Clayton Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250

From a conquerer's perspective/ INACCURATEReview Date: 2008-05-22
Seminal Work on Little CrowReview Date: 2002-12-03
The main thesis of Anderson's "Kinsmen of Another Kind" was the importance of kinship ties within the Dakota tribes as well as with outsiders. Traders formed kinship ties with the Dakota because the ties allowed the traders to use the Dakotas to gather furs for them. Dakotas benefited from kinship ties because the ties involved gift giving. Whites had to give gifts to the Dakotas if they wanted to maintain trade and relations. As more and more whites moved into the region, kinship ties slowly disintegrated because whites no longer needed to deal with the Dakotas on an equal basis. It is important to understand these kinship ties when reading "Little Crow," as Anderson again makes these relationships central to his study.
Anderson begins his biographical analysis of Little Crow with an overview of Dakota culture. According to Anderson, it is impossible to understand anything about Little Crow's life and actions unless we understand his cultural underpinnings. Anderson discusses hunting, gift giving, medicine sacks and medicine societies, Dakota religion, and the role of a chief in Dakota society (chiefs, according to Anderson, held little actual power over the warriors; it was the position of speaker that held greater power, something Little Crow found out when he led the Dakota warriors during the 1862 uprising).
Little Crow's life is truly fascinating. Anderson discusses in great depth the role of Little Crow's grandfather and father in their relations with the Americans at Fort Snelling. Little Crow's grandfather and father took an accommodationist stance towards white encroachment on Dakota lands, trying to toe the fine line between keeping the Dakota people happy while dealing with the whites. Anderson argues that Little Crow, despite the bad reputation he earned due to the uprising, was an accommodationist just like his father and grandfather. Time and time again, Little Crow worked with the white Indian agents and soldiers to try and benefit his people. Little Crow was intimately involved in signing several treaties with the government, worked hard to placate the government after the Inkpaduta affair of 1857, and tried to prevent war in 1862. That Little Crow failed in his dealings with the government and failed to stop the uprising is certainly a tragedy, but should not overshadow his attempts to do the right thing for his people. Ultimately, no Dakota leader could have prevented the coming doom.
Little Crow is best known for the destructive war against whites in 1862. Anderson covers the war and its aftermath in succinct detail. Actually, this may be the best account of the war I have read. Anderson discusses Little Crow's failure to successfully organize his warriors, his failure to gain support with mixed-blood and Upper Agency Indians, and his failure to form an Indian alliance during his exile in North Dakota and Canada. When Little Crow returned to Minnesota in 1863, he knew his time was short. Little Crow died from a gunshot wound while picking berries with his son. Little Crow's remains, horribly mutilated by angry whites, ended up on display at the Minnesota Historical Society until the 1970's, when they were finally given a proper burial.
Anderson claims that Little Crow was an opportunist, a scheming sort of politician who always helped out because he wanted to elevate his own position within Dakota society. Anderson cites as evidence newspaper interviews with Little Crow which revealed Little Crow's propensity for pithy statements and his need for constant attention. That Little Crow had a knack for oratory should come as no surprise; he was a chief, and chiefs constantly debated issues with other leaders in the tribe. But is Little Crow a politician? I don't think so, at least not in the way we perceive the term. Is it possible that newspaper and other white accounts of the time framed Little Crow in terms whites understood? After all, documents show that many whites had no real conception about the true nature of Indians in the 19th century. White relations with Indians were based on a fundamental set of assumptions, most of them racist and false. To paint Little Crow as a sort of Huey Long type teeters dangerously close to error. After all, Dakota culture emphasized communitarian values, not the sort of individualistic elevation Anderson says Little Crow sought.
Anderson ends the book with an appendix discussing Little Crow's genealogy. This section is the most difficult part of the book due to the intricate relationships within Indian families and tribes. Terms like "father" and "cousin" do not carry the same connotation in Indian culture as they do in ours. A father's brothers can all be "fathers" to an Indian, and "cousins" are even more convoluted. A genealogical chart of Little Crow's family at the back of the book makes a medieval royal house look like a nuclear family. These genealogies are necessary to back up Anderson's claim that kinship is central to tribal life.
This is a scholarly book that manages to entertain while it teaches. It is definitely a must have for those seeking a deeper understanding of the Dakota tribes, or for those interested in the Minnesota uprising of 1862. If you don't come away with some sense of admiration for Little Crow, despite his failures, you did not read the same book I did.
The Life & Times of Little Crow, Spokesman for the DakotaReview Date: 1997-11-21
The Dakota people had suffered treaty abuses for many years, losing vast tracts of land with each treaty. The many treaties made between the Dakota Nation and the United States were soon broken. Money promised by treaty never made it intact to the Dakota people, being siphoned off by greedy merchants and military personnel. The small sums which finally arrived late were never enough to cover the inflated prices set by the traders. Those same traders tricked the Dakota people into signing papers which forced the available monies directly to the traders pockets, bypassing the Dakota people entirely.
Speculators were selling off parcels left and right before the treaties were even signed. With encroachment, the natural dynamics of the land were destroyed, ruining the traditional hunting and gathering places. With no traditional food sources available, the Dakota were forced to buy from the traders.
One fatal year, during the Civil War, the treaty monies were extremely late. The traders would not allow the abundant food in the storehouses to be distributed without payment in hand. The people were starving. Desperate men, worried about their families, took matters into their own hands to liberate the food stored in the warehouses.
The Dakota went to war, up & down the Minnesota river valley forcing the inadequate army through it's paces. Individual warriors went on raids against the local settlers while the majority of the warriors organized themselves into war parties against the army.
Hundreds of Dakota warriors were tricked into surrendering as prisoners of war and imprisoned. Their families were impounded in miserable stockades. Those warriors who could, took their families and fled to Canada and the plains.
The Minnesota settlers demanded that all the warriors be summarily executed. The mock military trial comdemned any man who had participated in the war to death. Of the hundreds of men captured, 38 were hanged in Mankato in a mass execution the day after Christmas. The remaing warriors were imprisoned for up to five years before being released. Their families were shipped out to Crow Creek in South Dakota where they died of starvation and disease.
Little Crow was blamed for starting the War and a price put on his head. He had escaped to Canada, but had come back at a later time with his son. They were picking berries when some settlers saw them and shot Little Crow.
Little Crow was dead. His body was mutilated and his bones were kept in the Minnesota Historical Museum collections for far too many years.
Smooth read, good scholarship, realistic, compassionate.Review Date: 2001-03-03
This is the tragedy of Little Crow's life.
Faithful to the conclusions suggested by his richly varied sources, Anderson presents a realistic yet compassionate portrayal of a great Mdewakanton chief. This is a scholarly work that reads smoothly and gives good tapestry detail. Colored plates of paintings enrich the text.
Nancy Lorraine, Reviewer
No longer just a nameReview Date: 2000-02-27
Our city has a bronze statue of Little Crow looking out over the Crow River near the dam on the Main Street. Up until the time that I read this book, that summed up most of what I knew of Little Crow, the Sioux legend. We choose to drop the name Sioux that was given this people by our own ancestors, the Ojibwe. In our language it means "Snake". Their word for themselves is Dakota. It means "Friend".
Now I feel as though I know him as a man. I know of his character, his integrity, his family, his people. I know a great wrong was done.
At the present time there is a group of people involved in planning and hosting a reconciliation and restitution concerning the events that touched this city in regards to Taoyateduta (Little Crow) and his people. A direct descendant of Taoyateduta (meaning His Red Nation) and a direct descendant of the man who shot him will be part of the event, asking forgiveness of one another. It is never too late to say, "I'm sorry. Will you forgive?"
This book has been instrumental in opening the door to the healing of this ancient wound that is still alive in many hearts.


Pleasurable!Review Date: 2003-05-16
Kendra Clayton mystery is a hit!Review Date: 2003-04-02
A Reading Pleasure!Review Date: 2003-03-31
A pleasure of a bookReview Date: 2002-11-09
That�s what Friends are forReview Date: 2003-05-11
Henry has done a good job introducing Kendra Clayton to the literary scene. The book is well developed and keeps the reader perplexed until the ending. I look forward to the next installment of a Kendra Clayton mystery.
Reviewed by Robilyn Heath
The RAWSISTAZ Reviewers

Used price: $1.99
Collectible price: $21.99

Truth about subjects many people fear: GREAT READ!Review Date: 2002-09-29
I felt this book. I don't feel prose this way often!Review Date: 2002-09-27
One Good Read!Review Date: 2001-02-03
A PAGE-TURNER WITH POETRY DISGUISED AS PROSEReview Date: 2001-02-10
Stunning debut novel by a wise new voice in American fictionReview Date: 2001-01-27
"Until the Dawn" alternates between very different places (primarily Tupelo, Mississippi, and New York City) and times (early to late 20th century), piecing together a fascinating and gritty story of the art world. As an artist, a Southerner, and a former New Yorker, Clayton knows these worlds well. But what makes this book special is the...well...FEROCITY with which it is written. It is incredibly evocative, at times shocking and at times charming and beautiful - and it all rings true.
Clayton attacks our society's foolish and tragic ills (including racism and homophobia) head-on in a richly politically-incorrect manner. It is a wonderful debut novel by a wise new voice in American fiction. As a librarian, I can assure all librarians that many a library patron will be delighted if you add this to your shelves.

Used price: $19.95

Answered all my questions!Review Date: 2000-04-23
A Great GuideReview Date: 2001-01-22
better than nothingReview Date: 2003-01-26
Michael Joy
chicagomoldschool.com
Answered all my questions!Review Date: 2000-04-22


Great for sources, subpar and analysis and many insinuationsReview Date: 2008-05-30
The best legal history of the right to arms in the U.S.Review Date: 1997-10-16
Must-Read for historians, legislators, lawyers, & judgesReview Date: 2001-05-05
Should be required reading for our liberal college educatorsReview Date: 1998-11-02


Nice size, but lite on contentReview Date: 2008-01-15
great resourceReview Date: 2000-06-16
Handbook of FracturesReview Date: 2000-03-30
Great for PGY-1's and 2's in orthopaedics, ER residentsReview Date: 2001-03-29
Used price: $3.49

Complicated but good...Review Date: 2008-03-25
However, when it comes to the practice of interpreting the Bible, McCartney and Clayton do serve a good purpose - it would be for those who are leading Bible studies, seminary students, or pastors who are wanting to hone their skills in this area. Frankly, most of us could use further work and development in this area.
I appreciate that the authors are unabashedly evangelical and committed to a high view of Scripture. Often, the field of interpreting Scripture is littered with so many landmines from higher criticism that it is difficult to navigate without severe difficulty.
Also, this is the first book on interpreting and applying the Bible (that I've encountered) that begins by detailing the importance of our presuppositions. Our often unspoken assumptions about what the Bible is and what it is supposed to do will color how we read and apply it. They do an excellent job of encouraging the reader to examine these assumptions.
I think they did a good job with introducing the reader to the science of Linguistics and the challenges this creates for properly understanding what Scripture is saying. It is a bit technical and detailed, but you should be able to wade through it and catch the main gist, even if Linguistics isn't your favorite study.
My final bit of praise would be regarding their tackling the dubious method of word studies, which is quite prevalent in evangelical circles. (I'm thinking of Beth Moore and Kay Arthur, in particular.) Words are not the basic unit of meaning; this meaning is found in the context that those words appear. Words, in and of themselves, are highly flexible and their meaning needs to be grounded in the sentences in which they appear and the larger context of the paragraph and book.
My primary complaint would be this - after reading "Let the Reader Understand," I was overawed at the high level of complexity required. It seems that an approach like this takes the Bible out of the reader's hands and puts it only in the hands of the biblical expert. That's not actually true, but this is the overwhelming impression I got from the majority of the book. The authors themselves acknowledge this difficulty, yet because of the complexity of the material, they seem unable to cut through the mess.
Let me put it slightly differently - if we, as evangelical Christians, claim that the Bible is God's Word and that it is inspired and infallible, we must also grapple with the fact that we cannot approach the study of it flippantly or lightly. We need to come to terms with the seriousness of our study and, even, the high level of complexity and thought involved. Ordinary, non-seminary-educated Christians should be able to study their Bible thoroughly and effectively. A book like this should encourage greater and more careful thought on this highly important subject.
For myself, I'll probably put it on the shelf for a year or so and let the ideas gestate and then I'll come back to it to challenge myself on my methods and practices of reading and interpreting God's Word.
Stronger on presuppositions than practicality or techniqueReview Date: 2007-02-18
The authors start with the varying theories concerning truth and knowledge. "Can we know anything?" They then carry it through those implications and the limitations of language itself. "Is language sufficient to convey truth?" Finally, they wrap the first section with an examination of the locus of meaning. "Where is meaning?..In the text, the author, or the reader?" It will be well worth your while to reread through these first chapters. It is so much to grasp.
In the second part, they cover pre-understandings, presuppositions and a needed Christological framework from which to approach the scriptures. They make a great case for the centrality of Christ as the all-controlling presuppositional necessity from which one needs to work to and from. They show how Jesus and the apostles taught this and used it in their understanding and teaching of the fulfillment of Old Testament writings.
I would have loved to have given it five-stars, but I needed to hold back for a couple of reasons. First, when it comes down to genre reading, they touch on it in brevity. Craig Blomberg's "Introduction to Biblical Interpretation" does a much more thorough job in genre explanation. Secondly, they mention the New Perspective on Paul and say that "the jury is still out on this." I don't think so: it's been handled fairly substansively. For these reasons, I withheld a 5th star.
That all being said, BUY THIS BOOK. It is a great work and worth it for the first two sections alone. The emphasis of the book is about seeing the Old as being fulfilled in the New through/in Christ Jesus. It that respect it is very strong and compelling. It is a very helpful resource that I have already gone back to several times.
Grace,
--Jeffrey
Well Organized ApproachReview Date: 2006-12-23
I find his writing style to be inviting, concise, to the point and well organized. It's a really good book...on a subject that is not as easy to write about as it may first appear.
This book is a good primer for lay leaders as well as college students who are being introduced to the topic for the first time. We are using it to prepare our church leaders for an upcoming seminar on hermeneutics.
One of the things I like about this textbook is that it covers the history
of interpretation in a short period of time (pp 79-118), so the new student can come up to speed on what the history of interpretation has been in crucial time periods of Christianity. For example he focuses on Luther/Calvin hermeneutics and then modernity hermeneutics after that. He covers all the 'turning points' historically of hermeneutics. The quick overview is a really good primer for newbies in biblical hermeneutics.
For a busy pastor/bible teacher who has not had much or has forgotten their hermeneutics training...this book gives you a relatively easy read without sacrificing crucial elements. It will refresh you on the key elements of hermeneutics. If you are studying hermeneutics right now, and your course doesn't use this book, it is a good one to add for additional research or reading.
Five star...you really ought to add this one to your library.
Worthwhile intro to Biblical hermeneuticsReview Date: 2004-01-24
The price of the book and the value of the time spent reading the book is quickly recovered in just the image of the hermeneutical spiral. I now know from further online research that the image is not original to these authors but it is however the first time i have encountered it. As such a fruitful and thought provoking image i am deeply grateful for its introduction and how the authors build systematically around it. For the hermeneutical spiral consciously breaks the circular thinking that is evident in many justifications of inerrancy or in the explanation of the Bible as the word of God, i appreciate this metaphor, for this reason. The additional image of the grid of textual analysis, surrounded by the framework of an individual's thinking, while resting on the foundation of presuppositions has united several motifs i have been aware of but didn't have a handy way to see relationally. For this to i am grateful to the authors. It is a good introduction to the topic of Biblical studies and hermeneutics and rightfully takes its place in seminary and self-study libraries.

Used price: $50.00

Very goodReview Date: 2008-10-12
Great book, InformativeReview Date: 2008-06-29
I do suggest that you only read this book if you are really serious about being fluent in ASL. Me, I read it because I want to be an interpreter, so it's essential and required for my class. So if fluidity is what you want, then maybe have beginning ASL done. In my class it is required that I have finished the intermediate level.
Advanced ASL Syntax and Structure Book - Not For BeginnersReview Date: 2008-02-23
My thoughtsReview Date: 2007-07-19
Definitive linguistic compendiumReview Date: 2006-12-09
Used price: $17.64

Six haunted Hairdos that make you ScreamReview Date: 2004-01-25
Oh wow, look where we are. We are in the book called the Six Haunted Hairdos. Now we can see who the author is. The author is Gregory McGuire and he has a collection of books, just like this book I'm about to talk about. The book we are inside is a story. This book is also adventurous and has a lot of mystery in it.
Now we move to the first page of this book and we can work our way through the book. This book is about when Sammy Grubb and his club of the copycats try to convince the students of Josiah Fawcett Elementary that ghosts do exist. Thekla Mustard, who fronts the all girl club cynical tattletales, sees a perfect opportunity to spook up a plan and scare the boys. With the help of her friends they get together six wacky, crazy, and scary wigs, a lot of make-up, and some costumes. The tattletales transforms themselves into the six Haunted Hairdos, as they frightened the boys out of their pants. The tattletales give the boys a few scares. When Thekla Mustard takes her club to her house, they go up the room and Thekla congratulates them on what a fine job they did. When Pearl Hotchkiss hears the girls talking about scaring the boys again, Pearl runs to boy's club and tells the boys what the girls have been doing. So the boy's try to get back at the girls. When they get ready to scare the girls, all of a sudden an elephant comes out and Salim thinks it's a ghost of an elephant named baby Tusker. He thinks the ghost is coming to haunt him, but it wasn't. So they went to go find the tattletales after they made a plan. The girls went to go meet the boys and the boys said they wanted to meet the six haunted hairdos. Thekla said she didn't think they would come out, when all of a sudden the six haunted hairdos appeared. The girls ran down the hill and at the bottom they saw an elephant named baby Tusker.
Did you like the short story about the book? Now would you like to tell me any parts about the book you liked? I know I've got some, so here they are. The strong part of the book is that throughout the whole story it never gets boring and has good endings to each chapter. There are no weak parts to the book. Gregory McGuire has wonderful books because they are funny and interesting... I like that.
I think this book would be recommended for children in fourth grade through eighth grade. Well, I hoped you enjoyed your journey through this book. We've got to go before we get taken by a customer, so bye.
Sincerely, Hannah
Elephants, Hairdos, and Ghosts!Review Date: 2006-09-03
A new Copycat, Salim from Bombay, has a secret that might explain the mysterious ghost seen by the boys, but he's afraid to tell them. In the meantime, the Tattletales plan to scare the boys by posing as the Six Haunted Hairdos. If the children of Hamlet, Vermont don't watch out, they'll scare the pants off each other!
Clever and humorously written, this book will capture elementary students' imaginations with the Copycats' and Tattletales' adventures. Besides the fun, kids will also be shown examples of compassion and generosity, traits often lacking in today's media. Equally important, this chapter book is easily read for intermediate readers.
Gregory Maguire's magic touch brings another installment to a great series for kids.
Reviewed by Christina Wantz Fixemer
9/3/2006
Six Haunted HairdosReview Date: 2001-06-04
Six Haunted Hairdos: A hair raising taleReview Date: 2004-10-03
The book I reviewed is called Six Haunted Hairdos. This book was written by Gregory Maguire. Six Haunted Hairdos is a fictional book, and it is sort of a mystery, but at the same time it is an adventure.
A group of girls and a group of boys are always trying to outdo each other. When the girls cook up a wonderful plan to scare the boys, things start getting out of hand. Thelka Mustard, the empress of the girls club, who call themselves the Tattletales, tells the boys that six beauticians were recently killed on a nature trip. Though none of this is true, the boys are not sure whether they should believe this story or not.
Meanwhile, the boys who call their club (...), are having ghost troubles of their own, without Thelka Mustard trying to scare them with her crazy ghost story. Sammy Grubb, who is the emperor (...), thinks that they all saw a baby elephant, though this was no ordinary elephant, it was ghost.
The Tattletales are planning to scare the boys in their "Six Haunted Hairdos" costumes. Thelka leads the boys into the woods so that the "ghost beauticians" can do their jobs. The plan works out great and the boys got scared. Now the boys are even more sure that the baby elephant was a ghost. You should read this book to find out what happens with the ghost elephant and the "Six Haunted Hairdos".
This book's strengths are that it has good details and it is very compelling. It is a good book. The book's weakness is that at times, it can be a little bit confusing.
I think the author Gregory Maguire is a good author who knows how to use details. He writes good books. I would recommend this book to any reader who likes suspenseful, mysterious, and spooky books. If you enjoyed reading this book, then you should read the rest of the book series!

Used price: $0.44

A thought-provoking novelReview Date: 1999-03-18
An epic story of adventure, tragedy and renewal.Review Date: 1999-09-30
A wonderful book!!!Review Date: 1999-03-15
A good story but not for fans of hack and slashReview Date: 2001-06-29
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250