Reviews Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250

Used price: $39.00

GreatReview Date: 2007-08-30
Great BookReview Date: 2001-06-27
Excellent case review bookReview Date: 2003-07-24
Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $10.00

Uncommon InsightReview Date: 2008-07-31
Knowing GodReview Date: 2006-10-02
The best guide to learn about God and His will.Review Date: 2004-12-19


wonderful cdReview Date: 2007-02-16
Awesome study guideReview Date: 2006-03-08
Awesome CDReview Date: 2001-05-25
The CD appears to be professionally done, with color graphics, sound effects, different types and levels of questions, and sophisticated scoring and saving routines. One hardly knows that these are the same questions that are in Todd's acclaimed review books - they appear so much more colorful and interactive.
Although it is designed to award CEU credits upon completion of a chapter they do not appear to be available yet. Perhaps after the nursing organizations see how educational one of these chapters is this Todd will get this worked out.

Used price: $85.00

The best book on the book/film contrastsReview Date: 2007-08-06
very usefulReview Date: 2005-10-26
Brilliant and balancedReview Date: 2006-08-16

Used price: $0.01

Excellent book for 20-somethingsReview Date: 2001-12-13
The book I would have written...Review Date: 2001-02-14
Trashproof ResumesReview Date: 2000-06-22
It's definitely a number one trashproof reference for people seeking help designing resumes.
Collectible price: $20.00

How the American left invented "McCarthyism".Review Date: 2008-07-01
An Unjust Prosecution vs. A Brilliant DefenseReview Date: 2006-02-28
The brief background to the trial gives the reader the diverstiy of the defendents and their plan of attack in court. Dennis refused to cooperate in any plea agreements because, as he correctly saw, the government had no case. Rather than argue the legal definitions of the law, Dennis and St. George argued that no crime had been committed, and there was absolutely no case. Admittedly some of the defendents were rabid anti-semites which could have proved embarrassing, but this was not a crime defined by statue.
Government prosecutors probably thought that because many of the defendants were poor and had few resources, these prosecutors may have thought this would be an easy case to win. What they did not anticipate was the fact that some of the defendants were intelligent, and their intelligence more than compensated for lack of resources.
One of the charges brought against the defendants was attempting to cause mutiny in the armed forces. Yet, the government could not present one shred of credible evidence to sustain such a charge. In fact, one of the defendants lost his son fighting against the Germans during the trial. As for the accusation that these defendents posed a serious threat, one of the defendants died during the trial with about fifty cents in his pocket.
Basically, the defense, especially Dennis, challenged every introduction of government "evidence." Dennis remarked that the evidence was obviously weak, but to wait until the prosecution was finished would have been an error. The jurors would be tired and give more weight to the prosecution's evidence and might be too tired or bored to carefully listen to the defense's refutation of the goverment's "evidence." By challenging the presecution's evidence as it was presented, jurors had a better chance to see just how weak the government's case was.
The diagnois of the trial was also enlightening. This trial was compared to Stalin's "Show Trials" of the 1930s. There were no criminal acts, and the charges amounted to unpopular opinions. Some of the journalists who first thought they were reporting on a fameous trial became bored with the whole event as they too saw the government's case as weak and frivolous. In other words, what was supposed to be a show trial soon became almost a non-event in the view of the media.
Basically, the government prosecutors ran into vigorous defense which they never anticipated. After months of claiming there were records in Germany and Italy that would prove a conspiracy, no such evidence was found. Government prosecutors asked for delays and still no such evidence was presented because there was none.
What began as a showcase trial ended as a dismal failure for the government. The judge died during the trial, and due to the stinging rebuke from the defense, the case was adriotly dropped. There was no crime and no evidence to prove there was. Intelligent defendants made a shambles out of the trial to the dismay of those who promoted the trial. One should also realize that the trial was a victory for civil libertarians.
Dennis and St. George wrote a long but masterful book on the corrupt and illegal operations of the U.S. "Justice" system. A careful reading of this book will show that quite often government legal "experts" are giants with feet of clay.
The Great Sedition Trial of 1944 Farce.Review Date: 2004-02-24
It was in light of his theories that Dennis got himself into trouble with the current powers that be. Indeed, approximately 40 dissidents and "crackpots" were hauled up by the government in a great show trial on charges of sedition in 1944. What was the purpose of this trial? Dennis argues that it was purely for propaganda purposes by the Roosevelt administration and refers to it as a farce and a waste of the taxpayer's money in this book _A Trial on Trial_. In fact, the trial did not attempt to prove the charge that the defendants had tried to make members in the armed forces mutiny, but rather instead alleged a "worldwide Nazi conspiracy" in which the defendants took part. Dennis argues that this trial was done in the tradition of Moscow, in which the government attempted to "educate" the public on the evils of "anti-Semitism, isolationism, and anti-communism" by means of a trial. For Dennis, he certainly could not be charged with the noxious anti-Semitic charge (still used so often today against those who propose another perspective) because his writings specifically showed the foolishness of anti-Semitism. Dennis argued that it was particularly ironic that the defendants were often referred to by the prosecution as "crackpots", because according to the dictionary a "crackpot" is a "harmless lunatic" but in the same breath the prosecution would call them all "dangerous".
But why was this trial staged at all? According to Dennis these individuals (the "crackpots") were easy targets. They were dissidents and quite frequently agitators who rebelled against the present order. However, many "respectable" Americans (including certain famous "isolationist" Congressmen such as Senator Nye, John T. Flynn, and the elder Lindhbergh) also shared the views of these "agitators" but were unable or unwilling to admit this in public or to take nearly such a radical stance. Indeed, according to Dennis it was not really the "crackpots" who were the target of the trial at all. Rather it was the dissident but respectable Americans who Roosevelt and his cronies were after. Afterall, by going after the "crackpots" the message to the rest of America was clear: if you share these views you'd best keep quiet because we'll go after you next, best just to parrot the Roosevelt line in times of war.
In addition, powerful Jewish groups including the freemasonic B'nai B'rith wanted the defendants prosecuted on the charge of anti-Semitism. While many of the defendants including the individual writing under the pen name Major-General Count Cherep-Spiridovich, claiming to be a Russian general of Aryan descent, were indeed virulent anti-Semites, the majority were not. (Interestingly, the chess player Bobby Fisher attempting to understand the Judeo-Bolshevik conspiracy behind international chess professionals has recommended the book by Count Cherep-Spiridovich entitled _The Secret World Government_, currently available from the Booktree publishers.) Indeed, anti-Semitism has always existed and can hardly be called a crime, certainly not by any legal standard within the United States and certainly not supported by the Constitution of the United States. While it may be understandable that these Jewish groups wanted to stamp out anti-Semitism, their methods for doing so were truly Machievellian and completely without regard to civil liberties. The same applies to the manner in which the ideologies of "isolationism" and "anti-communism" were being eradicated.
It is common for those among the communists to refer to every single opponent of the official "Moscow line" as a fascist. Indeed, the word fascist is a term of such abuse that it no longer has any meaning whatsoever. Indeed, when the fellow communist Trotsky deviated from the official Stalin-line he suddenly became a "fascist". So, the fascist smear is really old news and of course the left was playing this up in the sedition trial. However, many of those who certainly could not be referred to as part of the left wing extreme or communists continued to parrot the "fascist line" unaware that they were in fact unwitting pawns for Moscow.
After 6 months of unnecessary trial, the judge, worn thin from all the headache, had a heart attack and died. The trial was subsequently declared a mistrial and the defendants were all left off the hook. However, this trial had been a farce and a true perversion of American justice, attempting to cash in on the unanimous agreement of all Americans that fascism was a "bad thing" to persecute certain dissidents and "crackpots" who would not toe the interventionist/Roosevelt line. Dennis subsequently went back to his work and his writing.
This book, _A Trial on Trial_ presents the case point by point including the prosecutor's main arguments (or lack thereof) and sound rebuttal by the defense. The book is co-written by Lawrence Dennis who served as his own attorney and the defense attorney Maximilian St. George. This book is re-issued by the Institute for Historical Review and preserves one of the few accounts of revisionist scholarship dealing with the pre-World War II debacle of the Roosevelt "interventionist" administration.


Can't Live Without ItReview Date: 2001-01-31
It doesn't get any better!Review Date: 2001-01-25
An excellent reference guideReview Date: 2001-01-24

Used price: $47.90

ultrasoun techReview Date: 2008-05-27
perfect for the ARDMS general physics and instrumentation examReview Date: 2007-01-09
Ultrasound Physics & Instrumentation ARDMS ExamReview Date: 2007-01-09

Excellent book!Review Date: 2006-07-03
great condensed exam or clinical reviewReview Date: 1999-05-01
An excelent quick-reference in O&G ultrasoundReview Date: 1999-06-05


There should be more books like this oneReview Date: 2005-03-09
Review of Unmasking Terror by Michael ScheuerReview Date: 2005-05-17
"If it's not classified, it's not intelligence." Sadly this operating assumption is all too commonly held in the highest policy-making levels of Western governments. U.S. and European policymakers -- appointed and elected -- are beguiled by the thought of reading materials collected in the ether or via spies, and often ignore information just as pertinent to their pending decisions simply because it is unclassified. To their countries' detriment, they miss much because of this condescending attitude, and the excellent new book from the non-partisan Jamestown Foundation -- Unmasking Terror: A Global Review of Terrorist Activities -- provides a superb example of the kind of quality information policymakers tend to ignore.
Jamestown's 600-page volume captures the worldwide dimensions of Islamic terrorism and insurgency and does so in short, digestible articles based on indigenous press sources, personal interviews, and the substantial experience of their authors. Multiple articles on al-Qaeda that give readers a clear view of the organization's durability and lethal potential are followed by similar multi-essay sections on Chechnya, Pakistan, Central Asia, the Middle East, the Persian Gulf, Afghanistan, and Europe and North America. The volume's editors succeed not only in providing a region-by-region review of Islamic terrorism, but have constructed their book in a way that affords the reader an understanding of how the groups -- of which al-Qaeda is only the most prominent -- increasingly view themselves as part of a worldwide movement.
Jamestown's Unmasking Terror also presents the reader with what seems to me a unique set of interviews with some of the world's top experts on the war being waged by al-Qaeda and its allies. Peter Bergen, Jason Burke, and former National Security Council Senior Director Daniel Benjamin speak on the capabilities and evolution of al-Qaeda, while Sa'd al-Faqih, the London-based leader of the Movement for Reform in Arabia, discusses al-Qaeda's role within the context of opposition to the al-Saud family in Saudi Arabia. Other interviews in the book also add to our understanding of the growth of Islamic militancy in Europe, Central Asia, Iraq, the Arabian Peninsula, and Afghanistan.
I would recommend Unmasking Terror to any specialist or lay reader who is interested in an erudite but manageable survey of Islamic terrorism around the globe. The book will leave the reader with a solid if unsettling view of the dangerous historical period into which the West has entered. It may also leave the reader angry that the policymakers tasked to defend us against the terrorist threat far too frequently fail to exploit the kind of fine, objective, and unclassified scholarship on the issue that is contained in Unmasking Terrorism.
Michael Scheuer served in the CIA for 22 years before resigning in 2004. He served as the Chief of the bin Laden Unit at the Counterterrorist Center from 1996 to 1999. He is the once anonymous author of Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror and Through Our Enemies' Eyes: Osama bin Laden, Radical Islam, and the Future of America. Mr. Scheuer is a regular contributor to the Terrorism Focus, a publication of the Jamestown Found
good for researchers...Review Date: 2005-04-22
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
Highly recommended just like all the others books from this series.