Events Books

This is an outstanding book for understanding why the US military has such problems with confronting insurgency. Counterinsurgency is never easy, but the US has proved monumentally incompetent across generations of command. The book's thesis is that bad counterinsurgency doctrine made a successful intervention in Vietnam impossible, and that the conflict was lost as soon as it began.

The most crucial misconception is that there is no such thing as an organic, self developed insurgency. Insurgency was seen as the policy of a foreign nation seeking to intervene within a country, likely as a prelude to invasion. Insurgencies were dependent on foreign support for supplies, bases and command. Combatting an insurgency required severing the link between the foreign support and the insurgents.

Related to this was a belief that light military pressure, or even just the presence of US forces could compel the withdrawl of insurgent support, because such a presence would signify US resolve to oppose an invasion or intervention.

The application of this logic led to a dynamic where the US pressured North Vietnam in retaliation for VC attacks. North Vietnam interpreted that pressure not as a response to it's own policies but as a direct attack upon it's existence. Consequently it increased rather then decreased supplies and support for the VC, ultimately sending not just supplies but regular troops. In essence the US created exactly the scenario it's policies were intended to prevent.

That this is happening again in Iraq and Iran suggests too few people in command read this book.

I had the great privilege of taking many of Dr. Cable's classes while I was at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington. Dr. Cable is a true gift to the historical field. His courses were difficult, but his amazing story-telling ability shines both in class and in both of his books (conflict of myths and unholy grail). While reading his books, I can actually still hear his delivery and cadence. As we go further into a time when local squabbles and terrorists will engage the attention of our foreign policy, his writings and experiences are all the more appropriate.

Dr. Larry Cable's experience and intellectual appraisal for the counterinsurgency role of the U.S. armed forces in Southeast Asia are placed into perspective. While not completely supporting all U.S. activities regarding the reduction of irregular forces, Cable examines the reality on the ground that was the wake-up call for American military leaders in Vietnam. An extremely effective and important book that should be read as much for the intellectual value as the historical value.

This book analyzes how the US came to adopt the policy of using conventional tactics to fight the insurgency in Vietnam. It provides a great analysis of the American way of conducting war and gives examples of attempts to fight the war in other means. Author has/had first hand knowledge of what was going on behind the scenes in the 60's. This book is required reading at many military schools which realize our past failures and are trying to teach current military personnel how to avoid similar mistakes in the future.

This book is a collection of many of Saul Singer's columns and editorials for the Jerusalem Post.

One might think that there would be little for him to say. After all, Israel is a small nation. What it does probably isn't very important. Even if it were to do something drastically different, such as giving away most of its land, or starting a war with a neighbor, or forming a military alliance with Syria, one might wonder why that would be interesting. Worse, Israel's options are heavily constrained: it is unlikely to do much of anything at all.

Nevertheless, there's still quite a bit of value in these articles. For one thing, while Israel's options may be limited, it's still worth trying to keep track of what is happening in the region and in the world. A second point is that much of what is written about Israel is intentionally inaccurate, misleading, or simply thoughtless. It's good to have someone around to provide some accuracy and clarity. Finally, many of the problems we see in the Levant have larger implications, and this makes what Singer writes important for everyone.

One theme of Singer's is the folly of "evenhandedness." That is, the European Union tends to support the Arabs in their war against Israel. The United States purports to be a fair and honest broker that can bring peace to both sides. Singer points out more than once that this doesn't work. A neutral approach towards ending fights favors bullies. After all, if the aggressor and the victim are to be treated equally, why not be an aggressor? And this is in fact one of the reasons that we don't have serious progress towards peace between Israel and the Arabs.

I liked the variety of subjects that Singer addressed and found his views thoughtful and interesting. I recommend his book.

Topical essay collections are often a hit or miss proposition since the essays can appear dated by the time they are re-published in collection form. Yet somehow, writing about the Middle East never seems irrelevant no matter how much time has passed. This is true of Saul Singer's new book. Singer, Jerusalem Post editorial writer and columnist has collected much of his writings for the Post between the year 1998 and the summer of 2003, particularly those concerning the war on terrorism being fought and faced by both the United States and Israel. Singer contends this is the same war and I agree with him. The essays, most of which are unsigned editorials Singer penned for the Post and a number of which are from his weekly column "Interesting Times", are arranged largely, though not totally chronologically and each one is proceeded by an introduction written by Singer this summer, before the book was published. These introductions create a cohesiveness of the essays by tying them to current conditions. For example, on many occasions, post 9/11, the Post was critical of what it saw as American equivocation on Palestinian terrorism. In a number of his introductions to editorials of this nature, Singer acknowledges where his assumptions turned out to be pre-mature or mistaken.

Taken together the book is a striking history of the major issue of Islamic fascism facing Israel and the world since Sept. 2000. Looking back at these events reminded me of many things I had forgotten. It is always useful to go back and examine events one lived through since the perspective is very different when one has knowledge of the future.

From my perspective Singer, an American who made aliyah a number of years ago, is a centrist, which is to say he would give up land to create a Palestinian state if he thought such a state would live peacefully with Israel. But like much of today's "neo-cons", Singer believes that Israel must win the war in which it is engaged just as the United States must. He is scornful of Israel and American "elite" which try to appease the terrorists. It should also be noted that Singer is a firm believer in the free market and many of his editorials have called for serious economic reform of the Israeli economy, which is still essentially socialist.

All in all this book is a must read for anyone interested in a sensible review of the events affecting the peace of Israel and the United States over the past three years. And the Jerusalem Post is a must read for anyone looking for sensible commentary on the current world scene.

Covering the Palestinian/Arab war against Israel from 1997 to the present day, a writer for the Jerusalem Post presents here a series of essays that should be mandatory reading for anyone with the remotest interest in the Middle East.

The book covers a whole series of issues relating to the so called "peace process" which cannot all be addressed within the space of a review. One of the principal issues covered in this work is the ongoing construction of the so called "security wall/fence" along the boundaries of Judea/Samaria (West Bank) etc.. The "security wall/fence" being cited in the book as really being "constructed" by the Palestinians and not by the Israelis, with an elaboration being made that the structure only came into being following the many thousands of Palestinian terrorist attacks upon Israelis. Further amplification being made that if the Palestinian leadership fulfilled their requirement under the so called "road map" in disarming and disbanding the Palestinian terrorist groups then the "security wall/fence" would be irrelevant in any case.

Further to the "peace process" itself the book describes the European Union as largely taking the Palestinian side in the conflict and that a refusal to label the Palestinians as the "aggressors" has made the conflict virtually impossible to end by providing an "inbuilt incentive" for Palestinians to restart hostilities as soon as any "talks" break down. This is discussed in some detail. Reference is made to the Palestinian Authority, Yasser Arafat, Mahmoud Abbas, or anyone else in authority, having given no indication whatsoever of being prepared/willing to confront Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other terrorist groups. The latter shown to be allowed to operate freely by the Palestinian leadership within all the Palestinian autonomous areas.

Page 136 discusses the attitude depicted within these Palestinian groups where they claim a right to "retaliate" after Israel kills what is termed as one of their "terrorist masterminds" responsible for attacking Israelis etc.. The book discusses the matter at length and describes the underlying attitude of the Palestinian terrorist groups as being of "schoolyard logic" which cries "it all started when he hit me back".

The book makes a number of comparisons between Israel's "war against terrorism" and the parallel "war against terrorism" of the US. Both are described as facing the same enemy with the same strategy. The US & Israel both also depicted in the book as being at the receiving end of what the same "jihad" & an expansionist war by militant Islam that cannot tolerate any form of non-Islamic power.

Having said that, at the beginning of the book the writer describes his first visit to the US following the September 11th terrorist attacks and goes to some length to describe his shock at a fundamental difference in the society of both nations. The book recounts astonishment at the number of US civilians at outdoor cafes and shopping malls without the presence of any noticeable security guards checking people at the entrances etc.. Something described as a far cry from Israel's stringent, ever present security measures, which are depicted as an almost unnoticed part of everyday life in the Jewish state. The shock at the lack of such measures in the US being illustrated as an "almost reckless form of freedom". The book not decrying the situation in the US but just using this as an example of how terrorism has affected two nations in a different manner at the present time, as if the respective peoples currently live in "different worlds".

This is an extremely interesting, composed, well written, incisive study into the common threats facing the US, Israel and the West, as well as an informed insight into the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Highly recommended. Thank you.

I read many of the pages of this book in the Jerusalem Post where Saul Singer has both a weekly column, and often writes the editorial page. He is very insightful on the whole subject of the Terrorist war now being waged against Israel. And he understands very well the kinds of media - bias Israel continually faces. He is a very sane and balanced writer, a rationalist who builds his arguments carefully. He is also it can be seen a decent person motivated not by hatred of the ' enemy' but by a strong desire to find a way toward peace in a better Middle East. American born he too has a good insight into the political realities of the world's single superpower and of the US- Israel relationship. There is much to be learned from reading this excellent collection. And for the honest and open- minded there is a deeper understanding of the Arab - Israel conflict than is generally presented in the world's media.

I received this book in a timely manner, it is well written, and gave me the information I hoped.

This is a clearly written introduction to how the legislature works, right down to how to get around the different Congressional buildings. OK, so it's not exactly a graduate poli-sci text but Silverberg is the Editor of The Hill, so he's certainly got the credentials to put this book out. Sure wish we'd had this book *before* we'd done our first legislative visit!!

If there was ever a book for congress that you had to buy, this is it. In fact, if this was the only book you had to buy, buy this book before any other. It is the Bible of budgets, the Torah of truth, and the Koran of Congress.

This book has it all. It has information for the experienced legislator as well as useful information for any layman. It helpes me every time I have proposed any idea for a bill to my congressman, and has told me who my congressman even was (Tom Wolfe, a very withdrawn, yet supposedly experienced man).

It gives information vital for everyone to know, as well as extrememly interesting facts (there has been two extremely brutal fights in congress). There is also information for which I never had any idea about but am interested about now, such as information, as well as the origin, of jerrymandering.

There is just one thing that has the capacity, the brevity, the sum of the copious amount of words I put in this summary...
BUY THIS BOOK!

This was a Dummies book that didn't look down on me. It had a lot of info on it that was pretty cool. It sure helped me on my AP Government test. Also considering I'm interested in Government, it had a lot of useful ideas to help me write bill proposals and other things to Congress.

I also liked the foreward. Senator Daschle, we ned a lot more people in office like you.

Buy this book. It has good things that help you.

I picked this book up a few days ago and was completely unsure what to expect. On the one hand, it had received mostly favorable reviews from relatively reasonable sources and was even being used as inspiration for an essay contest by YAF, meaning that it could not be completely barren. However, on the other hand, the title came off as dangerously polemical, which made me wonder whether the book would merely become a massive exercise in straw-manning along much the same lines as early liberal "histories" of the conservative movement. So it was with great anticipation tempered by a dose of skepticism that I opened the book.

And I literally could not stop reading. This book is brilliantly written - scrupulously fair, extraordinarily perceptive and well-researched. In fact, the very first person I would recommend this book to would be Leftists - so long as they are the honest, self-critical sort who are willing to take a deep probing of their flaws.

Whatever its title might lead you to believe, the book is not purely an exercise in conservative condescension to the Left (though the author does write with a wry, sarcastic tone which often comes off as condescending). Rather, Flynn spends much of his time simply telling the story of the Left, with a minimum of snide commentary (there are exceptions, such as his drippingly disdainful explanation of the ideas of Charles Fourier). This decision to write the book as a relatively disinterested storyteller was brilliant both aesthetically and polemically - the story itself is damning enough without snide comments to support it. Flynn depicts the Left's pastiche of failed experiments, delusional utopians and violent agitators in luminous, vivid colors, but though his brush strokes paint a harsh picture, it is conspicuously not the fault of the painter, for many of the hues he mixes into the picture make his subjects appear not as purely delusional lunatics, but as deeply flawed human beings. One finds oneself relating to some of the most infamous Left-wing bogeymen like Tom Hayden, Emma Goldman and John Reed even as one cringes at the vague, unrealistic and dangerous nature of some of their ideas. This is not to say that Flynn lavishes sympathy on everyone - his description of Huey Newton oozes with moral outrage, revulsion and contempt - but he only blasts a sparse few people, and tries to allow his readers to make up their own mind about the motives of his subjects. As such, the feeling one is left with upon finishing the book is not so much "what a boatload of nutcases" but "there, but for the grace of God, go I." However, this feeling is soon overwhelmed by a deep feeling of intellectual satisfaction as one ponders the truly impressive nature of Flynn's scholarship.

With wit and insight Flynn traces the utopians who have longed to change society. Some were merely silly, some were mad, and some evil.

Take the "strange men who founded" (p 47) the Harvard commune. One was a vegetarian who would eat apples one year, crackers the next. There was also a celibate who heard voices, a man once jailed for not bathing, and, of course, a nudist. What fun it must have been at dinner time.

While some idealists were naifs, some were knew just what they were doing. Take Kinsey, whose "impact knew no bounds" (p 253) as a social scientist pushing for freer sexuality. He "shared his wife with co-workers" (p 254} and insisted that children, even babies, enjoyed sex. His source for this claim was pedophiles. I am not making this up.

Then there was Margaret Sanger, a racist who pushed eugenics, a fact never mentioned in Planned Parenthood brochures. Or John Reed (whose life inspired the movie "Reds") who never met a revolutionary he didn't love, but who had a stone heart for the women he used and the masses killed by communists.

By the 1960's the Left "had grown frustrated over the working class's refusal to adhere to the roles Marx" (p 267) wanted. The 60's nevertheless soon swarmed leftist Panthers, Weathermen, hippies, LSD, and agitation over the Vietnam war. Betty Friedan, a red diaper baby, announced that the home was a concentration camp, and the feminist movement was born.

In the end, Flynn finds "this is a book more about dreams than about reality...Setbacks cause enthusiasts to repackage but never to reassess" (p. 371). Leftists continue to seek human and worldwide perfection. And, frequently, the rest of us have to clean up the messes left behind.

This book is a meticulous history of the American Left, endlessly informative and scary/amusing. However, I call it "one of the best books I have ever read" because of one idea in the book, which I will never forget.

The American Left has two faces: one of them is the Freedom Left("Smoke what you like, bed down with whoever, be free to be you") and the other one is the Force Left("We will tell you what to eat and drink; we will take your money and spend it because we know better than you: do as we say so that human behavior may come to resemble our desired Utopia.")

It's absolutely true, and resonates deeply. Sure, the Democrats support "gay rights" -- but there are thousands of Force Leftists who join virulent NGOs and travel the world to make sure that gay people are doing as they are told. Most of them are fat old women, but I probably shouldn't say that. :-)

Many people might expect a book with the title of "A Conservative History of the American Left" to be a Coulter style polemic. This book is closer to what you should expect from Tom Sowell or Paul Hollander. Flynn traces the history of leftist idealism/utopianism all the way back to Plymouth Rock. The unrealizable visions that Flynn explores have come in many forms and guises. There are also many aspects of this history that modern leftists do not want to hear about. It turns out the Margaret Sanger, Robert Owen, and John Dewey are not quite as admirable as some like to think.
A Conservative History of the American Left is interesting as a piece of intellectual history. Critics from the left will surely find fault with at least some elements of Flynn's research. Its style is polemical at times. The contents of this book are not entirely unheard of either (I have heard of Pilgrim socialism before). Yet this book proves to be as illuminating as it is provocative. Well done!

I recently passed the Oral Assessment portion of the Foreign Service Exam and can attest to the relevance of William Shepard's experiences in "Consular Tales" to the type of hypothetical situations raised by the examiners. A Foreign Service candidate will learn not only from the specific examples cited in the book, but more importantly from Mr. Shepard's thought process while handling a wide variety of issues facing members of the diplomatic corps.

Page for the page, Consular Tales is the best study guide for preparing yourself to take the Foreign Service Exam.

I have been thinking about joining the U.S. Foreign Service and this first-hand account was absorbing and illuminating. I found the personal insight into an often challenging and dangerous career most impressive. It is written in a forthright manner with welcome touches of humor. I would recommend this book to anyone interested not only in traveling and working abroad but also to those who have already done so. It is also for those who like adventures and enjoy autobiographies. More from this author, please!

I thought that Consular Tales was a delightful book. It was fun, and imformative as well. It was the kind of book that I didn't want to put down and was sorry when it ended that I read it so fast. So many books nowadays are not well written but this was obviously written by a scholar and seasoned auther. Is this someone who has previously been published under another name? I hope that I will be able to read more fiction or non-fiction from this very accomplished author. Do we have another Sir Jeffrey Archer in William Shepard? I think Archer is a suburb storyteller as is Mr. Shepard. Lets have somemore tales from Mr. Shepard soon.

William Shepard tells us that when a colleague in the Foreign Service once asked him why, with a Harvard Law School degree and the prospect of a highly lucrative law career, he'd chosen the consular life, he said that it was because he "didn't want to wake up one morning later in life and wonder what living in Singapore would have been like." How fortunate for the United States that a man with Shepard's intelligence, compassion, humor, and grace chose the path he did, and so clearly relished it. This fascinating view of the consular life takes us around the world and across the decades: from Budapest, where Shepard regularly strolled the American Embassy courtyard with Cardinal Mindszenty during the prelate's years in residence there in sanctuary from Hungary's Communist regime; to Saigon, doing staff work for the secret negotiations that led to the Paris Peace Talks; to Singapore, where he tossed back a few San Miguel beers with the original Bill Bailey of the song; and finally to Bordeaux, where as Consul General he found money where there was none to fund a commemorative plaque for a French Resistance fighter by holding one less Consulate dinner party.

What struck me again and again in my reading was Shepard's commitment not only to the welfare of his country and its citizens abroad but his understanding, sympathy, and affection for the countries in which he served and for their citizens. This is a vivid tale of a life lived well and vibrantly, recounted with wit and elegance. It's sometimes surprising and always instructive, not only about what a consular job requires but also about the way to do it right. Shepard says that his hope in writing this book was to inspire young people to take the path of service he'd traveled. If I were a few years younger, I'd be filling out an application and packing my bags.

El magnifico Mexicano autor Carlos Fuentes nos ofrece sus opiniones sobre el Presidente Bush y como afecta Los Estados Unidos y el mundo en general. Mas bien el libro es como una seria de reflexiones como un diario sobre importante datos entre los anos Agosto de 2000 y Junio 2004. Es muy interestante,leer sus opiniones anos despues de varios asuntos que han pasado y ya podendo entender el afecto sobre el politico y economias del mundo. En realidad son opiniones y por eso no pueden ser corecto ni falso, son eso y nada mas, opiniones pero por refexiones de un intelectual internacional con capaz de hacer te pensar sobre sus ideas. Yo no estaba de acuerdo con todo lo que dice el senor Fuentes pero como tengo mucho respecto por Carlos Fuentes queria entender sus opiniones. Tambien tengo respecto para el Presidente Bush y el asunto en que nos encontramos . Aungue las ideas son generalmente como el titulo del libre, contra Bush, puedes leer este libro con una mente abrierto y ser mejor por el. Las ideas sobre el petropoder y la guerra tienen una linea transversal que es deficil disputar pero tambien hay otras razones que no estan explorado. Fuentes no dice nada nuevo pero siempre tiene un modo de presentar sus ideas con color y pensamiento. Las nociones de Fuentes son contra mis ideas pero sin embargo los entiendo y algunos hasta tienen merito. Te recomendo este libro y despues de leer usted puedes tener tu propia opinion sobre sus analysis.

Este libro es muy importante y tiene que ser leído por todos los latinos que viven en los Estados Unidos. Ahora bajo la administración de Bush todo ha sido hecho un caos de nuestra economía y de las pólizas internacionales con otros países, empezando con la guerra y las armas de "terrorismo". Fuentes es muy atrevido en escribir un libro con un tema llamado Contra Bush pero se supone que en este país uno tiene libertad de decir lo que uno quiera. Pero no me sorprendería si eso cambia también porque ahora hasta están cambiando la constitución bajo esta administración. Lo que es frustrante es que libros come este y películas como del Sr. Moore no hicieron ninguna diferencia en la ultima elección en Noviembre. La administración de Bush esta ganando el voto Latino, y una de las medias es por la televisión porque ahora esta metiendo políticos en canales Norte Americanos como Univision y Telemundo.

He recibido comentarios de personas americanas de que como alguien que no nacio ni vive en los Estados Unidos puede escribir un libro criticando al gobierno de Washington D.C.

Primero, me parece excelente que un intelectual mexicano haga una sintesis tan completa de ideas que le han surgido a lo largo del gobierno de W. Bush. El compendio de pensamientos del autor a lo largo de este desastroso gobierno americano sintetiza la frustracion de todos los que hemos tenido el tiempo de pensar cada paso que ha dado la administracion actual.

Segundo, los americanos tienden a meter sus narices en cada rincon de nuestros paises e incluso a hablar con supuesta propiedad y conocimiento de todos los temas e.g. el alegado alcoholismo de Lula puesto al "descubierto" por un periodista yanqui. Da gusto leer un libro tan critico al gobierno americano escrito con tanto conocimiento del tema y entendimiento del entorno completo.

Tercero, no se necesita ser adivino ni pensador de tiempo completo para darse cuenta de los atropellos al orden mundial que se hacen todos los dias por el gobierno de W. Bush. Fuentes hace alusion de los mejores momentos de esta administracion en el ambito de destruir tratados, acuerdos y relaciones internacionales para el unico objetivo de permanecer y enriquecerse.

Este libro no dice nada nuevo, los que hemos seguido el curso de la administracion Bush y sobretodo hemos dedicado el tiempo a pensar y reflexionar cada movimiento de su gobierno nos hemos dado cuentas de lo que se incluye y mas; pero es muy valioso el trabajo de Fuentes al atreverse a escribir lo que escribe y sobretodo al opinar tan abiertamente del desastre ideologico, politico e intelectual de W. Bush y su grupo nefasto en el poder.

Hoy dia para W. Bush es prioridad su bolsillo y el fundamentalismo neoconservador en el que vive Washington D.C. El mundo entero le grita en su cara otro tipo de prioridades: libertad, democracia, justicia, salud, alimentacion, investigaciones, entre muchisimas mas.

Estoy de acuerdo que este libro realmente no tiene nada "nuevo" a decir sobre la presidencia de George W. Bush. Sin embargo, es una obra mas filosofica que pone el presidente en el contexto del mundo y de la historia (hay muchos libros contraBushistas que enfocan solamente en el pueblo de los Estados Unidos, o que contienen paginas de especulaciones sin raices: estas cosas no encontrarás en Contra Bush). Por eso, vale la pena leerlo y tenerlo en tu coleccion.

Karliner has a rare eye for absurdity that makes this more than a mere indictment of corporations. His description of how Chevron pacified an indigenous tribe in Papua New Guinea--by creating a Disneyland recreation of their own culture to impress them--is something so terrifying that no novelist could conceive it. He describes how, years later, the tribe had changed their traditional war paint to mimic the Chevron logo. This isn't just a dry treatise on the perils of globalization. It's a book filled with color, stories, and fascinating details about this bizarre time in the world. From the smell of gasoline seeping up through the richest homes in Playa Del Rey, California, to the history of Standard Oil, to the fight over the forests in the Northwest, to the structure of Japanese corporations--Karliner's book is an overlooked masterpiece that details so many unexpected facets of the global economy.

Globalization is, obviously, a complicated, misunderstood, and nuanced process. And while THE CORPORATE PLANET is not the last word on that process, or on the dynamics by which corporations are emerging as key shapers of that process, it is also true that it tells stories far too often ignored by Quisslings, diplomats, and book reviewers. I write this because I stumbled across the Kirkus review printed on THE CORPORATE PLANET's page here, and it pissed me off. Particularly irritating is the use of the word "shrill," an adjective that seems reserved for books which contest the common optimism that tells us that radicalism is impractical and unnecessary, and that we need not attend too much to the really dangerous corners of the Big Picture. More statistics? Karliner already has LOTS of statistics here. And if his book is "unhelpful" when it comes to suggesting political alternatives, this may be in part because such alternatives are still unclear, and thus necessarily difficult to spell out in specific form. The corporation is the dominant political form of the modern age, and a principle engine of ecological destruction. In such circumstances, just what kind of an "alternative" does one appeal to? In fact, there are some good ideas here, and some good stories too, important stories well chosen. The emergence of the true transnational corporation is one of the most important development in recent human history. If you wish to know what all the shouting is about, you could do worse than start here.

Here are some excerpts from other reviews of The Corporate Planet

Thoughtful analysis of globalization's ecological and social impacts and of efforts by "corporate environmentalists" to control how problems and solutions are defined....With ecological sustainability, social justice, and democratic participation as his guiding principles, Karliner celebrates "grassroots globalization"--citizens demanding responsible environmental behavior from global corporations--becoming stronger and more articulate around the world.

-- Booklist

A fine effort....The book reads easily, without being breezy, moving from concrete illustrations of how giant global corporations are affecting the lives of ordinary people to more abstract discussion of underlying issues.

--The Ecologist

In The Corporate Planet, [Joshua Karliner] explains how transnational corporations like Dow clean up their image rather than their act.

--The Nation

A Magellan-like journey around the globe, giving readers a guided tour that identifies the protectors and poisoners of planet Earth.

--Monthly Review

A thoughtful examination of the new international balance of power in the global economy.

--San Francisco Bay Guardian

Joshua Karliner's "The Corporate Planet" was published prior to the Seattle WTO protests. The book's expert analysis of the relationship between private corporations and the plundering of the earth's resources successfully contextualized the protests as few other books written at that time were able.

Since then of course, many have written about globalization and its effects. But I think Karliner's work continues to stand out from the pack and has in fact gained strength as events continue to unfold. The ascendancy of the pro-oil industry Bush administration and its strident anti-environmentalist agenda seems to confirm his thesis: namely, that corporations and their elected cronies (or unelected cronies, in Bush's case) often proclaim themselves to be environmentally friendly on the one hand while simultaneously rolling back environmental protections on the other.

When push comes to shove, the quest to accumulate profits wins over the environment. Karliner does an excellent job of showing how corporate PR or "greenwash" and corporate sustainable development initiatives provide smokescreens for doing business as usual. But when given the opportunity, Karliner documents how companies such as Chevron lobby hard to roll back protections when given a favorable political situation like the one that existed when Republicans gained control of Congress in the mid-1990s.

The author supports his theory by effectively using case studies to illustrate how these dynamics play out in the real world. Large corporations such as Mitsubishi use their economic power to bend governments and citizens to their will, in the process impoverishing communities and environments as local resources are stripped away for the benefit of distant investors.

Karliner proposes a number of remedies that can help turn the situation around. He reasons that greater democratic input and corporate acocuntability is badly needed if we want people and the environment to be given primacy over the rights of the privileged few to reap the rewards of globalization for themselves. While Karliner may not have detailed a specified course of action -- no single person could be expected to do that -- it seems obvious that he has successfully defined the parameters of the struggle.

Intelligently written and supplemented with numerous footnotes and statistics, I believe it is not too much to say that "The Corporate Planet" is a classic work. I strongly recommended it for those who want to learn more about globalization and the central role corporations are playing in the destruction of the environment.

I liked the information given and how it was presented. IT gives examples of things that have actually happen and this one will really make you think.

It has always been the case that those with excess power are likely to overuse it, at the expense of those who have little power. In the corporate world, the hand of companies can get overbearing when there's a lot at stake. Unions have always experienced tough tactics. Legislatures are wooed with money, contributions, influence and political pressure. Whistle blowers often find themselves harassed, threatened, and intimidated. All of these excesses are documented with recent examples in this thoughtful book.

If you love your relationship with your HMO, the way your credit card company charges you, what your credit report has to say, and how your privacy is protected, then you have no need for this book. If, on the other hand, you are concerned about scandals like Enron, WorldCom, and have problems with corporate marketing to children at school, your HMO, credit card companies or credit reports, you need to read this book.

Mr. Court makes a persuasive case for corporations having gained too much power, and that the time has come to redress that balance in favor of individual citizens. He also provides lots of advice about what you can do to make matters better . . . both for yourself and others. The book's main flaw is that the section on how to fix matters is the briefest.

I hope that during the elections in 2004 that these issues will receive the attention they deserve.

After you finish this excellent book, find something to do to exercise your rights from the lists that begin in Part Three.

This book will shock you with how much information on you is floating around and more importantly, who has access to it. A must read in todays world.

I heard Mr. Court speak at a breakfast in San Francisco last week and purchased a copy of the book. Excellent expose of how corporations are curtailing our freedom and ending any idea of privacy. A lot of interesting things to think about.

Don McNay
President
McNay Settlement Group
Richmond, Ky. 40475

This collection of short stories is easy to read and never boring. It gives the reader a picture of life in China that is very different from the propaganda we get from the governments in China and in the United States. If anyone wants to know about a culture or a country, observing the bottom of society is much more enlightening and accurate than looking at the society from the top. I suspect that most of us, in China and the rest of the world, are much closer to the bottom of our societies than we are to the leaders of those societies. I thank the author for braving the wrath of his government to show us a glimpse of real life in the real China. It makes me think that the more different we appear to be, the more we are all the same.

I read this book after seeing a positive review in the Chicago Tribune and it did not disappoint. Each story of everyday Chinese citizens and their struggles was very memorable, touching and thought-provoking. As an American, I also found it very enlightening, and thought the stories were so important that I recommended the book to family and friends.

The Corpse Walker is the kind of book you will think about long after you've finished reading it!

The collection of stories in The Corpse Walker is comparable to the most fantastic of Jorge Luis Borges' fiction, except they are real. I always thought that China, as big as it is, must be home to some of the weirdest human stories in the planet. Add some fifty years of communist dictatorship to the mix and it is impossible that it wouldn't be. Now Liao Yiwu, the only Chinese among the 1.5 billion that I can truly say I would dig a whole all the way to China in order to meet, gives to the world a glimpse of what some of those stories are. Where else would corpse walking exist as a profession? Where else would they select choice human excrement for delivery to a commune, once visited by Chairman Mao, where it was used as fertilizer?

Throughout, you get a hint that Liao Yiwu did not stumble into the stories by accident. His wit and genius comes through loud and clear.

My only complaint is why only one volume? Why did Pantheon Books not publish the three volumes that are mentioned in the introduction?

On the strength of this book, I think Liao Yiwu deserves the Nobel Prize. Since there isn't one for muckraking, he should be given one for Medicine on the grounds that he helps keep the world sane.

I picked up this book after reading a review in the Financial Times. And I couldn't put it down. There is so much being written about China but nothing out there presents such a fascinating glimpse into the lives of ordinary people who are out of view in all the talk about the economic power.

This is the most enlightening book I've read as a lawmaker. Dr. Ganor pens an easy-to-understand account, not only of the obvious problems with terrorism, but those involving America's future decisions on how to lead without sacrificing US civil liberties.

EXCELLENT!

REP. BURKE DAY
Chairman
Public Safety & Homeland Security
Ga House of Representatives

This is the most thorough, cogent, and intelligently written work on terrorism and the ways to defeat it to grace the open literature in recent times. Unlike the more common offerings in this field, Ganor's work goes to great lengths to avoid or at least identify potential bias and to present opposing views. Nor does the author shy away from tough issues. Deterrence is one such topic. While noting that deterrence can be a matter of image (p. 63), he also recognizes the difference between deterring nations or terrorist organizations vs. deterring individuals or networks (p.64). He analyzes measures intended to deter terrorists, concluding that, ultimately, the attacker becomes used to a given measure and learns to live with it or overcome it (p.74). Yet he also addresses the complexities inherent in making public the thresholds set for deterrents (p.94).

Another example is his thoughtful note that public warnings should only be issued when accompanied by concrete guidelines to follow that are directly related to the warning (p. 260) -- a welcome contrast to the post-9/11 proliferation of nonspecific warnings that often give the appearance of emerging to offset future claims of failing to alert the public.

For clarity, analysis, and insight, Ganor's book is without peer.

Dr. Ganor is an expert on counter-terrorism from the country with the most experience in that area -- Israel. He has spent his life sturying counter-terrorism. This book is based on his doctoral discertation 'Israel's Counter-Terrorism Strategy.' It has been expanded to cover the world rather than just Israel.

Most of the book is presented in the form of dilemmas. For instance, is terrorism a crime such as murder where the individual who did it should be hunted down, tried, imprisoned, etc.? Or is it a form of warfare where the individual perpetrator is less important than the organization be it govermental or otherwise behind him? The answer to this question determines what investigative techniques can be used, what incarceration rules should be followed, how extradition agreements are applied (murderers can be extradited, political activists are not ).

All of these examples are just in the first chapter. There are ten chapters, each of which cover one area of dilemmas. Chapter 8, for instance covers the media. The terrorists understand and play for media attention. On the other (and darker) side, coverage of terrorists increases viewership or numbers of newspapers sold.

This book is the most complete, most thought-out comprehensive discussion on counter-terrorism that I have seen. Note my emphasis on counter-terrorism. This is a book on how to fight terrorism, it is not a book on terrorism per se.

Highly recommended. I hope our leaders read this.

Saw Mr. Ganor on C-Span - May 2005. His absolute (total mastery) of the suject of the (radical) Muslim terrorist movement mindset, and his analysis how to end this (complex, difficult, and long-range problem) ... is nothing short of brilliant !