, can a Christian do any less? Similarly, if a non-Christian is allowed to defend his/her people, should not a Christian do so as well? I feel as if I'm willing to be persuaded to Christian pacifism, but I still need to hear answers to these questions.
I also would quibble with Brimlow's characterization of Augustine, whose experience of evil (the fall of Rome, the seige of Hippo) was far from academic. His monumental City of God was not, in the end, a defense of a church-state alliance, but just the opposite: should the City of Man fall, the City of God continues...history is still in God's hands. That's actually very close to Brimlow's own conclusion.
I recommend this book to all those struggling with pacifism or just war theology in Christian context.

Used price: $26.90

GREAT BUY!Review Date: 2008-06-10
Spiritual and humor rolled into oneReview Date: 2008-05-13
You may think that a person that is helping you to rely on God and using humor that you don't think is funny may be just wrong or blasphemy but remember this, Laughter is the language of the Soul.
God and Gansta wrapped up in a fattie...you gotta hit dis mayne!Review Date: 2008-05-29
Stories of Hobo-tats leads to getting what you want? Sign me up!Review Date: 2008-05-28

Used price: $1.03

A GREAT LOOK AT WWE IN THE 1980'SReview Date: 2008-04-13
Best book on wrestling I've seenReview Date: 2007-09-06
It begins with a chronology, encompassing great photos and events for for easy reference.
A great gift for anybody interested in wrestling.
Amazing bookReview Date: 2007-08-08
Perfect way to educate younger fans about the stars of the 80sReview Date: 2007-08-06

Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $16.01

Heart-gripping and soul-baring with a message of hope.Review Date: 2007-01-15
Night Wrestling: Struggle for Answers and Finding GodReview Date: 2002-06-21
Easily read, spiritually moving, thought provokingReview Date: 1998-10-22
PowerfulReview Date: 1999-12-13

Used price: $3.96
Collectible price: $21.95

Collectibles and Then SomeReview Date: 2000-06-17
Great reference material and fun to read as well!Review Date: 2000-06-15
Book ReviewReview Date: 2000-06-11
Professional Wrestling Collectibles is a keeper!Review Date: 2000-07-10
The book also covers some of the history of wrestling and is a great book for novices and long-time collectors. There are great photos of some of the older collectibles that I have only heard about. My favorite chapters were the ones on the action figures, trading cards and autographs, which make up a large part of my 15+ year collection.
The prices listed are average, however, the value of the items in this market change so rapidly, that its hard to give a set value on some items. 5 stars to Mr. Pope and Mr. Whebbe for tackling such a huge task.


Michaels superkickReview Date: 2003-03-15
Shawn MichaelsReview Date: 2003-03-15
Michaels superkickReview Date: 2003-03-15
Michaels book is a champReview Date: 2002-01-21

Used price: $3.97

Enthralling, ConstantlyReview Date: 2001-12-29
All Beef, No FIllerReview Date: 2001-12-29
An external journey of your inner self...Review Date: 2001-12-28
An external journey of your inner self...Review Date: 2001-12-22

Used price: $30.00

Very informative, especialy like the parts on Philosophy.Review Date: 1999-01-02
Well organized guide, covering all aspects of the sport.Review Date: 1999-03-07
Reccomended to all coachesReview Date: 1999-03-09
Wrestling Coach's Survival Guide:Review Date: 2000-02-07

This is by far the most comprehensive guide to the subjectReview Date: 2005-05-02
Timeless ResourceReview Date: 2000-11-11
Skills and Principles of the sport. Biographies and picturesReview Date: 1998-10-15
There's a reason this book was so well received!Review Date: 2002-01-01
The book is thick, and full of info. Yes, it has old photos of wrestlers and styles from history and around the world. Yes, it has tips and recommendations on weight lifting. Yes, it addresses diet and nutrition. Yes, it delves into physiology and the basis behind much of its suggestions. (Key example: getting stronger increases your conditioning. You can wrestle a 150-lbs. opponent harder and longer than a 175-lbs. opponent. So if the 175-lbs. opponent *feels* like a 150-lbs. opponent, you've indirectly extended your conditioning.) If you don't feel you need all that the book offers, that's certainly no reason not to acquire it; simply save the unwanted portions for later (and if you're active in the sport, eventually you'll need most of what's in here.)
This book is a classic, and upon reading it you quickly understand why the training methods it teaches work. "They don't make them like they used to" certainly applies here.
Five stars for historical value, detail, sound methodology, and abundance of useful material on numerous aspects of training.

Used price: $26.00

A scholarly analysis of three theological frameworksReview Date: 2002-10-05
An examination of faith, doubt, and belief in Jesus ChristReview Date: 2002-09-07
Viewing Doubt ConstructivelyReview Date: 2001-07-02
Wrestling with Doubt explores three major thinkers who have tried to explin the relationship between faith and doubt: Cardinal Newman, Karl Barth and Paul Tillich. The discussion of these leads to the conclusion that the relation of doubt and faith is essentially a theological question-understood only by considering the nature of God. Evidence for this approach is found in the life story theologies of Harry Williams and Val Webb. Then Frank Rees offers his own account of the God of the Bible as "God the Conversationalist." This God is seen to ask real life questions about personal responsibility, social ethics, as well as religious questions.
The book suggests that the life of faith is a 'journey' of believing and doubting, protesting and exploring, and many other elements-not an intra-individual state but a shared adventure of the self, others and God.
The book is written in a way which provides scholars with many resources of interest, yet is clearly accessible to 'ordinary' souls who continue to wrestle with doubt. It doesn't give us an 'answer'but a possible way to live with our questions.
Viewing Doubt ConstructivelyReview Date: 2001-07-02
Wrestling with Doubt explores three major thinkers who have tried to explin the relationship between faith and doubt: Cardinal Newman, Karl Barth and Paul Tillich. The discussion of these leads to the conclusion that the relation of doubt and faith is essentially a theological question-understood only by considering the nature of God. Evidence for this approach is found in the life story theologies of Harry Williams and Val Webb. Then Frank Rees offers his own account of the God of the Bible as "God the Conversationalist." This God is seen to ask real life questions about personal responsibility, social ethics, as well as religious questions.
The book suggests that the life of faith is a 'journey' of believing and doubting, protesting and exploring, and many other elements-not an intra-individual state but a shared adventure of the self, others and God.
The book is written in a way which provides scholars with many resources of interest, yet is clearly accessible to 'ordinary' souls who continue to wrestle with doubt. It doesn't give us an 'answer'but a possible way to live with our questions.
Related Subjects: Backyard Wrestling Amateur Traditional Professional
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
Brimlow takes his writing very personal, and throughout the book much of his reflections or comparisons resonate from stories of his experiences. Sandwiched between each chapter, you will also find a min-chapter, or "Meditation" where he openly reflects upon passages of the Bible and difficulties that he (and many Christians, particularly pacifists) deal with.
I really enjoyed the fact that he expounded a little on Emmanuel Levinas' writings (and his concept of the Other), something I've been waiting for since reading about Levinas in an ethics class.
Not much directed at Hitler in the book, despite the title, and Brimlow explains why, he mostly focuses on the difficulties faced in the titled question, giving great consideration for writings by just war enthusiasts, and tackles them with honesty and prose.
Not a 'light' read.