Articles Books

This is a very good book and gives a solid over view to the workings of a campaign, especially for those that do not have loads of money. It also gives a good understanding about the elections process that seems mystical/complicated to the average voter.

Of particular interest was the fact that the author actually has run an elections department as Chief Elections Officer as I am worry of "Experts" that offer advice without having done it or experienced it.

Good Read for anyone considering running for office!

Excellent opportunity to get several of DuBois' Works under one cover and at one price.

This book is a "must read" if you have any sense of adventure, love of Alaska or if you enjoy an amazing true love story that you can't put down. It's a book that I read well over a year ago and think of often.

Agent McAuliffe provides truly profound reflections on leadership in this short article. He provides you with the direction and guidance to look deep within yourself to improve your own leadership skills.

Edward Alexander explains that a favorite cause of many academics is to support Arab terror against Israel. Arguments in favor of this stance based on justice or human rights are manifest nonsense. But we see that some academics find ways to rationalize all this. And, as Martin Peretz has said, the reason why this barbarism has such support is that the targets are Jews.

The author gives Martin Jay (a professor of history at the University of California, Berkeley) as an example of this replacement of scholarship by anti-Jewish propaganda. Jay says that antisemitism is indeed resurgent. But he blames it mostly on Ariel Sharon, "fanatical settlers," and, as Alexander puts it, those Jews who "protest the antics of tenured guerillas on the campuses."

It seems to me that no matter what Jews do, the Arab antizionists try to attack their rights. In my opinion, those who ask what the Jews should do differently would be better off asking what the opponents of Jewish rights should do differently. If these opponents of Jewish rights were willing to live in peace with their neighbors, everyone might be much better off.

Alexander shows how Jay finds suicide bombing of Israeli Jews to be just as counterproductive and stupid as Israeli action against suicide bombers. As the author says, "As always with Jay, cause and effect are reversed, as if the actions of firefighters were to be blamed for the depredations of arsonists." He's right. What Jay is saying is nonsense. And statements about terror and reaction to terror being equivalent are not an argument, but a caricature of an argument which I feel is used just to take up space and to pretend that something coherent has been written.

Congratulations are due to Alexander for exposing Jay's complicity in making antisemitism "academically respectable."

You'll see no atrocities here, but you'll feel the effect of the greatest atrocity, the Nazi regime. This is also the story of friendship, accomplishment, courage, and ageing.

I am a minister and this data was quite helpful in working with marriage and families.

As this article states, a large Israeli peace camp was willing to make major compromises. But this willingness did not lead even to a bogus peace agreement at Camp David or Taba, let alone a genuine one. Well, what went wrong?

In my opinion, there was no peace because the true Arab demand was to abolish Jewish rights in the Middle East. That demand could not be met simply by changing a few borders. It could be supported by making Israel weaker, or by getting some anti-Israeli lies accepted. But it would be sabotaged were Arabs to formally make peace with Israel and leave it on the map.

Some folks decided to say that whatever the reasons for the failure of the peace talks, it must have been Israel's fault. That is absurd, given that Israel was the party that needed peace, not the Arabs. This article summarizes what some of those who blame Israel say, and it rebuts them.

One of those Margalit quotes who refuses to blame the Arab side is Ron Pundak. Pundak laments that the Arabs were "'in a political-psychological state of utter despair.'" However, Margalit notes that the violence starting in September of 2000 took place after unprecedented Israeli offers to concede land, even it the Israeli capital of Jerusalem. That violence did not take place under the Netanyahu administration but under Barak's.

The author concludes that any genuine peace agreement has to maintain Israel's character as a Jewish state, "in accordance with the Wilsonian principle of respect for every nation's right to self-determination." In addition, "Israel's security needs must be given priority." And that the failure of Arabs to agree to this (rather than, say, the Jewish towns in the West Bank) has been the problem.

I'd go further than this. I think a peace agreement has to have some connection to truth, justice, and human rights. It has to ensure that it is consistent with all humans in the region having rights to life, liberty, and property. Still, I recommend this short article. It shows just how unreasonable the arguments are which blame Israel, not the Arabs, for the unprovoked Arab attacks on Israel in 2000.

Only few pages but worth reading for people who sell electric tools. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp is a company who sells very good products for fire station, police station and military. This brand has a good reputaion in Poland and Europe.

At a time when many folks are thinking about growing their own food - partly because of increasing cost, and partly because of safety concerns - this article was quite helpful. It's written in plain language, easy to understand and covers all the basics of growing garlic. And the fact that this author was a beginner, made it even more appealing to me. I'd love to see similar articles about growing other vegetables.