Senses Books

This collection of poems is dedicated by the author, Augusta E. Stetson, to her Leader and Teacher, the Reverend Mary Baker Eddy, the Discoverer and Founder of Christian Science, "As a student to the Teacher; as a follower to the Leader; as a child to the Mother." Originally published in five editions from 1901 to 1928, this edition is a reprint of Mrs. Stetson's Fourth Edition of her Poems, published in 1921. White cloth; illustrations, color portraits, and music; 132 pages; reprint of the 1921 edition.

This book has been extremely pivotal in our lives,especially when making decisions. It seems that every time we would enter a time of change, either with our work or moving to a new geographic location, we would re-read this book. It is laced with Rick's own stories and the Word to offer Wisdom and inspiration. In our lives, this book has been a wonderful tool to keep us moving forward in God's Plan and to bring clarity to new situations.

True I am the author of this modest tome (so how many stars should I have given it??), but let me specify what I think the strengths of this book are. You can spend countless hours and days sifting through Freire, Kincheloe, McLaren, Bourdeau, hooks, Chomsky, Friedman (yes, Uncle Milty that is), and perusing all sorts of material on No Child Left Behind, curriculum foundations and the politics of education....OR you can give my book a chance. I do my best to condense and interpret all the pertinent arguments in an explication and defense of critical pedagogy in a highly readable manner. Further, most critical pedagogy literature is written by university academics with university settings in mind (nothing wrong with this mind you), but I am a high school teacher and draw from my experiences teaching at this level (as well as in middle school) in America, the Caribbean and South Korea to illustrate concepts like hegemony, ideology, humanization, cultural capital, heuristics, and a host of others. Check it out, and I hope you enjoy it at the same time you learn something. Venceremos!

Dr. Beam has cut to the quick on many of lifes challenges, and offers a chance to rethink the way you live and conduct your life. His insights and solutions to many day to day situations and life choices can definitly enhance anyones life and health.

I read these works for a graduate seminar on Aristotle.

Soul- De Anima Latin for Greek word Psuche=Life. It is a Phenomenology of Life. Living things are Aristotle¡¦s primary interest. Renee Descartes says thinking is only aspect of soul, not life. For Descartes the soul is the mind. Aristotle classifies features of living things. A soul can¡¦t be a body, (like a corpse). Psuche=life is a living form of the body, the phenomenon of life. Capacity to live is what he means. Ergon=function or work, thus when he talks about soul it is a body¡¦s function. Thus, a corpse is a deactivated body. Dunamis=capacity, Energia= actuality, thus both words are active words and can be seen as ¡§activating capacity.¡¨ Like a builder while building a house, past potential but not actual until the house is complete.
Entelecheia=¡¨living things have their ends inside them.¡¨ A living being has an end in itself.

What is the soul? Psuche= soul is being working toward ends of a self-moving body having the capacity to live. This is another way of talking about desire (like an animal that is hungry). Desire-animals have this as we do. Orexis=desire. The phenomenology of desire is to be motivated towards something that is lacking at the time, hunger, etc. Pleasure and pain.
Desire and action there are 3 kinds of desire.

1. Appetite like hunger and sex.
2. Emotion-like love not on crude level as appetite.
3. Wish-desire of the mind, (I want a good job).

All three strive towards something that is lacking. ¡§Desire is movement of the soul.¡¨ Human life is a set of desires. Human desires are more complicated. Desires clash like dieting and appetite.

¡§All humans desire to know.¡¨ This is the first line of the Metaphysics. Knowledge examined in terms of distinction between matter and form, perception has to do with intelligible form. Perception takes in visible form of something without the matter. Like imagination, an animal and human can do this. All knowledge starts with perception thus memory. Ultimate knowledge is intelligible form from visible form but mind is also using abstractions, this is a human capacity only. Humans use language to do this. Animals have image of a cat, word ¡§cat¡¨ is an abstraction for us. True knowledge organizes language.

Seing<³being seen. Two beings, seer and seen, this is act of vision it is only one actuality and two potentialities. In effect, Aristotle is saying that the capacity to see can only be actualized by seeing something. However, he goes the other way as well; something seeable only actualizes its seeability by being seen. One actuality, two potentials, the potential to see, the potential to be seen. In the modern world since Descartes, it is spoken as two actualities, the mind, and the outside world and there is a split between the two, two actualities, the mind as a separate thing and the object as a separate thing being seen. This is the source of the classic problem of skepticism. When there is seeing obviously you have two beings, the seer and the seen, but the act of vision is one actuality. Aristotle does not have this skeptical problem because he seems to stipulate this idea of single actuality and the whole point of the capacity to know is meant to hook up with things known. The whole point of knowable things is to be known by knower¡¦s, that is what he means by one actuality, thus there is no split between the mind and the world. There is no purely inside and outside. It isn¡¦t that minds are in here and the world is out there, and we might wonder about how they hook up. The nature of things and the nature of the mind are meant to hook up. Thus, Aristotle is not a radical skeptic like Descartes or Hume. Act of seeing the desk is joint actuality of seer and seen.

Actual hearing and actual sounding occur at the same time. Berkeley¡¦s famous question¡K¡¨If a tree falls in the forest and there is no one there to hear it, does it make a sound? For Berkeley, to be is to be perceived. Aristotle answers Berkeley¡¦s question that it does make a sound, but you have to have the capacity to hear, it is a joint venture. The mind and the world are not separated like for Descartes. Aristotle doesn¡¦t buy the idea that ¡§everything in my mind can be false¡¨ like the skeptics argue, Aristotle would say this is impossible. Getting things true and false are part of what the mind has to do, but the possibility that the whole mental realm could be put into question is impossible. Thus, he doesn¡¦t have to answer the question put to skeptics. ¡§If you are right that there is a radical doubt about the possibility of our knowledge hooking up with reality, why would the human situation ever come to pass in this way that it is possible that we could be totally wrong.¡¨ The skeptics answer we are not sure that we are wrong, they are saying we can¡¦t be sure that we are right. If that were the case then Aristotle can say, well is this a recipe for the human condition? One can be skeptical about this or that, but not about everything.

Aristotle moves from perception to thought. The thinking of the world and world to be thought is actualization. Nous=highest capacity of intellect for Aristotle. Mind is potential and until it thinks isn¡¦t actualization. The implication of this the world wants to be known according to Aristotle. The world also activates our desire. One actualization of two potentialities. Taking in form without matter that is what knowledge is. A knowing soul cannot be separation from the body. The mind has built in capacity to understand for Aristotle, no actual knowledge until intellect engages with objects. ¡§Actually thinking mind is the thing that it thinks. In this respect the soul is all existing things.¡¨ Soul is capacity to think the world in the passage.

I recommend Aristotle¡¦s works to anyone interested in obtaining a classical education, and those interested in philosophy. Aristotle is one of the most important philosophers and the standard that all others must be judged by.

Dr. Cox has written a very well-researched account of the differing lifestyles, and attitudes towards, officers and enlisted person during the American War of Independence. Without the historical background, it is nearly impossible for people with today's sensibilities to understand the dichotomy. We have long left behind the life when a "commoner" was expected to doff a cap in the presence of a gentleman, or the fact that such individuals were really not held to be as "equal" as some of our documents from the periods would seem to indicate. "All men are created equal" clearly did not apply to everyone. In fact, the breaking down of the the distinction between the gentry and "the common herd" was something that many revolutionary leaders neither anticipated nor advocated (see S. Gordon Wood's The Radicalism of the American Revolution or Revolutionary Characters, for example). Washington himself, as Cox notes, was a huge proponent of the distinction and believed that the accepted superiority of the character and intelligence of "gentlemen" was necessary for military order. Cox makes this accepted distinction crystal clear and shows the implications for how the troops were treated and were considered by the population at large. To our eyes, the distinctions between how officers and enlisted persons were treated seems arbitrary and most unfair. Cox's careful historical analysis allows us to understand this better by understanding the thinking of the day regarding the make-up of the people involed. I would recommend Freeman's Affairs of Honor as excellent supplemental reading.

Protect Yourself is a definitive and thoroughly "user friendly" instructional guide to successfully defending oneself against a variety of all manner of threats arising in a post-September 11th world. From keeping careful track of one's diet; to making plans against man-made or natural catastrophes; to guidelines for buying property insurance; to ways of coping with troublesome friends or family members, Protect Yourself shares a wealth of common sense "tips, tricks and techniques" for keeping ourselves and our families safe and sound. Protect Yourselves is very highly recommended reading for individuals and family providers everywhere.

Wright uses extensive research to demonstrate prophetic truth that has never before been revealed. He shows how Biblical prophecy is relevant today and is being displayed on the evening news. He PROVES his findings with the timeframes given in Scripture. Wright shows where the dates of May 15, 1948 and June 10, 1967 are plainly given in Scripture and tells how they tie into the Seventieth Week of Daniel and these last days. While most Bible teachers seem to have left their sanity behind with fantasies of Star Trek scenarios, Wright explains prophecy like you have never seen before. BUY THIS BOOK!! You will be glad you did!!

I bought this book as a gift for a friend. She's always felt that she can communicate with the spirits, but din't have the experience to do it at will. I saw this book and though of her. She seems to be very involved in it and she's told me that she loves the book. So as a gift for someone looking to develope their ablilities, this book was a winner.

I know this is probably not the sort of review people want to read, but there are no thers here and I think reviews encourage would be customers.

This book is a collection of chapters authored by some of the most well-known researchers in psychology of touch. The material in this book does not require to have special knowledge to be comprehended but it nevertheless provides a solid overview of current research on touch summarizing results in different topics related to touch: active touch, vibrotactile perception, relation between vision and touch and many others. Although I am not psychologist and can not judge how current the material is, this book served me as an excellent introduction to the field to get an idea what is currently going, it serves well as a reference and starting point for further exploration.