Blake Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250

Which expert do we trust ?Review Date: 2008-07-15
Best book I've read in a long timeReview Date: 2008-02-17
Very nice overview, with problemsReview Date: 2007-08-19
Misleading cover!Review Date: 2006-05-31
and ancient tools (stones).
A few words on culture precisely.
If you don�t want to read about
bones, stones, more bones and more
stones read instead "The Prehistory
of the Mind", by Steven Mithen.
Neither "bold" nor "new," but excellent nonethelessReview Date: 2006-07-27
This is Klein's theory and it is a persuasive one, albeit one that can never be proven--well, probably can never be proven. If under some ice sheet (as the planet continues to warm) we find a 100,000-year-old human intact, perhaps an examination of his or her brain and a comparison with the modern brain will give us the proof. Barring that very unlikely event, there is no way we can see what changed.
But it doesn't matter. Formal proof of Klein's conjecture (and of course, he is hardly the first to present such a theory) is unnecessary. We know from the behavioral changes that took place in something like a twinkling of an eye that humans beginning about 50,000 years ago were suddenly different. They had a culture that developed from the use of what might broadly be called symbolism. We can see this in the petroglyphs and cave art and artifacts that they left. We can also see it in the way they displaced the Neanderthals in Europe and left no trace of Homo erectus elsewhere in the world, and how quickly they spread to the far corners of the planet.
It is easy to see that they must have had symbolic language as well. Indeed, I think language really is the key to what happened, and this is Klein's point as well. The key idea is that "language is almost a kind of sixth sense, since it allows people to supplement their five primary senses with information drawn from the primary senses of others." (p. 146)
Today's mighty culture would be impossible without written language or some means of taking down and recording and maintaining human knowledge. Prior to written language this was done through an oral tradition handed down from one generation to the next. Myths, stories, poetry, ideas, information and methods were memorized and recited. Prior to that however, prior to the use of symbolic language, there would have been only a limited ability to pass ideas down from one generation to the next. It would have been difficult to even share some ideas with a contemporary. But once symbolic language developed, people could demonstrate events and things not present with others through the use of words--that is, symbols standing for the actual objects or events--nouns and verbs.
From a representation symbolically of something seen or something that happened, it was only a step to a representation of something never seen before--such as a net for catching birds or fish or a stampede of wildebeests over a cliff.
This is the innovation that Klein refers to. This is the difference between the Late Stone Age culture and the Middle Stone Age culture, between the Upper Paleolithic and the Mousterian. A human arm can throw a spear, but a human arm extended with a lance can throw the spear farther and with more force. People could travel only so far without water, but a people who carried water in skins or watertight baskets (not preserved in the fossil record obviously!) could travel much farther. Actually I imagine that the first truly modern humans carried soup--yes, soup with its sterile, boiled water--in skins on their backs!
What this book is about then is a close and detailed description of the progression from archaic humans to fully modern humans. It is a carefully constructed argument that shows that the change was not gradual, as some would have it, but abrupt. Whatever one may think about Gould and Eldredge's punctuated equilibrium, Klein makes it clear that in the case of human evolution, a key transformation--indeed THE key transformation--occurred quickly. The most persuasive part of their argument is that the "new" humans were able to not only dazzle us with their symbolic art, etc., they were able to grow their populations and thrive in places where humanoids had never survived before.
This book is also full of interesting information about archeology and anthropology, including how fossils are dated and theories developed. One of my favorite tidbits is this: the size of archaic human populations could be surmised by the size of tortoise bones! Since tortoises were relatively easy to catch, the biggest ones, "the most visible and the most meaty" would have been taken first. So as "the number of collectors increased, average tortoise size declined." (p. 166)
For many readers, the most interesting part of the book might be the distinction that Klein and Edgar make between Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens: "It doesn't follow that Neanderthals and modern humans couldn't interbreed or that they never did, but the DNA results strongly support fossil and archeological findings that if interbreeding occurred, it was rare...this inference, together with fossil evidence...justifies their assignment to...separate species..." (pp. 185-186)
This is not an easy book, but it is not unnecessarily difficult either. I think Klein and Edgar did a good job of treading that fine line between being too technical (and jargony) and not technical enough.
By the way, despite the sensational subtitle (which only appears on the cover), the authors scrupulously and wisely avoid using the word "consciousness" throughout, and nowhere do they speak of a "Big Bang of Human Consciousness."

Used price: $0.01

Fun readReview Date: 2008-09-10
great bookReview Date: 2008-06-02
FunnyReview Date: 2007-12-30
Amazing DahlReview Date: 2007-01-09
The Marvelous Ladderless Window-Cleaning Company catches a robber!Review Date: 2006-11-30

Perfect birds and bees lessonReview Date: 2008-05-15
BEST BOOK to explain reproduction to a six year old!Review Date: 2008-03-04
How Babies Are MadeReview Date: 2008-02-28
I loved this book when I was a kid, and now I'm sharing it with my kidsReview Date: 2008-05-20
This book does a wonderful job of explaining a topic that generally causes a certain amount of discomfort in our society with great tact and understanding. It doesn't include details kids don't really need to know, but it goes into enough detail that they're not left wondering what's going on. The only criticism I have is that birth is presented as something that happens in a hospital, with bright lights and people in surgical masks and gloves seemingly pulling the baby out of a recumbent mother. As a homebirther, I know that this is not an accurate picture of birth, and wish that birth could have been presented in a more positive and more natural manner. However, I understand the cultural context in which the book was written, and I'm willing to overlook this one small flaw in what is otherwise still an excellent first book for kids about the subject of sexual reproduction after all these years. If you can only afford to buy one book for your young child about where babies come from, this is the one to get.
This was the book my mother gave me YEARS ago and i STILL remember it.Review Date: 2008-04-24
Even though i am 43, i still remember the book and the illustrations..and the easy to understand wording on how babies are made..nothing 'secretive' or 'tantalizing' or anything like that...pretty cut and dry wording with engaging illustrations. i know another review mentioned it being a bit to graphic...these are paper doll cut out types of illustrations and i don't find them intimidating at all..it's not like there is an actual photograph of the inside of a woman's uterus ;-)
I give this book 5 stars and will be ordering my copy for my daughter soon.
Used price: $14.00

A Compassionate and Moving BiographyReview Date: 2008-11-17
There is one line I remember with amusement and sorrow from this biography. After Richard Yates tosses back a bunch of pills and finishes them off with a swig of hard liquor, he looks at his child and acknowledges, "This is what keeps your old daddy in business."
I laughed and I cried. Siouxie, Brooklyn
Blake Bailey brings Richard Yates painfully and fully to lifeReview Date: 2007-07-25
Must Read If You're A Yates' FanReview Date: 2007-03-15
Grim reading, especially if you're a writer!Review Date: 2008-02-15
The Unrelieved Bleakness of YatesReview Date: 2008-01-23
Bailey's tone is interesting. Although his sympathy clearly lies with Yates, Bailey writes with ironic detachment so the effect is frequently darkly humorous (probably this is the only way to make many of these events bearable to a reader.) It's like "A Tragic Honesty" is a lost Yates novel where we watch the protagonist stumble towards a preordained doom. I kept hoping that Yates would do things differently. As I read I compared him to his friend Kurt Vonnegut (which is probably unfair, but still.) They started out on similar career paths, teaching together at the famous Iowa writers workshop. And their world views were similarly dark. But Vonnegut leavened his with comedy, with exhilarating games with form and excursions into genres like science fiction and the New Journalism, things which were apparently beyond Yates. So Vonnegut (as he might have put it) ended up fabulously well-to-do, while Yates ended up with diddly-squat.
I've finished two of Yates' indisputable classics, Revolutionary Road and The Easter Parade: A Novel. (That second, chilling book is practically autobiography as demonstrated by Bailey's book. Except for the switch of genders of the protagonist, it's Yates' life story.) "Revolutionary Road" lost the National Book Award to Walker Percy's The Moviegoer in 1962, and to tell you the truth I'm kind of glad. There's a place for hope in fiction, as Percy's work shows. But Yates paved the way for Raymond Carver and much of the best fiction of the past 30 years and that's something to be grateful for; and so is this excellent biography, written in poor Yates' blood.

Used price: $6.95
Collectible price: $20.88

good storyReview Date: 2008-10-21
AHDH and meReview Date: 2008-10-01
Giving an insight for parentsReview Date: 2008-09-09
I felt very connected, while reading this and it has given me such an insight, that I finally feel like I can actually help my son. The stories were relatable, the solutions that Blake recommends are practical and age appropriate. The best part, it is written by someone who's been there, and came out the other side a success.
Enlightening and HelpfulReview Date: 2008-07-03
AmazingReview Date: 2008-07-02

Used price: $0.45

Holy CowReview Date: 2008-01-25
Disliked the heroine's thoughts and actions.Review Date: 2008-05-17
CAUTION SPOILERS: She still loves him but refuses to be honest about her feelings to herself as well as to him. Joe is a great guy. He never meant to hurt her. He still loves her and is patient with her. The major story line is Trish over-analyzing her feelings. She thinks wonderful things but never says them. She is afraid to express her love because she doesn't want to be hurt again. That does not make a good story for me. I was also annoyed that when another woman makes a pass at Joe, which he does not respond to, Trish gets upset and leaves him as if it were his fault. I do not recommend this book.
Sexual language: moderate. Number of sex scenes: eight. Setting: current day Eden and Indianapolis, Indiana. Copyright: 2007. Genre: contemporary romance.
Perfect!! I Loved It!Review Date: 2008-03-04
Just wonderfulReview Date: 2008-01-03
I discovered Toni Blake about a year ago when I read and loved In Your Wildest Dreams. I quickly grabbed her other books wondering if that book was just a one-shot deal or if all her books were that good. And yes, all her books are that good, though until I read this book, I thought that In Your Wildest Dreams was my favorite book. However Tempt Me Tonight is now easily my favorite Toni Blake book.
Second chance at love books like this one can be tricky - can the author create a situation where the original reason for the breakup is understandable (as opposed to a situation where you think - if only these two would talk, there wouldn't be a problem). Also, can the author resolve the original problem so that it makes sense that these two are now together? Tempt Me Tonight is a success at both of these.
This is a pure romance novel. There's no mystery or villian - the hero isn't a Navy SEAL, spy, or what have you - he's just an auto mechanic. The heroine isn't anyone special just an attorney - an ordinary woman who's heart was broken by the hero when she was young. The author does a wonderful job describing each character's viewpoint and pain. The characters are so believable that you feel their heartache. And even Beverly, the woman at the root of the heartbreak, comes off as sympathetic. Not an easy thing to do.
This is one of those books that I read the last chapter over and over cause I just loved the ending. Tempt Me Tonight is a book that I can see myself reading again and again - it's just that good.
I Love This Book!Review Date: 2007-11-30

Used price: $8.04
Collectible price: $18.80

Just a bunch of babbleReview Date: 2008-07-30
IT'S ABOUT TIME!!!!!Review Date: 2005-06-02
A MUST READ!!!!!!!!!Review Date: 2005-05-31
I must have gotten a pre-release version of this book.Review Date: 2005-04-25
If you feel you must read this book then borrow a copy.
Mr. Cokely and Mr. Blake please find yourselves an English professor to assist you with your re-release. If you wish this book to ever get picked up by a major publishing company, you must correct the many grammatical errors and misspellings found throughout the book.
Good Men Do ExistReview Date: 2004-11-05
WHY CAN'T YOU SEE ME? GOOD MEN DO EXIST! is a self-help book that begins with the revolution of dating and the negativity we have about black males including but not limited to the dating outside your race centrum and the metamorphosis of the hip-hop generation. We have come a long way baby from the respectable male knocking on the door with flowers in hand to the assortment of thuggish type males who will blow the car horn yelling your name. Christopher J. Cokley and Aaron M. Blake very skillfully removed the myths that all men are alike and want only one thing from a relationship.
The book highlights that male and female interactions are to be reckoned with because present day attitudes dictate that we have gone beyond the reproach of establishing healthy romantic relationships. WHY CAN'T YOU SEE ME? GOOD MEN DO EXIST! outlines the areas that both male and female need to work on in order to establish a positive commitment with a good man and woman. The sexual revolution has made sex the number one priority between a man and a woman leaving behind education, job status, and financial stability. Therefore, good men have become invisible to the female because her new age definition of a relationship has changed over the years.
The authors' explanations are remarkable and detailed with in-depth research, which makes simple sense. Mr. Cokley and Mr. Blake have opened up doors of understanding about the black male's upbringing and becoming a man. Their priorities differ because of peer pressure and sometimes lack of male role models during the growth and development stages. Some women see them as mere males, fine, smooth talkers, GQ dressers, with money and perhaps a good job; fancy ride and skilled lovers. What I learned in WHY CAN'T YOU SEE ME? GOOD MEN DO EXIST! defines a different side of the black male that comes with mixed emotions and intelligence that reaps havoc with the myths of past and present.
I enjoyed this book because the authors didn't beat around the bush nor did they make excuses, they just presented the good man ideology in a nice package that you can either take or leave it. Mr. Cokley and Mr. Blake truly did their homework. They candidly describe the good man and how you can recognize him.
It is a wonderful page-turner because for once there is hope for seeking a good man, but it is also telling us sisters that we have some serious work to do on ourselves as well. In addition, the poetry selections gave even more depth and soul searching for the reader.
If you're wondering why you can't find a good man, I suggest you run to the store and purchase WHY CAN'T YOU SEE ME? GOOD MEN DO EXIST! You're in for a rude awakening and great insight that reveals it's not just the brother, but it could be you.
Reviewed by Kalaani
of The RAWSISTAZ Reviewers

One of the classicsReview Date: 2008-02-24
Thanks,
Bugface
My 5 year old loves this bookReview Date: 2007-05-31
Beautiful bookReview Date: 2007-02-14
A real winner!Review Date: 2007-02-02
Outstanding BookReview Date: 2007-01-15

Wonderful assortment of Dahl's childrens workReview Date: 2003-08-03
an awesome bookReview Date: 2000-01-23
A superb, fantastic, and wonderful bookReview Date: 2003-07-26
What I liked and didn't like about the Dahl TreasuryReview Date: 2002-02-08
This book left me searching for the complete works of Roald Dahl.
Excellent author, but doesn't include complete stories.Review Date: 1999-11-17

Used price: $0.75
Collectible price: $15.95

gemReview Date: 2008-02-13
poems of perspective from childhood and adulthoodReview Date: 2004-03-19
Pity would be no more
If we did not make somebody poor;
And mercy no more could be
If all were
as happy as we.
David Rehak
author of "Poems From My Bleeding Heart"
The Oxford Paperbacks edition is superbReview Date: 2003-11-04
After a short introductory piece which makes the reader expect a pastoral mood, SONGS OF INNOCENCE opens with "The Shepherd", and the reader is immediately acquainted with Blake's style: deceptively simple, but filled with metaphor and allusion. Many of the poems speak of the solace of Christianity, but Blake shows a more universal and tolerant tranquility found through appreciation of simple human virtues. In "The Divine Image", he writes: "And all must love the human form, / in heathen, turk, or jew. / Where Mercy, Love, and Pity dwell, / there God is dwelling too."
Even within SONGS OF EXPERIENCE, the most pessimistic and cynical half, Blake maintains a his childlike style in order to bring the truth of human experience to anyone at all, young and old. In "A Poison Tree" he writes: "I was angry with my friend: / I told my wrath, my wrath did end. / I was angry with my foe: / I told it not, my wrath did grow", concisely summarising the effects of pride and ill-will on one's soul.
Blake was by profession an engraver, and his engravings for SONGS OF INNOCENCE AND EXPERIENCE are so closely bound to the text of the poems that a photocopy edition is really the only way to enjoy the poems as they were meant. In this paperback edition, the original engraving can be seen along side a typeset text, presented in a size large enough that the words can be relatively easily made out and, perhaps more importantly, the reader can see Blake's mythological characters. These personages, such as Urizen and Lothos, are key to understanding Blake's larger metaphysical work, for which the Songs present a good introduction.
This edition is especially valuable as it contains a photocopy of the engraving of "A Divine Image", a poem intended for SONGS OF EXPERIENCE which Blake subsequently left out because of its savage pessimism. The poem survives on an uncolored plate which is not found within many collections of the poet's work.
If you are intrigued by poets who transcend mere beautiful words to present a complete worldview, Blake is certainly worth reading. The Oxford Paperbacks edition is, in my opinion, the best place to get started with this deep and tricky, but fulfilling and fascinating poet.
The Other BlakeReview Date: 2005-01-26
I am, however, fascinated by his use of relief etching in creating these pages. It's a rare process even now, and was revealed to Blake in a vision (plus a lot of painstaking experimentation). It's the process by which he shaped each letter, reversed, in the printing plate, plus much of the 'illumination' on each page.
The preface is vague and the reproduced images are hard to read, but Blake printed the lettering and line work on each page, then hand-decorated with watercolors. The preface says that Blake went on to create color printing processes, but what they were or whether they're used here is not explicit. I tend to think not, unless a few pages were printed with one or two more plates to emphasize the dark areas. If these illustrations really are true size, then inking on the plate would have been tedious, imprecise, and would not have given the results seen here.
There's much to say about his illustration. That includes an odd conflict, between figures fully drawn even under clothing and the androgyny or sexlessness of so many, an ambiguity that appears in the poems as well. I'll leave that commentary to others, though. The thing that impresses me about these editions is their artistic intensity. Each individual copy of the book was printed and decorated on demand, for a specific buyer. Blake had full control of every part of the creation, the words, images, and reproduction.
It is a rare mind that can master visual and verbal arts, both, then the craft of creating the book that carries them. Perhaps I miss parts of the presentation, but I very much admire the parts that I understand. Four stars because better reproduction would have served his visual art and craft much better.
//wiredweird
Blake's most popular illuminated works in a fine editionReview Date: 2004-01-29
One of issues in buying an edition of these works is that they exist in a variety of colorings, and orders. I would recommend this edition for several reasons. The selection of the King's College Copy is one of the most uniformly delightful or the copies Blake (or his wife) colored. Also, the reproduction is of very high quality. Each plate is on a right hand page with the text in print on the left hand page (in case you have problem reading the plate). Even thought the book is in a large format, the plates are reproduced in their actual size (which is surprisingly modest).
There are also a dozen plates provided from other editions. However, I would recommend that you pick up other editions based on other copies. The variety of schemes Blake used in coloring the plates is quite interesting and, well, illuminating.
The second half of the book is commentary on the 54 plates of this copy. There is an introductory essay and a list of works cited in the commentary.
It really is a beautiful reproduction and a joy to have on my shelf.
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
Of course a lot of us have a serious interest, because human evolution is a hot topic. Hypothetical prehistories abound with evolutionary psychologists having their own set of ideas about what prehistoric life was like, and feminists such as Elaine Morgan in "The Descent of Woman" having opposite ideas, not to mention creationists, and Freud's "Totem and Taboo."
So how do we know who's a expert and who's a crackpot theorist? Is this an objective scientific study? Richard Klein seems to have a deep and wide knowledge of his field, including nuances of anatomy, osteology and archeological methods. He and Blake Edgar give clear and accurate descriptions of carbon and potassium-argon and other scientific dating techniques.
He does have his own particular theory; a theory that a biological change in the human brain about fifty thousand years ago produced a sudden breakthrough, but I was impressed by the fact that he only advances this as a tentative theory and addresses fairly the arguments against it. He's not just a man with his own axe to chip.