Simmons Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250

Timeless ThrillerReview Date: 2008-06-26
Novel great, reviews so-soReview Date: 2005-08-13
There are four or five interesting ideas, such as: westerns like Shane may reflect American foreign policy in the 50's and 60's, the western heroes like Shane are Christ (with six-gun) figures, sort of old testament-new testament hybrids, the author could not write such an innocent story again, because of his cynicism about what the "homesteaders" eventually did to America (his politics are unclear and he seems to blame Babbitt and not the oil barons), the novel first person is an older son looking back at his childhood with Shane instead of the movie's first person protagonist being the young boy, and, the other really good western is The Gunfighter. The obvious oedipal projection, which no reviewer but me has noted, is vivid in the film and only hinted at in the novel.
It is too bad for those of us who have seen the movie first; we can only compare, and can't see the novel's images free of Alan Ladd and Jack Palance. The movie could have been better (maybe with Randloph Scott after intenstive acting lessons, or Palance instead of Ladd) since Shane was written as a super-humanly lethal and fearsome man. But, Ladd gives the right voice to the character, and with the special effects the movie works.
Shane is "pure" western myth. (It was always a myth, there never were any such characters in the west except in 19th century newspapers and tabloids.) There are only white Nothern European Christian men and few wives and kids; no Mexicans, no African-Americans, no Native Americans, no dance hall girls, not even any cripples. But the novel and the movie try to answer the essential question raised in every good western: what price will you will pay for the most expensive of American luxuries: fairness, justice and honor.
If you are fascinated by the film Shane, as I am, the critical edition of the novel is worth taking a look at.
An essential editionReview Date: 2003-06-08


VIDEO MAGICReview Date: 2006-10-26
Kimberly Lange is a junior in High School. She knows she wants to become a cinematographer after graduation, and she's applied for a position as an intern on the annual senior videography club project. She approaches everything in life with single-minded determination and always chooses the fastest means to an end. She remains oblivious to the effect of her own actions on those surrounding her, and harbors a deep jealousy of her older, over-achiever brother, Bobby. In her eyes, they have been locked in competition from the moment she was born.
Greg Winters is the senior in charge of the videography project. He knows the value of preparation and is methodical in his approach to life--the complete opposite to Kimberly, which leads to complications, confrontations, and ultimately, to a friendship that develops into a budding relationship, despite their differences.
Kimberly's best friend, Carol, develops a case of the "green eyed monster" when Kimberly becomes involved not only with Greg and the video project, but also finds a new friend in Marla, once a rival for the internship. Kimberly finds herself in turmoil at every turn as she becomes estranged from Carol, gets into hot water with Greg and Mr. Jeffries, teacher and sponsor of the video club for overstepping her bounds and making rash promises to the Principal, and has to deal with her brother, home for a visit and undermining her confidence at every opportunity.
Kimberly learns lessons throughout this book, controlling her impulsivity and finding fulfillment in becoming part of team. She discovers that winning isn't the ultimate victory she once thought it was, and finding love involves giving as well as receiving.
Simmons shows the pitfalls not only of jealousy but rivalry. The students of this second book in a series about Northrupp High School are struggling to complete projects, prepare for future careers and manage their personal lives. The pressures of modern-day life are clearly reflected in choices made and decisions that could dog these characters long after they leave high school.
Lovers of romance will find satisfaction here, as Kimberly and Greg find more than the video project occupying their thoughts. Their characters evolve with the plot, and as the stakes grow higher, they become people the reader will root for until the last, satisfying page.
Pure enjoymentReview Date: 2006-07-09
Video MagicReview Date: 2006-01-05
Author Vikk Simmons captures the feeling of teenage angst expertly in this short young adult novel. With the progress of the video project as a baseline, the heroine has many enlightening learning experiences throughout the story, most of them in interpersonal dynamics. Kimberly learns that it's possible for someone to have hidden facets that explains their past behavior, and experiences turmoil in her relationship with her best friend Carol. She faces her jealousy of her older brother and his achievements, and learns that her impulsiveness can get her into a lot of trouble. And she finds out that, by working together, a team can accomplish amazing things.
I was very impressed with the plotting and writing style of this author, who keeps the action moving swiftly, and carefully resolves all plot lines by the end of the novel. The characters were very real to this reader as I remembered my experiences in high school -- so much rests on each event! The speed with which events happen at this age is highlighted by the author in the fast plot that never stops. I think this is a wonderful novel for teens, and I quite enjoyed it. -- Jean, Fallen Angel Reviews (courtesy of Fallen Angel Reviews)


Hooray for Clint Bolick and School Choice!Review Date: 2003-09-24
To say that poor, inner-city students in Cleveland were not receiving a quality education would be like saying that Michael Jordan is good at basketball. The school district did not meet any of the 18 performance standards set for it, and only one in ten 9th graders could pass a basic proficiency exam. In 1995, three years after I graduated from high school, a federal judge placed the school district in state receivership.
The Ohio state legislature subsequently enacted the Cleveland Scholarship Program to provide scholarships and tutoring assistance to children residing in the Cleveland City School District. The program allows both private and public schools in adjacent districts to accept scholarship students by lottery, with low-income students receiving priority if the number of applicants supercedes the number of scholarships, while participating schools agree not to discriminate on the basic of race, religion, or ethnic background.
In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Cleveland's scholarship program, giving a huge victory to poor students longing for a quality education and poor parents who want them to have a chance at a better future. Attorney Clint Bolick and his outstanding legal team helped to make school choice a legal sanctioned reality.
In "Voucher Wars," Bolick recounts his 12-year roller coaster ride to give disadvantaged schoolchildren a chance at a better future. That struggle began with the nation's first school choice program in Milwaukee, Wisconsin in 1990 and culminated with the 2002 Supreme Court decision in Zelman. He shows how the teachers' unions time and again threw up legal challenges to oppose school choice even though most union members enroll their own children in private schools.
Bolick notes that the Ohio federal court injunction against the Cleveland scholarship program that was overturned by the Supreme Court would have snatched 4,000 scholarship students out of quality charter and magnet schools and placed them back into failing public schools before the 1999-2000 school year began. He calls the teachers' union support for the injunction "a strategic miscalculation of titanic significance."
The High Court's ruling was a big thumb to the eye of school choice opponents - most notably the politically powerful National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers. They still seem willing to condemn poor - and mostly minority - children to educational cesspools just to maintain their status quo stranglehold on public education.
While Bolick points out there is still much more to be done, this books tells an emotional and uplifting story of a high-stakes battle that he helped to win. It is an excellent read.
As usual, Clint Bolick knows what he's talking aboutReview Date: 2003-06-28
Examining landmark educational casesReview Date: 2003-05-15

Used price: $1.77

Hilarious!Review Date: 2006-12-23
How Much Money Does it Take to Make a Princess Happy?Review Date: 2006-11-30
but what I do know is that it doesn't cost a lot of money to get lots of laughs from this book. The
perfect gift for any one you know who is either a princess or is aspiring to be one.
Princess Jokes, Quotes and Witty Humor in an Original Format! Review Date: 2006-11-23

Used price: $4.99

Good Network Geek StuffReview Date: 2001-06-04
Great for administratorsReview Date: 2001-01-24

Used price: $0.53

Yum, Yum: I get hungry just looking at the picturesReview Date: 2003-07-15
Bar ManyReview Date: 2000-05-17

Good analysis but ideology sometimes gets in the wayReview Date: 2007-02-17
Like many (or most) economists, they assume that behavior in markets its ethically better than behavior in politics. On the one hand, that's a useful corrective for those people who think that politics consists of the noble pursuit of the public interest. On the other hand, this sort of economist unrealistically idealizes the market.
For example, Chapters 5-10 all have the same title - "Political Pursuit of Private Gain" - with different subtitles. Mitchell and Simmons act as if pursuing private goals through the political system is odd or reprehensible. Yet they would applaud people who pursue private goals through the market. It's not at all clear to me that there is an ethical distinction to be made here. Shouldn't the problem of the public and private good in both economics and politics be the real subject of political economy?
As another example, they count as "perverted incentives" the fact that politicians aks "how many people" want something, not "how badly do they want something" (which is what the market does). Is it so obvious that one of these two standards is better than the other?
I'll conclude with a final example. Mitchell and Simmons assume uncritically that defense, law and order are truly public goods. If they had thought more carefully about dictatorships, they would see ways in which law and order can be private goods, paid for by taxpayers. Even if national defense is public (which I doubt), it is produced by contractors that receive private benefits from its production. They might also think about what makes some politicians run for office on law and order or defense platforms.
It's not obvious to me what the answer is, but I think the method here could be helpful when applied in a nonpartisan, nonideological way that recognizes imperfections in both politics and economics. Mitchell and Simmons don't quite achieve that.
Explaining Government FailureReview Date: 2000-06-09
Simply put, transferring an issue from the market to government does not eliminate self-interested behavior. Those who have the most at stake will make the necessary effort to have the most influence. Government policies frequently confer large benefits on a small number of people, while spreading the costs among many. Those many, therefore, each have too little at stake to make large investments in influence. The result is rent-seeking - the economists' term for using government to create markets that are distorted in favor of producers.
The other crucial problem with government policymaking is that decision-makers do not have to compare costs and benefits and make economically wise decisions. In fact bureaucrats have a strong incentive to overstate the magnitude of problems and to avoid seeking real solutions, because doing so allows them to continue to request funding - thus creating job security.
My view is, of course, somewhat biased, because I am Bill Mitchell's student. But knowing him personally, I also know that his intent is not to demonize government employees (who are all acting rationally in response to the distorted incentives they face). Nor is he a right-winger intent on helping businesses oppress consumers and destroy the environment. In fact the best parts of the book, in my opinion, are the chapters showing how the incentive structure in government results in policies that actually hurt consumers and the environment.
Parts of this book are easy to read, but other parts, including the opening chapters, are likely to be difficult for anyone without some background in economics. If the book has one flaw, it is that the authors assume the reader will understand the more technical terms. The book is brief enough that they could have easily included vivid examples to make the meanings clear.
Nevertheless, this book is by far the best available on the problem of government policy failure. Most are either interminably long and academically complex, or shallow and polemical. This book is that rare blend of true intellectual analysis in a readable format.


In the Chandler traditionReview Date: 2008-10-28
The action is mostly in Seattle, giving LA, Boston and Miami a rest. The plot hangs together and there is enough action to keep the pages turning.
I look forward to the next effort from Mr. Zeigler.
Harry Simmons: a definite cut aboveReview Date: 2008-10-24
An old friend of mine, knowing that I like off-beat humor and a good murder mystery (difficult to find under one cover), not to mention insights into Seattle culture (which are sprinkled throughout BLUE like gold nuggets) sent me a copy of this new novel with the words "must read" on an attached Post-it. I took it on a recent trip to British Columbia and began this wonderful read on a two hour ferry crossing through the Gulf Islands. I was really irritated when the boat approached the Duke Point landing and I had to stuff the book into my back pack. (I'm sure the passengers around my wife and me wondered what the heck was so intriguing.)
Written with a big dose of crime noir, just like Sam Spade or Phillip Marlowe, BLUE'S primary character Harry Simmons is a wise cracking, half-cynical, half-romantic, first-person narrative detective (actually Harry's an insurance adjustor). And he's very lucky with the ladies, I might add.
With BLUE, Zeigler has masterfully crafted a well researched Seattle based novel. The many fascinating story tangents are supported by the author's high octane and sometimes bizarre imagination. This is perhaps first realized in a scene toward the beginning of the book where a gorgeous young client of Harry's named Ramona meets up with a polygamous Mormon elder named Ezra, who is planning to wed her. Is Ezra ever in for a shocker!
One neat little touch throughout the book is the smattering of "Editor's Notes," which are oddly pertinent to the story, and which only a history buff with an encyclopedic mind for obscure trivia could conjure up. But I guess these "notes" are understandable, given that the author's bio says he is a history teacher (retired). I bet his classroom lectures were filled with digressions that students, in a state of disbelief, went home to google for factualism. Not a bad teaching technique.
Most readers of contemporary murder mysteries know of a worn Seattle based detective (no names) who has, well frankly, gotten a bit old (hint: think J.P., and I don't mean J.P. Patches the Seattle clown). If you liked that old S.P.D. cop, you will love Harry Simmons, who for my money is a definite cut above. I can't wait for the next episode!

Used price: $14.00

My first color bookReview Date: 2008-02-29
Great Reference BookReview Date: 2006-08-28
When you are stuck, this may get you out of the jam :)

Review from an undergraduate student.Review Date: 2000-03-29
The first section of the book, which includes the first five papers, introduces the history of cryptography and addresses isues which are which still persist like asymmetric key cryptography and DES/AES.
The following sections address issues which are are only now coming to public attention. With the emergence of e-commerce worries of privacy, authentication, and non-repudiation strikes fear into the heart of the vulnerable customer. However, these ideas are long in contemplation and have been for almost a decade. These papers acknowledge the difficulties which lie ahead.
As an undergraduate student I liked this book for its mixture of information. The history component is eye opening and interesting, while discussions of the future are at times scary. Although the mathematics in this book were not trivial, with study they can become fascinating. This book is a true learning experience, especially in this day and age.
Great for serious readers with a suitable backgroundReview Date: 2001-08-26
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
I mostly bought the critical edition for its cover. Having read the extra material, Shane's historical, literary and cinematic context and a nifty talk with the author, I'm glad I did!