Nebraska Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250

Used price: $4.49

Fresh and reasoned assessmentReview Date: 1999-12-27
Scott and Shackleton's First Antartic ExpeditionReview Date: 1999-12-28

Used price: $6.06

greatReview Date: 2008-02-13
Informative, readable, enjoyable history of the Army mule.Review Date: 1997-12-13
I thought of Francis often while reading Essin's History of the U.S. Army Mule. For one thing I learned that the term "Shavetail", which by the Second World War meant a green officer just out of O.C.S., actually referred to untrained mules during the Indian wars of the late 19th century.
In those days of the horse cavalry, mules were trained to follow a mare with a bell around her neck, and usually did not require a handler with halter line in hand. These were the Bell Sharps. Untrained mules who did not know to line up at their own aparejo (pack saddle) and which might kick without warning, had their tails shaved.
From the Mexican wars of the 1840s to the China-Burma-India and Italian Theaters of World War II, the mule, and especially the pack mule, was a stellar performer in a wide variety of combat applications. Essin traces this history, and by giving a view of warfare from the standpoint of moving supplies to the troops, he subtly changes some opinions we may have of military leaders, and perhaps confirm suspicions we may have had about other leaders.
A history professor at East Tennessee State University, in the heart of traditional mule territory, Essin makes an unfortunate assumption that modern readers know where mules come from. I don't recall him ever stating that the mule is the sterile offspring of horse and donkey, even though he dances all around the subject by describing how mares were held in shallow pits to allow their breeding by smaller jackasses.
He does not lapse into sentimentality, but ever the historian he lets the data tell the story of the Army's use and misuse of the mule in a factual, but dispassionate manner. In every theater where mules performed their qualities were appreciated, even extolled by officers at all grades, but individual mules were considered to be expendable. No doubt this sort of thinking is what made the term "military intelligence" into an oxymoron.
To read of case after case through over a century of service until the last mule units were disbanded in 1956, is to marvel at how many times the Army found itself short of enough mules to do the job, but so little valued them that they were worked to the point where they died in harness.
Perhaps the mule's greatest champion was General George Crook, a cavalryman in the Indian wars, who actually used mules as his personal mounts, recognized the value of the custom-fitted aparejo (Mexican pack saddles) and double-diamond hitch means of tying packs to the mules. Crook was one officer who realized mules needed to be trained to the rigors of the trail, given a means of loading that would not disable them with pack sores, and rested in shifts from remount depots.
The techniques devised by muleteers (mostly borrowed from the Mexicans) under Crook were refined to the point that by the time of the Spanish-American War, the U.S. Army and its mule-centered system of supply, primary by pack mules, was the envy of the world, and the lesson was quickly taken up by the horse-loving English. We failed to learn our own lesson, and much of our front line supply in World War I was by English and French mules. The U.S. Army had still not learned the value of field veterinary care, and was still in a mental fog that dictated replacing rather than healing sick and wounded mules.
When one views the callous attitude of wasting its badly needed pack animals, it is easy to understand how this same attitude by general staff officers extended to the common soldier, who was considered to be cannon fodder in the Civil War and wasted in suicide charges against machine gun emplacements in World War I.
At least when the war was over, the men were returned home, probably so they could breed another generation of cannon fodder, sired by survivors. Not so lucky was the sterile mule. Most of the mules who supplied Merrill's Marauders and "Vinegar Joe" Stillwell's campaigns in the Burma campaigns of World War II, were simply shot at the end of the war to prevent them from falling into Chinese hands. Yet one old survivor of this campaign with a U.S. Army brand was captured from the Chinese service during the Korean War, and re-enlisted into U.S. Army service.
Essin's account is very readable, in spite of his occasion lapses into supplying pedantic information. It is entertaining and informative. I do wish he had a bit more of a sense of symbolism in history.
During the Burma campaigns he mentions the discovery that mules were terrified by the presence of elephants, which were used as pack animals by the Japanese. Whether tame or wild herds of elephants were detected, the mules would bolt. Given that the mule is sired by the donkey, symbol of the Democratic party, this is an understandable attitude, which might have helped Essin to understand why, when President Ronald Reagan declared that defense spending was not a budget item during the 1980s, that the prospect of re-establishing mule units for Special Forces or National Guard Mountain Battalions never got off the ground. Clearly the GOP elephants were not about to let donkeys in any form back into the Army.
It is refreshing to see military history written from the viewpoint of supply 50 years after Dwight D. Eisenhower, a specialists in logistics, mounted the greatest logistics-based operation ever in the Normandy invasion. I take issue with Essin's one lapse into sentimentality in the final line of the book, "We have yet to win a war without mules." Although Francis would have approved, I find it difficult to see how he could have overlooked so recent an event as Desert Storm.
- James Brooks

Must read for anyone interested in the history of the westReview Date: 2007-11-04
Authoritative, spiritedReview Date: 2005-03-15
Chisholm was a reporter from the Chicago Tribune whose assignment was to report on the activities of the Sweetwater Mines. Traveling by train from Chicago to "end-of-the-track's town" Cheyenne, Wyoming his reports of vigilante hangings, killings and life in Cheyenne are paramount for this time and place.
As the railroad advanced westward, he took leave of the train at Green River and continued north by horse and wagon to South Pass in search of the gold mines. Chisholm is very descriptive of geographical landforms, the people he encounters, the demeanor of the miners, experiencing the climatic elements, getting lost, accidently setting the prairies on fire (twice), his callous viewpoints on Indians, glowing reports of the Wind River Valley for future economic potential, his two exploratory trips into these Wind River Mountains and the overall profile of the gold mines.
An insightful read.
Used price: $2.19
Collectible price: $12.00

The Frontier LandReview Date: 2008-04-23
Hisrtorical Novel based on Fact. Late 1700 - to early 1800Review Date: 1998-10-31

Used price: $9.75

The first volume in an essential seriesReview Date: 2006-07-09
Listening to the music of thoughtReview Date: 2001-03-26

Used price: $13.42

A worthy addition to the debateReview Date: 2008-02-10
The essays are very informative and help clarify why certain practices have been misappropriated by the dominant "Euro-American" society. The authors prey upon the same themes in almost every essay, racial stereotypes, misappropriations of cultural practices, and displacement of Native American cultures and histories. Moreover, it appears that some of the authors take umbrage with the fact that certain Native American tribes actually support the use of their images as mascots. In their fabulous discussion of the Seminole Tribe and Florida State University, King and Springwood particularly illustrate their indignation in regards to the backing of the Chief Osceola mascot by the Seminole Tribe. The authors believe that members of the Seminole Tribe should quit "playing Indian" with the whites and work to challenge the misuse of Chief Osceola and the Seminole Tribe's identities and culture. King and Springwood also worryingly rely on a third-person account to buttress their argument that Florida State's appropriation of Native American imagery for use as a mascot only furthers popular stereotypes and prejudices.
Team Spirits is a work of activism. The collection of essays are designed inform readers of the complexities surrounding the Native American mascot controversy and hopefully reconsider their thoughts and conceptions of Native Americans. Perhaps the most important point of the text is that the appropriation of and misuse of Native American images reveal "much more about the non-Indian people and institutions that invented them than they have about Native American cultures and histories." (328) Most of the authors ignore the fact that mascots are not intended to glorify a certain historical or cultural distinctness. Many mascots were created in informal meetings without much regard to historical and cultural settings or identities. The authors of the essays expect mascots to lionize certain aspects of a locale's cultural and historical heritage. In reality, this just is not the case. However, Native American mascots are held to a higher standard as they should be and the complexities and controversies surrounding the issue show no signs of diminishing. Additionally, the Native American mascot controversy overshadows the argument that Native Americans have been perhaps the finest athletes the United States has ever had.
King and Springwood's effort certainly will not end the debate; it does provide analysis and understanding for those unfamiliar with the true subtle intricacies forever associated with Native Americans and their white conquerors.
Long overdueReview Date: 2002-03-02

Wonderful tales of true cowboy lifeReview Date: 1997-07-09
One of Dobie's FavoritesReview Date: 1999-10-15

Used price: $0.46

Excellent, but datedReview Date: 2002-06-17
A definitive work on the buffalo which is also fun to read.Review Date: 1999-01-28
You may consider this review biased since I am the brother of the author (who is now deceased). However, I found the book great fun to read and the technical aspects of the material are beyond reproach. In 1984, Tom McHugh wrote:
"Some reviewers have called my book, The Time of the Buffalo, the definitive work on the subject. The book actually had its beginnings in my doctoral thesis, a study of social behavior in buffalo. For the book, I expanded my thesis to include the effect of the buffalo on the life of ancient hunters, the Plains Indians, the American frontier. Photographs of buffalo behavior that I originally made for the thesis eventually led to my being chosen as director of photography for Walt Disney's Academy Award-winning feature, `The Vanishing Prairie.'"

Trails of Yesterday by John BrattReview Date: 2008-07-26
Western adventuresReview Date: 2006-06-18
Back in Nebraska after a few other adventures, Bratt established a ranch south of North Platte and had a successful operation. But times were changing and homesteaders were moving in and breaking up the big spreads, so Bratt sold out and moved his family into North Platte and built a home there and got into the real estate and insurance businesses. North Platte was still a pretty wild place (some of the stories he tells about gunfighters and drunken melees seem embellished), and Bratt, the steady, moral citizen, was elected mayor to put things in order. By all accounts, it appears he did ("I helped," he says). Bratt was an educated man and takes an historical approach in these memoirs. His style is straightforward and episodic (as opposed to reflective). The second half is more raggedy than the first, as if he was getting tired with his endeavor (indeed he died before finishing the work, which his wife completed for him). His prejudices are plain: he has nothing good to say about the Indians. Unfortunately, the book shows no editing and appears as first published, and, even more disappointing, there is no index. However, it's an interesting first-hand account of one man's experiences in the West, especially the first half of the book. Recommended.
Used price: $1.98

Indispensable to the Old West lover's libraryReview Date: 2003-08-14
Home on the RangeReview Date: 2005-09-01
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
All in all, readable, informative, interesting, and well worth a read. You will find the point of view rather different from that so persuasively presented by Roland Huntford in his recently re-released "Scott and Amundsen," but partisanship -- if so strong a term may be used -- intrudes only occasionally, and then only in instances in which the author feels unfair misrepresentation may have done violence to the historical record.
I enjoyed this book!