New Jersey Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
Collectible price: $66.00

More History PleaseReview Date: 2008-06-21
In Depth and Brilliant Review Date: 2007-06-18
The book if very fair and covers both sides very even. You get the idea for how divided New Jersey was in its sentiments, the differences between the militia and the continentals and the differences between the Tories, British and the Germans.
This is an excellent book and the only one that covers the forgotten Springfield campaign in any detail. While the campaign in the end did not have any major impact to the conclusion of the war, it was the last major campaign in the north and the only major Crown offensive lead by a German commander.
This is a must for any serious student of the war and of anyone interested in the American Revolution in New Jersey.

Used price: $28.95

Good ReadReview Date: 2008-08-23
I thought it was a good read, and full of interesting knowledge and photos
The RR to Twin Lights is Worth Turning on Your Light to ReadReview Date: 2001-10-11

Used price: $0.01

Great book!Review Date: 2008-09-07
Enrich the lives of our youthsReview Date: 2007-05-03


LP is slidingReview Date: 2004-01-23
Another good Lonely Planet book!Review Date: 2001-02-15

Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $25.95

Extraordinary View of Ordinary LivesReview Date: 2003-02-12
Another Freehold perspectiveReview Date: 2004-02-27
However, the history from 1965 on leaves something out. I moved to Freehold in 1959 and attended St. Rose of Lima School. I left Freehold, essentially, in 1979 when I graduated college.
I was disappointed in his lack of coverage of the St. Rose parochial school since this, I believe, was one of the major factors in Freehold. I believe that St. Rose took over the Freehold Military Institute properties, but since there was no discussion of this, I found this to be a hole in the history.
His discussion of the racial tensions fails to portray Freehold in a balanced way. It seems he focused on 1/2 of the town and forgot about my half. On my side of town, we had great neighborhoods, all densely packed on 1/8 acre lots. I lived behind two black familes (a husband/wife teacher team and a blue collar family like my own). There was some initial consternation, but we found them to be just like us. One of them was a good friend of mine and we were both NY Mets fans, he more than I.
They were just as distressed during the riots because they felt they could be subject to attack from people on the "other side of town".
Also, there was much more chaos than portrayed including the famous "Shoot to kill" order given by the mayor at that time, which I still remember so vivdly.
The book fails in it description of this period and I know this from personal recollections.
You should read this book and appreciate the history up until 1965, but should not form a negative opinion of Freehold based on his description of the Freehold of the late 1960s and 1970s. It was more than he related and a lot better than that, at least from my perspective.

Used price: $10.99

Best travel book about New jerseyReview Date: 2007-12-14
Close but no cigar !Review Date: 2007-09-01

Used price: $6.49

The Origin of NJ's ProblemsReview Date: 2002-09-24
While many other states revised their Constitution in the 1820s to incorporate separation of powers, and checks and balances, NJ did nothing until 1844. The 1844 Constitution placed a bill of rights at the beginning. Property requirements were eliminated for voting by white males. The governor was now elected, had veto power, and appointed judges and other officials (p.8). There was now a method for amending the constitution. No debt could be created without approval by the voters. Slavery was still legal (p.9). The 1873 Constitutional Commission recommended a long series of changes. It provided for a "thorough and efficient system of free public schools", and that property be assessed "according to its true value". The governor would appoint trial judges, they would no be elected by the people (p.10).
De Tocqueville (and others) explained that a governor could not succeed to a second term in order to limit their power. Governors lusted for more power, and criticized this ban. The book mentions "the need for a stronger governor" but provides NO FACTS to justify this! Is this another example of academic censorship? The "Edge Draft" proposed a new constitution, but it was soundly defeated; the book censors the reasons why (p.15). It also doesn't tell what pressure was used to make everyone fall into line behind Driscoll's proposal (p.16).
The voting public was unaware that the elimination of "true value" and its replacement by a "uniform standard" would create continually rising property taxes. Note how this is also censored here. The newly powerful and still unelected NJ Supreme Court claimed absolute power; there would be no legislative control on the court system (p.17)! Next the code words "uniform standard" was interpreted to create an increasingly regressive property tax system. (Was this the secret agenda behind the 1947 constitution?) In 1974 the people turned down casino gambling; in 1976 it passed. Academic censorship again fails to tell how this trick was done.
New Jersey has averaged a new constitution about every 50 years (p.18). Is it due for a new one? Will the NJ Ruling Class ever allow a more democratic constitution?
How This Caused NJ's Current ProblemsReview Date: 2002-09-26
To learn why NJ has the highest property taxes in the nation, read pages 109-111. The older law assessed property for taxes at "true value", the new law at "same standard of value". Under the old law the value for taxes was based on its selling price. (The scam for the rich was to sell property for "$1 and good will" to pay less than ordinary people.) The new law resulted in much higher taxes on older homes. This forced people to move to the suburbs to seek lower taxes. "Urban renewal" attacked older neighborhoods and the small businesses there. (You may have seen this reported on PBS TV.) Moving industry from cities to "industrial parks" was another way to create a market for Big Oil. Since nearby housing was also banned by zoning laws, everyone needed cars to work or shop, etc. This was repeated in other states. Until NJ passes a "Proposition 13" to lower property taxes (as in 1978 California) and bring more democracy to New Jersey, things will only get worse.
Before the 1947 NJ Constitution there were no sales or income taxes, no toll roads, plenty of farmland, and healthy cities with prosperous manufacturing. This all changed in the decades that followed. Increasing property taxes drove people into the suburbs for better living conditions. Then came sales taxes (1965) and income taxes (1976) and a lowered quality of life. You can compare the results to all other states which have a more representative form of government (no "strong governor"). The 1947 Constitution changed the "Garden State" into the Paved-Over state.

Used price: $1.42

Souper FunReview Date: 2000-07-29
All about tomatoes and soupReview Date: 2000-07-26
Initially all tomato products were produced and canned whenever the crop was ripe. Today ripe tomatoes are processed to juice concentrate. Soup, juice and related tomato products are made from concentrate all year round. The various processes are described in detail, but are not overly technical. More illustrations would have been helpful.
Souper Tomatoes is Smith's third book on the subject. Earlier ones include The Tomato in America, 1994 and Pure Ketchup, 1996.
For those who really want to know about this esoteric subject, Souper Tomatoes is a great read.

Used price: $2.90

laminated mapReview Date: 2008-02-23
it's a good small map. what else can one say?Review Date: 2004-01-28

Used price: $3.54
Collectible price: $19.00

Northern NJ gets its due Review Date: 2007-09-25
Well told, well researched folkloreReview Date: 2000-06-15
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
Fleming is an engaging writer, a novelist and author of historical fiction as well as several excellent histories. He has gone particulalry deep in the American Revolutionary period, and for this early work he clearly did a great deal of research on an important and neglected campaign of the war. He benefited from access to a wide range of documentary sources and there is plenty of fresh information available in both "The Forgotten Victory" and "The Battle of Springfield", much of which with appropriate citation to aid the historian. Nonetheless there are nagging errors that taken individually seem nit-picky but in aggregate make one start to question the veracity of more essential points in the narrative.
Some of these errors are those only one with a vested interest in esoteric details might catch. Such, however, is the nature of the interested genealogist, and this campaign involved many of my ancestral kin.
On pg. 99 and again on pg 155, Fleming identifies Ensign Moses Ogden as the nephew of Major Aaron Ogden, who happens to be my Gr-gr-gr-great grandfather. According to The Ogden Family Elizabethtown Branch by William Ogden Wheeler (1907) pg. 85, Moses Ogden was in fact a 1st cousin. Unfortunately, Fleming actually references this work as his source for Ogden's lineage, but ended up getting it wrong more than once in print.
On page 247, Fleming describes the spectacle of the Royalists on the march to Springfield on June 23rd, making reference to "the Foot Guards gleaming in white lace. Even the sergeants wore epaulets on their right shoulders. Their drummers and fifers were in white coats lined with blue, and they wore white fur caps." While that is they way they would have looked in the garrison uniforms back in England, the Service Brigade of Guards that fought in America wore a stripped down campaign dress from the moment of their arrival in 1776 when their commander, Brigadier General Edward Mathew, made radical alterations to their uniforms, removing the lace and epaulets and cutting down their hat brims and coat lengths. They were still elite soldiers, but not the bandbox battalions described by Fleming. His source for this description was accurate for the Guards in general, but not as they appeared in America.
On page 239, Fleming notes that General Nathaniel Greene had a personal bond with Col. Israel Angell's 2nd Rhode Island Regiment but gives no further explanation for it. In fact this it quite true, for the Rhode Islander Greene had fought with these men in the defense of Fort Mercer during the Philadelphia campaign two years before, an event described by Fleming as an example of the fighting quality of the 2nd Rhode Island Continentals without ever making the connection back to Greene.
On page 244, Fleming describes Springfield's "thirty-odd houses" at the time of the battle and states; "The present-day town of Springfield is only a fraction of the colonial town's size." This would be news indeed to the present-day residents of Springfield, New Jersey, population 14,429 in the 2000 census, which may have grown in the past 35 years since Fleming wrote his book but not from a mere handful of houses in the 1970s as would have had to have been the case for Fleming's statement to be accurate. He probably meant to say the 1780-era village of Springfield was only a fraction of the present town's size: better editing should have caught this transposition.
The documentation of this campaign is full of confusing and misleading primary and secondary source material, and it is very difficult to sort out precise troop movements, let alone casualties. As often as he provides footnotes in his account, Fleming's narrative reads more like one of his novels, and I found myself wanting more documented details and less dramatization. In one of the most griping episodes in the story, the brave, forlorn stand of a lone cannon served by a doomed handful of continental artillerymen, Fleming introduces a 13-year-old boy who remains unidentified and is part of Springfield legend. He volunteers to bring water to those manning the gun who are cut down one by one. In the end, he joins Angell's men and fires on the converging British, wounding one "to his ecstatic delight." Whether this character actually was ecstatic or not is a matter of conjecture, as he was reported killed very soon thereafter by a cannonball. In a novel, ascribing emotions to characters is an appropriate devise. In a work of history it is laden with assumption, and this is not the only case when Fleming falls back on the novelist's art.
There are further details that might clutter up the narrative but would have been very useful if included in an appendix. Often Fleming describes unnamed regiments when it would have been a simple matter to identify them. He says that five were left behind in Elizabethtown before the second advance on Springfield but nowhere in his book offers an order of battle. Given that he was well aware that his was to be the first comprehensive historical treatment of the campaign, it is regrettable that Fleming did not provide the details of particular interest to historians. It is still a fine popular account and a good read if you are looking to get the flavor of the events. It has two excellent maps and plenty of engaging anecdotes, but as history it falls short as the first and last word on the subject.