Guides and Directories Books
Related Subjects: Beaches and Islands Entertainment
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250


Trust Halliwell's own voice for 'Film Guide'Review Date: 2004-04-10
The Filmgoer's Companion.Review Date: 2002-05-30
The best compliation of movie facts and trivia everReview Date: 1998-06-30
New edition.Review Date: 2000-05-03
Could Be BetterReview Date: 2000-01-10

Used price: $20.00

MIDDLE MEN!!!Review Date: 2007-07-27
Great information for college students on a budget!Review Date: 2007-08-04
Excellent SourceReview Date: 2004-02-29
Helpful BookReview Date: 2004-04-18
Make Buying Wholesale EasierReview Date: 2003-10-04

Used price: $0.46

Good Job!Review Date: 2001-09-26
A High School Coach's ReviewReview Date: 2000-07-07
The other books I've used for recruiting information are mostly designed for Blue Chip athletes. They don't need much help in getting athletic scholarships. This book is written to help the athletes who aren't necessarily Division I prospects. The different ways it helps from Profile creation to the visit, to important questions, to negotiation strategies and scripts to understanding how unfair the recruiting process actually is and how to use that unfairness as a counterforce t level the playing field for parents and athletes is amazing.
The Chapter revealing the real story about Division III recruiting and financial aid for athletic ability is incredibly insightful and powerful.
Athletic ScholarshipsReview Date: 2000-07-14
The book opens so many doors with information about financial help to both collages and universities that the average person is not aware of. It offers places to seek financial help and rewards for the great amount of time and efforts these athletes put into their accomplishments.
This book which has, listed by states, the names of collages and universities where schoarships are offered, along with the guidelines on how to seek financial help which is so very much needed these days. I only wish a book like this had been available when my children were entering that stage of their lives.
I highly recommend this to anyone who has children or knows of anyone who are athletes and are looking to continue their education.
A Parent's and Student-Athlete's Guide to Athletic ScholarshReview Date: 2000-05-15

Used price: $40.00

Entertaining idea, nicely told but with serious problemsReview Date: 2006-11-06
The fact that I was disappointed in their failure to include either of the two major cemeteries in Florence in their Italian book, in particular delle Porte Sante, the resting place of Collodi as well as stunning funerary sculpture, did not preclude me from using their volume Permanent Italians while living in Italy this past year. And after moving to Paris in August of 2006 I was lucky enough to find a used copy of their Permanent Parisians (1986 edition); I then set about documenting the statuary in the cemeteries of Paris.
At first I started out my research in Parisian cemeteries using only the "tours" outlined in the Culbertson/Randall book, and with one exception found their maps are right on the money. (The one exception is a small but important point: on the map of tour no. 4 of Pere Lachaise in division 89, the Delage family, listed as "J", should actually be located in the center of the division not at the corner).
Some weeks later, while poking around a local bookstore I came across Bertrand Beyern's Guide des tombes des homes celebres (2005, in French only). Beyern, a local tour guide of Parisian cemeteries, has documented many of the major personalities in cemeteries throughout France, not just in Paris, and is one of the leading authorities on Pere Lachaise, the primary focus of my work. I also discovered the excellent map of Pere Lachaise produced by "Editions Metropolitain", and available for purchase just outside the entrance to the cemetery. Those resources along with the half-dozen or so superb French websites covering Parisian cemeteries proved very helpful in locating specific individuals. It was after the first several weeks of my work in Pere Lachaise, as well as a number of other cemeteries in the city that I realized there were a number of problems with the Culbertson/Randall book.
(Unfortunately, their publisher, Robson Books, an imprint of Anova Books, never responded to my request to contact the authors. I suspected that some of the problems I discovered might have arisen since their book was written some 20 years and thought a correspondence might have been of some help here.)
Naturally time changes things: earth shifts, things move, and sometimes graves disappear in cemeteries. For example, one of the most striking monuments in Passy cemetery as described in both Culbertson/Randall and Beyern is that of Antoine Cierplikowski. Unfortunately the stone is, well, gone. Not just the statue but also the entire grave.
And even the headstones themselves occasionally change over time. In division 22 of Montmartre cemetery Culbertson/Randall describe the dancer Nijinksy's grave as under a "plain arched stone", when in fact today there is a fantastic life-size sculpture of the deceased in what appears to be a harlequin outfit.
There were a few typos. Douvin in div. 32 of Montmartre should in fact be Dauvin; and the correct spelling of the name is in even in their photo on p. 129. In St. Vincent's cemetery they list the statue over the tomb of Rene and Jean Dumesnil, when in fact it should read Rene and Jeanne. (Jean is a man's name, Jeanne is a woman; a rather important distinction here). This is the same statue found on the cover of their 1986 edition. I also found it curious that the photo of Theodore Gericault in division 12 of Pere Lachaise was reversed.
I also thought it odd they didn't mention the famous American silent film star Pearl White (Perils of Pauline) who is buried in Passy.
On a more serious level I found the tendency of Culbertson/Randall to mention individuals in the text and then not place them on their maps quite frustrating. Frankly I thought that was sloppy and made me wonder if was less a guidebook than a series of amusing anecdotes about famous and the near famous buried in Paris.
Like one reviewer Passy is also my favorite cemetery in Paris: the unique statuary and fantastic stories, all packaged together into such a small place that is hardly ever visited by the tourists, is a real treat. But Passy symbolizes one of the oddest problems with the Culbertson/Randall book: their map of the cemetery is wrong. Or rather it is their divisional layout that bears little resemblance to the actual official cemetery layout today. The authors have, however, placed their "persons' correctly on the map it's just the numbers for each division that is incorrect. Strange.
In St. Vincent's cemetery, on the other hand, the authors failed to use the official division layout. There are online resources here that will serve the visitor much better here.
But it is in Pere Lachaise cemetery that the largest number of errors appeared (all page references from the 1986 edition).
Division 1: (p. 10) They list Gustave Froment and Louis Lemaire; yet they don't seem to be there. In fact they mention that Lemaire has a pyramid resembling the one on the $1 bill and there is no pyramid in division 1 (with the exception of the "Machado de Gama").
Division 3: (p. 10) The authors refer to Marie Lenormand when it should in fact be Mademoiselle Lenormand.
Division 6: (p. 15) They describe the tomb of Ferdinand de Lesseps (builder of the Suez canal) as "pyramid-shaped". See if you think it looks like a pyramid. Send me a note and I'll send you a photo of the tomb.
Page 24: They have a cool little photo here, which I assume they took, but I no idea where they took it: in Pere Lachaise, in Paris where?
Division 12: (p. 28) Serious problem here. The tomb they describe as belonging to Charles Lafont, a man reclining holding a woman's face is in his hands, which is across from Talma actually belongs to Frederick Arbelot and is in division 11, not 12. Lafont is indeed in div. 12 but the other direction from Talma, and closer to Gericault.
Division 12: (p. 30) As already noted the photo of Gericault is reversed.
Division 18: (p. 36) The authors have placed Kellermann in 18 when in fact he belongs in div. 30. In fairness the delineation between the two divisions is confusing.
Division 18: They also report that the woman reaching up to the barred window of Raspail's tomb is his wife. They are right to note that it is mysterious and sorrowful but how do they know the figure is Francois's wife? A shrouded female figure is a frequently used device to demonstrate mourning and is often seen throughout the cemetery.
Division 19: (p. 37) They have placed Dr. Joseph Guillotin (yes that Guillotin) here, near Dr. Hahnemann although there is no other source reporting his burial in this division. Only the "Friends of Pere Lachaise" website lists him as in fact in a long-abandoned tomb in division 7. Take your pick. Here again is an example of the problem that can result from authors not locating everyone on the map.
Division 31: (p. 48) Charles de Talleyrand-Perigord. The authors claim he has his own area all by himself - but I'm at a loss to know what they mean by "area". There is a very large mausoleum located in division 31 which fits the spot on their tour map. The problem is that there are no markings on the mausoleum to denote Talleyrand or Perigord or anyone else for that matter. Furthermore, while the "Editions Metropolitain" map does list one Alexandre de Talleyrand-Perigord no other source mentions this burial. Not even the official cemetery map lists a Talleyrand buried in the cemetery, let alone in div. 31. Moreover, Beyern claims that Charles is buried at his chateau at Valencay in the Loire valley.
Division 54: (p. 61) It is Charles not Auguste de Morny.
Division 67: (p. 66) In regards to the story about Marie Walewska's "hand" on display, inside the locked mausoleum, it is in fact her heart not her hand which is buried in the tomb with her second husband, the Comte D'Orano. Her remains were sent back to Poland. In any case the authors failed to mention that her son, Alexandre Walewski (different spelling from his mother Marie) and the son of Napoleon I is buried in division 66.
Division 71: (p. 68) Regarding the spectacular story about balloonists Croce-Spinelli and Sivel, the authors fail to mention that the survivor of that ill-fated trip aboard the Zenith, and who would go on to become quite famous in the world of high-altitude ballooning, Gaston Tissandier, is buried in division 27.
Division 87: (p. 75) The Columbarium is in fact not a crematorium (a separate structure altogether) but the place where the urns of ashes are located in niches specifically designed for that purpose. Since there are tens of thousands of niches in the Columbarium in Pere Lachaise the visitor must have the niche number or you will simply never find a specific individual. Sadly the authors only locate Isadora Duncan by number - although they do mention the paid of holding hands which is quite nice.
In any case the "Edition Metropolitain"map of Pere Lachaise can provide the visitor with the numbers for diva Maria Callas (16258), American author Richard Wright (848), jazz musician Stephane Grappelli (417) and a number of other well-known internationally known figures.
Certainly much of the Culbertson and Randall book is true, accurate, enlightening and entertaining. But the existence of so many errors and inattention to detail is nevertheless disturbing.
A Permanent Guide to Perished ParisiansReview Date: 2004-06-21
After taking this guide with me on a trip to Paris I was able to find every grave I searched for with ease and an understanding of exactly what made these permanent Parisians so interesting. Pere Lachaise is overwhelming in scale but probably the most popular cemeterie in Paris. The Pantheon holds scientists and philosophers. Les Invalides proudly holds the remains of a little man named Napoleon with a great big history. The Catacombs are spookily interesting. Montparnasse has many tombstones that could be sculptures standing in the best art houses of Paris. My favorite cemeterie in all of Paris is Passy, a peaceful, quaint refuge underneath the Eiffel Tower, where birds are chirping and old graves lay covered in simple coats of moss and chipped iron, you can almost feel the restful sleep of those who reside within its walls.
A must to pack when traveling to Paris.Review Date: 1996-12-17
A different view of ParisReview Date: 2004-04-05
If you are a repeat visitor to Paris, or an armchair dreamer, then this is definitely for you. A morning, afternoon or day spent in Pere Lachaise cemetery is an absolute delight. This book can take you there, and beyond.
Recommended.
A great resource for cemetery tourists traveling to ParisReview Date: 2001-05-06
Interesting narrative fleshes out very complete information: directions to each site, maps of each site, biographical sketches of more illustrious permanent residents, and quite a few photographs.
An invaluable resource for anyone interested in cemeteries, travelers to Paris, or (especially) both!

Used price: $23.89

The definitive work on internationalizationReview Date: 2007-01-31
Excellent book for translators and localization editorsReview Date: 2005-09-05
It really covers anything you should know if you are new to localization, both for Windows OS and Mac OS, and goes deep into detail for people who are already inside the business.
A must have.
Excellent Practical GuideReview Date: 2001-01-03
Not as complete as the description impliedReview Date: 2001-02-21
Esselink discusses the tools that will be used in the Windows environment and how to use them effectively. He deserves a great deal of praise for his thoroughness in that respect. I want to reiterate, if you are a translator localizing software under Windows, buy this book!
Programmers will find that the main value Esselink provides is a discussion of deliverables. He stresses some points that are independent of the tools used, such as glossaries and hints to guide the translators. For a programmer, this isn't the first book you should buy on internationalization and localization, but if you are the expert on it in your organization or you are a project manager responsible for scheduling it, buy this book! It won't show you how to write internationalized code. It will tell you what needs internationalization, what to deliver to your translators and when to deliver it.
This is a good book. For the audiences it addresses, it deserves 5 stars. Other audiences simply need to be aware that it may not be the book for them.
Mandatory Primer for any Localization NewcomerReview Date: 2001-12-17

Used price: $8.68

An invaluable guideReview Date: 2006-09-06
Highly recommended and extremely helpfulReview Date: 2006-08-10
I also appreciated inclusion of details about online access and computers labs. These were a `must have' for me, and the book clearly laid out which schools have them, which don't, and how much they would cost. Additionally, the focus on culture was refreshing and extremely informative. One of the reasons I'm enrolling in one of these programs is to immerse myself in the culture as well as the language...so the insights offered by the book were really helpful.
Occasionally, I was surprised by the depth of information that the book provided. I didn't even know you could receive University credit back in the States for having completed a program at these schools. Not only does the book explain the process of how this is done, it gives you the names of each University or Community College that accepts classes at a particular immersion school for credit.
The book is helpful in both deciding which school to go to, and planning virtually every aspect of your trip, including exactly how to get there. From your local airport, to the school's front door, everything is outlined in detail. Not vague `take a taxi' directions, but the names of specific busses or shuttles running to specific locations, with prices clearly listed.
Overall, a very well written guide. I highly recommend it for anyone considering a language immersion program in Mexico.
Needs workReview Date: 2006-07-13
Taylor book terrificReview Date: 2006-08-12
Terrific source of information!Review Date: 2006-07-28

Used price: $11.35

A constant companion and great friendReview Date: 2007-10-27
Historical account yet clear and conciseReview Date: 2000-12-04
World War II Sites in the United StatesReview Date: 2001-07-02
Would be a great volume if updated.
An Incredible Labor of LoveReview Date: 2001-05-27
Needless to say, this is a special-purpose book for extreme WW II buffs and historians, but if someone who fits one of those descriptions is on your gift list, they will be very appreciative.
A Partial Sampling of CONUS WWII BasesReview Date: 2001-11-19

Used price: $0.01

The only possible reference for XMLReview Date: 2001-04-12
Very technical reading ...good book and very detailedReview Date: 1999-11-09
Best Guide to XML on the Market!Review Date: 1999-09-28
A very clear, precise, and accurate book on XML specificatioReview Date: 1999-10-01
XML pureReview Date: 2000-05-08

Used price: $0.04

in response to the above (inaccurate) reviewReview Date: 2005-06-17
This is not the first college guide for women.Review Date: 1999-01-29
My college search BibleReview Date: 2000-06-30
The book is perfect for my college search.Review Date: 1999-06-13
Great Woman's Guide for those entering collegeReview Date: 1999-03-23


INFORMERReview Date: 2000-01-26
Sincerely yours
Apurba Chakraborty
the standard directory of literary agentsReview Date: 1999-02-04
The listings are useful, but incomplete. Many important agencies have been left out for one reason or another.
Happily, fee-charging agencies are strictly segregated from the non-fee-charging agencies (which are the only ones you want to do business with.) Even if you are foolish enough to go with a fee-charging agency, you can at least assume that the agencies in this book do occasionally actually sell books to publishers.
(I might add that the editor of the 1999 edition, Donya Dickerson, is my second cousin's ex-wife. I've never even met the woman, and the generally positive nature of my review is not due to this rather attenuated family tie.)
indispensable - and entertainingReview Date: 1999-04-09
Indispensable for authors with a finished manuscript in handReview Date: 2000-11-21
However, this book is most useful to those have a finished manuscript in hand, and want to get it in print. Aspiring writers like myself do learn from this volume how not to get taken by unscrupulous literary agents. We also learn what role(s) the agent plays, and we also learn what gets the agent's attention.
"Forewarned is fore-armed", said a wise man a long time ago. This guide and its later volumes can teach intrepid writers a lot. For the aspiring author, two other books along these lines that are worthwhile reads are Michael Larsen's How to Write a Book Proposal and Guide to Literary Agents.
Related Subjects: Beaches and Islands Entertainment
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
The Halliwell worldview is summed up perfectly in "The Decline and Fall of the Movie," the essay that always ended each of his editions. It's the lament of a buff who came of age in the 1930s and '40s, one who never even came to grips with the wide screen, let alone the profanity, extreme violence and other elements that had crept into film by the early 1970s.
Halliwell took the position that, by and large, filmmakers in the latter part of the 20th century either made pretentious rubbish that catered to small, elite audiences, or addle-minded schlock that was intended to appeal to the lowest common denominator.
This isn't to say that he didn't give high ratings to certain films of the '70s and '80s, such "The Towering Inferno," "Taxi Driver," "E.T." or "Gandhi" (three asterisks to each of these), but that overall, his opinions of the output of this era are negative.
The format of each entry is easy to read, beginning with title, a rating from zero to four asterisks, production year, country of origin, running time, studio, color and/or widescreen process, and producer. After the plot summary and review, credits for writing, direction, photography, music and production design are listed, and then the actors. Contributions Halliwell deems particularly noteworthy are denoted by italics.
After perhaps a series of quotes from other critics, Academy Awards and nominations are listed.
As another reviewer noted, you'd do well to adjust the Halliwell scale one asterisk upward by most other critical standards, so that one asterisk is at least two on another critic's scale, two asterisks are equal to three, and so on.
For me, after all the smoke of Halliwell's biases have cleared, a remarkable number of his thousands of reviews are right on the money, especially when the asterisk ratings are adjusted. The reviews are very short, and the critic is sometimes straitjacketed by the need to be so brief.
But also worth noting are the quotes he chooses from other reviews. Sometimes these are in line with his own view; sometimes they are completely opposite. Much of the time, they add to his own conclusions by pointing out issues that he has not otherwise commented on.
His review of one of my personal favorites, "Spartacus," which he gives two asterisks, goes thus: "Long, well-made, downbeat epic with deeper than usual characterization and several bravura sequences."
He then italicizes the contributions of director Stanley Kubrick and cinematographer Russell Metty (the latter won an Oscar). So far, it's hard to see why he wouldn't give the film three asterisks. But then we see that none of the actors' names are italicized. He then lists other quotes. Critic Anne Grayson comments on the film's "lack of imagination." Stanley Kauffman is quoted as calling it "a first-rate circus." Alan Dent says the viewer "comes away feeeling revolted and not at all ennobled."
So somehow, Halliwell is saying the film is very well-assembled as a spectacle, but lacks a dimension that would make it inspiring. I think he's asking too much of the movie, but I don't deny most of what he's saying. Adjust the asterisk rating, and you have a pretty cohesive review.
All in all, "Halliwell's Film and Video Guide" is too terse to be used all by itself, as good as it is. It's best taken as a complement to other guides, such as Leonard Maltin's, and compilations of longer reviews by Pauline Kael, Roger Ebert, Stanley Kauffman and others. For British film criticism every bit as tough as Halliwell's, but more detailed, try the "Time Out Film Guide."