Oscar Wilde Books
Related Subjects: Works Quotations
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250

Used price: $38.38

The wittiest play ever written in the English languageReview Date: 2005-07-29

The wittiest play ever written in the English languageReview Date: 2004-07-27
Wilde believed in art for art's own sake, which explains why he emphasized beauty while his contemporaries were dealing with the problems of industrial England. "The Importance of Being Earnest" is set among the upper class, making fun of their excesses and absurdities while imbuing them with witty banter providing a constant stream of epigrams. The play's situation is simple in its unraveling complexity. Algernon Moncrieff is an upper-class English bachelor who is visited by his friend Jack Worthing, who is known as "Ernest." Jack has come to town to propose to Gwendolen Fairfax, the daugher of the imposing Lady Bracknell and Algy's first cousin. Jack has a ward named Cecily who lives in the country while Algernon has an imaginary friend named "Bunbury" whom he uses as an excuse to get out of social engagements.
Jack proposes to Gwendolen but has two problems. First, Gwendolen is wiling to agree because his name is Ernest, a name that "seems to inspire absolute confidence," but which, of course, is not his true Christian name. Second, Lady Bracknell objects to Jack as a suitor when she learns he was abandoned by his parents and found in a handbag in Victoria Station by Mr. Thomas Cardew. Meanwhile, Algernon heads off to the country to check out Cecily, to whom he introduces himself as being her guardian Jack's brother Ernest. This meets with Ceclily's approval because in her diary she has been writing about her engagement to a man named Ernest. Then things get really interesting.
Wilde proves once and for all time that the pun can indeed be elevated to a high art form. Throughout the entire play we have the double meaning of the word "earnest," almost to the level of a conceit, since many of the play's twists and turns deal with the efforts of Jack and Algernon to be "Ernest," by lying, only to discover that circumstances makes honest men of them in the end (and of the women for that matter as well). There is every reason to believe that Wilde was making a point about earnestness being a key ideal of Victorian culture and one worthy of being thoroughly and completely mocked. Granted, some of the puns are really bad, and the discussion of "Bunburying" is so bad it is stands alone in that regard, but there is a sense in which the bad ones only make the good ones so glorious and emphasize that Wilde is at his best while playing games with the English language.
But if Wilde's puns are the low road then his epigrams represent the heights of his genius, especially when they are used by the characters in an ironic vein (e.g., "It is very romantic to be in love. But there is nothing romantic about a definite proposal" and "I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance"). Jack is the male lead, but it is Algernon who represents the ideal Wilde character, who insists he is a rebel speaking out against the institutions of society, such as marriage, but with attacks that are so flamboyant and humorous that the cleverness of the humor ends up standing apart from the inherent point.
In the end, "The Importance of Being Earnest" is the wittiest play every written, in English or any other language, and I doubt that anything written in the future will come close. Wilde was essentially a stand-up comedian who managed to create a narrative in which he could get off dozens of classic one-liners given a high-class sheen by being labeled epigrams. Like a comedian he touches on several topics, from the aristocracy, marriage, and the literary world to English manners, women, love, religion, and anything else that came to his fertile mind. But because it is done with such a lighthearted tone that the barbs remain as timely today as they were at the end of the 19th-century and "The Importance of Being Earnest" will always be at the forefront of the plays of that time which will continue to be produced.


Another small masterpiece from David Hare!Review Date: 2000-03-25


Oscar's LadyReview Date: 2000-04-13
As always, Wilde gives us an interesting little "twist" at the end of the play, just to keep us on our toes and prove again that we aren't nearly as clever as he! Wilde proves himself again with Lady Windamere's Fan-- a job well done!

Used price: $27.00

Speak..and Enlighten...Sexual AND Academic Victorian Modes..Review Date: 2002-06-29
interesting study of male desire and its effects on Victorian
culture. A major part of the focus of this study concerns
the interacting awarenesses, defenses, attacks, and
deflections of male same-sex attraction AND desire,
and the various responses to those two factors
in relation to the classical Greek writings and art
as they influenced the thoughts and creativity of
Victorian male lives, especially in the academic
centers of Cambridge and Oxford Universities.
This study is very readable, even though the
first paragraph of the "Introduction" sounds too
"academic," the rest of the Introduction explains
the focus. The author of this work, Richard Dellamora,
is working with or against various ideas
expressed in the writings of Michel Foucault [History of
Sex: Vol. 1 An Introduction; Vol. _The Use of Pleasure_],
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick [_Between Men: English Literature and
Male Homosocial Desire_], Elaine Showalter [_The Female
Malady: Women, Madness, and English Culture, 1830-1980_;
_A Literature of Their Own_]and other writers on sexuality
and gender, dealing with the Victorian period.
But this is no "he says; she says..." study. It is
truly a remarkable and incredibly insightful and
interesting, well focused and clearly presented work.
It is a very important source of knowledge and study
in its own right--this author has well studied and
knows the people, their works, and the issues and
arguments involved. He clearly and inspiringly explains
the meanings of the works, their major ideas, and the
counter ideas, and where each is focused
in its arguments. But the work is not dry reading.
Dellamora deals with male desire as it is
expressed in the works of both those male writers
whose affections and interests are focused on the male
exclusively, as well as with those males who have
sought the expression of their life association and
sexuality with women,but who have nonetheless been
aware of, been participants in, and been celebrators
of profound
male bonding desire,
even if not of a sexual nature. Indeed, Dellamora's
main argument is that the history of the presentation
of
male desire in the 19th century English cultural
context transcends the limitation imposed by the idea
that only "homosexuals"
would be aware of, feel,
or desire such male oriented caring. That idea breaks
the stereotype and opens up (liberates)
the cultural
strictures and impositions that sadly still dominate
willingness to talk of male desire and sexuality in
some
academic writings, especially in the United States.
Mr. Dellamora is professor of English and Cultural Studies
at Trent
University in Ontario [according to the back cover].
The chapter titles help to show the range and excellent
areas
of analysis by the author, who knows and uses the
writings, letters, and sources extremely well. The titles
are: Introduction-Masculine
Desire and the Question of the
Subject; (1) Tennyson, the Apostles, and _In Memoriam_; (2)
"Spousal Love" in the Poetry
of Gerard Manley Hopkins; (3)
[Walter]Pater at Oxford in 1864--Old Mortality and
"Diaphaneite"; (4) Poetic Perversities
of A. C. Swinburne;
Excursus--Hopkins, Swinburne, and the Whitmanian Signifier;
(5) [Matthew]Arnold, Winckelmann, and
[Walter] Pater;
(6) John Ruskin and the Character of Male Genius; (7)
Leonardo, Medusa, and the Wish to be Woman; (8)
"The New
Chivalry" and Oxford Politics (the contest to elect a new
Professor of Poetry at Oxford; the influences of
Walter
Pater, John Addington Symonds, and Jowett);
9)Theorizing Homophobia--Analysis of Myth in Pater;
(10) Homosexual
Scandal and Compulsory Heterosexuality
in the 1890s; Afterword--The Subject of Sexual (In)difference.
The Bibliography
at the back of this book is
exceptional, interesting, and informative (in terms of
future sources that one might wish
to consult or
purchase for one's own use). It is filled with both
essay and book entries, but all of a highly
intellectual
and culturally stimulating kind.
Dellamora presents here a thorough, well studied,
well analyzed, and totally enlightening
work. It is
well worth the purchase by any reader interested in
the subjects of male desire, cultural impact, and
artistic
expression.
His exceptional gift in this work is to use letters
and journals to show the range of feelings and
expressions
-- the letters between Arthur Hallam
to Richard Milnes and the expressions between
Tennyson and Hallam are incredibly
interesting
(as well as being something one would not be
able to easily access from other sources). The other
personages
inovlved in the Apostles and
their interests and expressions and doings
provide great insight also in understanding
more
fully the context of the cultural and personal
interactions that were going on at both Cambridge
and Oxford in the 1800s.
[Byron
and Tennyson attended Cambridge;
Pater, Hopkins (tutored by Pater), Symonds,
Ruskin, and Wilde attended Oxford.]
Notice: Dellamora uses the words which
the writers of the works and the letters use --
both Latinate and common. The
words have both
to do with bodily parts and sexual acts, so the
general reader should be aware. But none of
this
is presented in a sensationalist fashion, rather
as an enlightening insight into the thoughts and ideas
that motivated,
influenced, and found expression (or
repression) in the lives of the experiencers. This is
NOT a book about sex or
about sex acts -- it is about
ideas and desires and their influences on personal
motivations, strivings, and artistic
expressions.

Used price: $19.75
Collectible price: $125.00

Gyles Brandreth, "Oscar Wilde and the Ring of Death"Review Date: 2008-06-29
In the book, Mr Wilde is the toast of London's high society. His "Lady Windermere's Fan" is a critical and box-office success, and his popularity is unmatched amongst the cognoscenti. One evening, at an exclusive "Sunday Supper Club" dinner with such friends as Arthur Conan Doyle, Bram Stoker, and Robert Sherard (who also narrates the story), Wilde introduces a parlor game involving a list of people that his guests would secretly like to kill. From the next day onward, each person on the "hit list" dies mysteriously, in the very order with which his or her name showed up during the dinner. Wilde, Conan Doyle, and Sherard begin to investigate independently, especially after failing to enlist the help of Scotland Yard . . . and especially since Wilde's name itself appears on the "hit list!" Their ensuing adventures are as jolly as they are thrilling.
Mr Brandreth's characters stay with you throughout the reading of the book. I like the way that he imbues beauty in every character, even those who Oscar Wilde considers "ugly" ("He is grotesque. Speak to him, Robert. I cannot") and who Robert Sherard abhors ("He was too charming, too intelligent, too well- and widely-read"). The sensual characters coexist with the virtuous, and they all stand out.
But it is in his profound knowledge of Oscar Wilde that Mr Brandreth shines. I am not sure of any other novelist who can match his ability to drop this much Wildesque one-liners ("It is sweet to think that one day I will serve to grow tulips") and add-on information ("It's called parsley." "Correctly known as 'petroselinum'"). Mix that with terrific wit and story-telling shrewdness, and you have an entertaining writer and a sensational book. I do not think that "Oscar Wilde and the Ring of Fire" is necessarily part of a series you read in order. I picked up the book from Kolkata's Starmark Bookstore with no prior knowledge of Mr Brandreth and his murder series, and I did not notice the need to read the prequel. However, I shall move on to the other books. Oscar Wilde and Gyles Brandreth are certainly worth the time.

Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $32.59

Oscar Wilde's Wild, Wild LondonReview Date: 1999-10-19

Masterful!Review Date: 2005-03-11
Smith and Helfand haved used Wilde's entries in his commonplace book and Oxford notebooks (1878-79) to demonstrate that his wide reading at Oxford was not isolated to that period of his life. A commonplace book, for the uninitiated, is not exactly a class notebook, but a serious repository of ideas that were written down and organized with the idea of improving upon them in future writing. This is what Wilde's commonplace book is. Smith and Helfand demonstrate how Wilde took many of these ideas with him into his later writings. It is a good example of a very traditional method of Bildung, or cultural and intellectual formation. For those who would read Wilde as a serious writer whose literary career followed a thread (many threads) from beginning to end, here is the book for you.
The erudition required for editing a book such as this, is a great task, one that the editors have accomplished with skill. This work was edited in the wake of queer studies, when the reductively mythical presentations of Wilde as gay martyr were annexed to the needs of a burgeoning academic community. It is perhaps due to this circumstance that little attention has been devoted to the scholar Oscar Wilde, and much more to Wilde hagiography. Smith and Helfand are concerned with Wilde's intellectual career, and they have contributed vitally to the recuperation of an identity smeared like an inkblot across the pages of intellectual history.
What is most formidable about this research is that it is not splattered with the ideas of poststructuralist writers, which would inevitably date the book. Smith and Helfand use the editing principles of Tanselle, but their commentary is derived from straightforward readings of original texts. It certainly destined to remain a classic in Wilde studies for a long time to come. Those interested in Foucault's concept of the technology of the self as history of writing practices may find this work helpful. Historians of evolution writing may be interested in the integration and arrangement of entries in the notebooks. Wilde wrote synthetically. He brought together ideas from Victorian writers as far afield as Spencer and Green, Huxley and Arnold, Darwin and Newman, etc. Many of Wilde's gretest aphorisms are located and his passion for the Greek Classics is present on nearly every page.


A compelling tribute to his life and worksReview Date: 2001-05-23

Used price: $109.32

Brilliant scholarReview Date: 2005-07-24
Related Subjects: Works Quotations
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
Wilde believed in art for art's own sake, which explains why he emphasized beauty while his contemporaries were dealing with the problems of industrial England. "The Importance of Being Earnest" is set among the upper class, making fun of their excesses and absurdities while imbuing them with witty banter providing a constant stream of epigrams. The play's situation is simple in its unraveling complexity. Algernon Moncrieff is an upper-class English bachelor who is visited by his friend Jack Worthing, who is known as "Ernest." Jack has come to town to propose to Gwendolen Fairfax, the daugher of the imposing Lady Bracknell and Algy's first cousin. Jack has a ward named Cecily who lives in the country while Algernon has an imaginary friend named "Bunbury" whom he uses as an excuse to get out of social engagements.
Jack proposes to Gwendolen but has two problems. First, Gwendolen is wiling to agree because his name is Ernest, a name that "seems to inspire absolute confidence," but which, of course, is not his true Christian name. Second, Lady Bracknell objects to Jack as a suitor when she learns he was abandoned by his parents and found in a handbag in Victoria Station by Mr. Thomas Cardew. Meanwhile, Algernon heads off to the country to check out Cecily, to whom he introduces himself as being her guardian Jack's brother Ernest. This meets with Ceclily's approval because in her diary she has been writing about her engagement to a man named Ernest. Then things get really interesting.
Wilde proves once and for all time that the pun can indeed be elevated to a high art form. Throughout the entire play we have the double meaning of the word "earnest," almost to the level of a conceit, since many of the play's twists and turns deal with the efforts of Jack and Algernon to be "Ernest," by lying, only to discover that circumstances makes honest men of them in the end (and of the women for that matter as well). There is every reason to believe that Wilde was making a point about earnestness being a key ideal of Victorian culture and one worthy of being thoroughly and completely mocked. Granted, some of the puns are really bad, and the discussion of "Bunburying" is so bad it is stands alone in that regard, but there is a sense in which the bad ones only make the good ones so glorious and emphasize that Wilde is at his best while playing games with the English language.
But if Wilde's puns are the low road then his epigrams represent the heights of his genius, especially when they are used by the characters in an ironic vein (e.g., "It is very romantic to be in love. But there is nothing romantic about a definite proposal" and "I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance"). Jack is the male lead, but it is Algernon who represents the ideal Wilde character, who insists he is a rebel speaking out against the institutions of society, such as marriage, but with attacks that are so flamboyant and humorous that the cleverness of the humor ends up standing apart from the inherent point.
In the end, "The Importance of Being Earnest" is the wittiest play every written, in English or any other language, and I doubt that anything written in the future will come close. Wilde was essentially a stand-up comedian who managed to create a narrative in which he could get off dozens of classic one-liners given a high-class sheen by being labeled epigrams. Like a comedian he touches on several topics, from the aristocracy, marriage, and the literary world to English manners, women, love, religion, and anything else that came to his fertile mind. But because it is done with such a lighthearted tone that the barbs remain as timely today as they were at the end of the 19th-century and "The Importance of Being Earnest" will always be at the forefront of the plays of that time which will continue to be produced.