Works Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250


VariableReview Date: 2008-08-31
Too much fun for such a serious bookReview Date: 2008-06-17
no surpriseReview Date: 2007-11-09
Great book about your brain and your body in the worldReview Date: 2006-08-28
Sapolsky, who is the author of A Primate's Memoir, The Trouble with Testosterone and Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers, is a professor of biology and neurology at Stanford and a recipient of a MacArthur "genius" grant. I found his genius not only to be in his insight and ability to frame questions and pursue their answers, but also to be able to write about it in a way that is accessible to a "nongenius."
This book is a collection of previously published essays that are updated for this edition (the updates include notes for further reading and on source materials). Sapolsky divides the book into three parts ("Genes and Who We Are," "Our Bodies and Who We Are" and "Society and Who We Are") and introduces each section with cogent current thinking on the issues addressed. For example, to introduce the first section, Sapolsky writes about how the nature-nurture argument is a red herring; genes contribute to personality/behavior when the environment interacts with them in ways conducive to gene-induced behavior! For example, in "Of Mice and (Hu)men Genes," Sapolsky writes about genes that may indicate a proclivity for depression, but only in certain environments, and summarizes that the reader should be wary of simple expanations. (And, he asserts, as humans we may have more responsibility to create positive environments that interact benignly with risky genes than to understand which genes cause what.) In the second section's "Why are Dreams Dreamlike?" Sapolsky illustrates how answering some questions about how the brain and psyche function just brings up other, deeper questions.
Sapolsky's illustrations of his points are fascinating and enlightening (and often funny!). In "The Genetic War Between Men and Women," he writes about how the genes from the father of a species have one goal ("greater, faster, more expensive growth") while genes from the mother have another ("countering that exuberance"). The success comes in nature's ability to balance these goals: "The placenta is ... the scene of a pitched battle, with paternally derived genes pushing [the placenta] to invade more aggressively while maternally derived genes try to hold it back." He lists other examples of this balance in humans and other species. This view of nature and how reproduction is nurtured fascinated me and helped me to see things in a new way.
Sapolsky's topics are wide ranging, and the book reminded me a bit of Freakonomics in its tendency to turn its problem-solving focus on whatever issue crossed its path. For example, in the final section, he writes about the differences between the
religions of desert peoples and the religions of tropical peoples -- the former tend to have a single god with miltaristic iterations and few rights for women while the latter tend toward pantheism and matrilocal marital residence. "Most evidence suggests that the rain-forest mind-set is more of a hothouse attribute, less hardy when uprooted." I guess that's evident, but Sapolsky's writings on the topic, again, gave me a new way to look at something I hadn't considered before. In this book, he addresses game theory, gene mapping, musical tastes, gender-communication issues and neurogenesis with wit, clarity and insight.
I recommend this book if you're the least bit curious about your brain, your body, the natural world and the society in which you live.
DelightfulReview Date: 2006-10-16

Used price: $4.08

Very helpful.Review Date: 2008-10-03
I'm so grateful for finding this bookReview Date: 2008-10-02
Hope finally!!!Review Date: 2008-07-22
I had talked to other mothers with PPD, but I always felt that they couldn't relate, that my Postpartum Depression was different. Needless to say I felt very lonely and isolated. I read the book and I found women that I could identify with. For the first time in a long, long time, I didn't feel so alone anymore, and even better I had HOPE again. The road to recovery was still long and hard, but I knew that there was light at the end of the tunnel and that I could beat this horrible disease.
HelpfulReview Date: 2008-04-06
Soooo helpfulReview Date: 2007-11-08

Just what I expected!!Review Date: 2008-06-24
We love Mouse SoupReview Date: 2007-11-09
FUN AND EXCITINGReview Date: 2007-07-20
WELL THOUGHTOUT AND WELL ILLUSTRATED BOOKReview Date: 2006-12-14
Kid Tested and Approved - a review of "Mouse Soup"Review Date: 2007-09-26
But my 5 y.o. informs me that I don't know what I am talking about. This book is great, he told me. And he convinced me that this was true by doing something his active little self seldom does: he went and got the book off his shelf and dragged his father over to the couch so that dad could listen to him read the stories. [Could have knocked me over with bookmark.]
The AR Reading level for this book is 2.4 which means that the Accelerated Reading committee, and it's software, suggests this book for Second Graders in their fourth month of school.
[The AR designation is a general "guide" that rates books on a relative scale of difficulty. Children can certainly read at levels above or below their group range, so that this number should only be used as a aid to help choose books that are appropriate and not frustrating.]
Four Stars. This book has a mouse cum Scheherazade premise: A weasel captures a poor little mouse and the mouse plots to get out of being eaten by telling stories. The stories the mouse tells didn't appeal to me, but my five y.o. son sure liked them. The AR reading level indicates the book is suitable for Second Graders.

Used price: $1.03

Good InfoReview Date: 2008-02-29
Mutiple Sclerosis Q & A: Researching Answers to Frequently Asked QuestionsReview Date: 2008-01-25
MS Q&AReview Date: 2007-01-04
Good ReferenceReview Date: 2006-11-16
helpful book for ms patientsReview Date: 2006-11-04

Used price: $0.81

Loved ItReview Date: 2007-08-15
Inspiring is an understatement...Review Date: 2006-09-08
My soul said to meReview Date: 2005-11-27
That's just how interesting this book is. Fascinating to me was the fact that with each page I read, I found my own thoughts or a proof of the things I already knew .
I spent the last 6 years with communicating with prisoners in America. Often it is hard to believe what's going on in these places. Some people may find it hard to believe what Mr Roberts has to tell within this book but I can assure everybody that everything you read is true and based on real life .
Mr Roberts changed his whole life for to bring some changes to a few people .I hope everyone who reads this book gets an idea of how serious the criminal and justice problem in America really is and starts to help to make a change
PS: For everyone from Germany , you can order the book by amazon.de.
A human take on a complex subjectReview Date: 2004-11-24
An inspiring journey for all to takeReview Date: 2004-01-08

Very thorough, but sometimes, too muchReview Date: 2007-12-26
The arrangement of this set is by English not Greek words. But the fourth volume provides an index to where the discussion on Greek words can be found.
For each entry, the English word is given in bold, then the basic Greek word in a box. Then variant forms of the Greek word are given and synonymous Greek words, each with an English equivalent. Then the main article begins with a discussion of the use of the word(s) in classical literature. Then there's a discussion of the usages of the word(s) in the LXX translation of the Hebrew, OT, often indicating what Hebrew word the LXX was translating, and finally is the discussion of the usage on the NT.
So lots of information is presented, and if you read through the entire article for a word, you will definitely gain full knowledge of the history and usage of the word. However, the thoroughness of this set can sometimes be a drawback. It is just too much information and takes too long to read through. Most of the time when studying a word, you don't need that much background, so standard lexicons, like the ones on the BibleWorks 7 software program, provide sufficient info.
But that said, I am glad I purchased this set when I did. I didn't refer to it that often in my translation work, but on the occasions that I did, it helped to clarify how to translate a particular word.
For instance, some claim that "porneia" only refers to prostitution. The article in volume one of this set explains that this was originally the sense of the word. However, by the time of Christ, "porneia" referred to any kind of sexual intercourse outside of a Biblically lawful marriage (pp. 497-501). As such, I rendered this as word as "sexual sin" with the alternative translation of "fornication." I explain in more detail the reasons for these renderings in the Glossary contained in the Companion Volume to the Analytical-Literal Translation: Third Edition. The information for that glossary entry was mainly taken from the article in this set.
This set is also helpful when working on articles for my Web site. And it would be helpful in sermon preparation.
All that said, this volume is rather expensive. So only get it if you really think you will need in-depth word studies for transition work, sermon preparation, and the like. Less expensive lexicons and software programs will provide sufficient information for less serious Bible studies.
Best dictionary if you are light on Greek, but want to learn it.Review Date: 2007-11-23
Before acquiring this work, I wrestled with `Theological Dictionary of the New Testament', edited in German and completed around 1933 by Gerhard Kittel, and translated into English by Geoffrey W. Bromiley, which has 10 huge volumes filled with a wealth of information, except that everything is organized by original Greek terms, and my reading of Greek is simply not up to snuff yet. So, while I have never been disappointed by this resource, it is simply too clumsy to use for the quick check on a meaning.
Brown's translation, on the other hand is marvelously organized by English words, with a transliteration of the Greek into English characters, followed by the original Greek script. Super, when the term you want is one of the major terms. A fly enters the ointment when the term you want is secondary to a more common word. I ran into this situation when I tried to look up `mute' (kophos) which my annotated Bibles told me could bean both deaf and dumb. Well, there was simply nothing there in volume 2 (G - Pre) under `mute'. By this means, I discovered the great value of Volume 4, the `Indexes'. `mute' was here in abundance, with the primary entry (within the entry for `dumb') highlighted, and I was merrily on my way.
I discovered an even greater value to this work when I looked up `hypocrisy', to help me understand the use of the word in Luke (who happens to use if far less frequently than Matthew). A recent lecture on Matthew stated that `hypocrisy' didn't mean the same to the ancients as it does to us. I did not entirely trust this observation. As I stated above, this Dictionary gives at least three different interpretations of words, one for classical Greek, one for Old Testament (LXX) Greek, and one for New Testament Greek. Well, classical Greek did mean an actor or explainer of narrative in dramas who may have performed with a mask. But usage in the Synoptics is virtually identical to our modern meaning. Even better, Luke's quote of Jesus may even been a metaphor using both meanings, one who explains as well as one who does not believe what they preach.
I was even more pleased with the book when it confirmed an interpretation I had of Luke's use of `yeast', which disagreed with the notes in my study bible. Brown, et. al. even went so far as to point out the common mis-interpretation of `yeast' in this context.
You may be using `Vines Complete Expository Dictionary', which puts everything in a single volume and is keyed to Strong's concordances. I've used Vines often, but I also often find this book light on interpretations in all parts of scripture. Vines is good, but this set of four smallish volumes is better for quick, but discriminating reference. Of course, it also has all the usual scholarly doo-dads, which are great, but not as important as the sound, discerning interpretations.
very pleasedReview Date: 2006-02-21
A Must!Review Date: 2006-10-19
The transliteration of the Greek is the only draw-back to this work as personally I prefer the Greek terms and in the Greek word order.Allow me to explain why. I do not use the NIV, though I know it to be a trustworthy translation, thus I tend to come directly from the Greek text to this. Thus I usually find the term, I am searching, in the transliterated indexed 4th volume. So if this was in the Greek word order and untransliterated it would prove easier. But enough of my crying! It IS WORTHY TO BE PURCHASED!
I also supplement this set with 'Theological Lexicon of The New Testament' by Ceslas Spicq, which tends to develop words the NIDNNT and Kittle have omitted. The TLNT is in the Greek word order and untransliterated, so it may feel odd to some who are not yet aquainted with the Greek.
Without question purchase the NIDNNT prior to the TLNT by Spicq as you will gain far more use from it.
soli deo gloria
Great, but the abridged version is better, so is SpicqReview Date: 2007-01-16
I've used DNTT for years. I always come away from reading articles quite edified. It's a tremendous resource. It's so good I overlook it's organizational faults.
However, consider the following:
Zondervan quietly put out an abridged version of this. Nothing important is missing! See my review of the New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology - Abridged Edition here on Amazon for more details. That is only $23, while this four volume set is $93. That uses the odd English based organizing system, the abridged is easier to use and all words are listed in Greek word order. They crammed the information into one volume by shrinking the type (still plenty big), moving to a double column format, and making the book taller and deeper than the original size. Read more about it at my review.
If you are considering this set, you may want to consider the abridged instead. When I've used the abridged, I never feel cheated because they kept all the relevant stuff! I have all the major theological dictionaries of the NT (TDNT, DNTT, Exegetical Dictionary of the NT, and Spicq's TNLT) and I use them routinely. I'm telling you that the Abridged version of this is not a kiddie version. It's the real thing. It's the best kept secret in scholarly resources for the NT! Don't feel like you're slighting yourself by getting the abridged, you're not. Now the abridged Kittel's, by contrast, is a different story. That was a serious abridgement and a serious compromise of the original. I sold that on eBay. I retain and use the original.
A great supplement to this set (or the abridged version) is Spicq's Theological Lexicon of the New Testament. See my review of that. It is far more theologically refreshing and insightful than either this set or TDNT (EDNT is the most bland, but it has its strengths).
May God bless you in your pursuit of a greater understanding of Holy Scripture.

BrilliantReview Date: 2008-10-04
The same yesterday, today, foreverReview Date: 2008-08-18
AthanasiusReview Date: 2008-02-23
A great introductory work to the early church fathers.Review Date: 2007-12-17
Second, the book is not terribly difficult to read. The book is short and well organized. Some of the passages take rereadings, but the arguments for the most part are fairly straight forward and accessible. Meditating on what God did through the incarnation, the reasons for the incarnation, and its impact on our lives and history as a whole can not be a bad thing.
Great Book, So-so TranslationReview Date: 2006-10-09

Used price: $7.48

How True!Review Date: 2003-04-14
of the things in the book. It's an easy read and you get into quickly. It's amazing how true it is and makes you think!
There is a reason why we do things that harm ourselves...Review Date: 2002-11-18
If you want to IMPROVE your HEALTH and living quality , you OUGHT to read this book!
The Origin Of IllnessReview Date: 2002-11-06
In a very thin volume Dr Keppe explains the absolute root of all collective and individual malaise whether it be psychological, social or physical.
Origin of Illness offers to the reader an appreciation of the insidious effects in all our lives of the phenomenon of Envy, an attitude prevailing almost universally which is nothing but a useless refusal of all that is good and beautiful and worthy in our lives and in the lives of others.
Don't underestimate Envy, for Envy ITSELF is total underestimation; a tragedy in waiting for all who suffer it.
Dr Keppe explains the mechanics of Envy itself explaining that it is an attitude of denial and as such is not directly perceived save by its effects. Dr Keppe continues in his exposition to explain that so abominable are the effects of Envy in our own consciousness that we seek constantly to erase all awareness of them, even projecting them onto others so that we may feel 'free from stain'.
Dr Keppe clearly elaborates how consciousness is not as 'negotiable' as we think and that we cannot, as we believe avoid the effects in our lives of what we don't wish to perceive. In fact to believe that awareness can be negotiated is ENVY itself.
The Glory of this little book is the unveiling of the fact that our very resistance to consciousness of the effects of our Envy is the source of all our illnesses.
As the book explains, Envy can be the reason we do not 'get' the message of the book. Knowing this we are forced to admit that any uneasiness we feel about the content is affirming the content itself.
This Work is Dr Keppe's compassionate gift to all of us. It is a life changing book, a book which will answer many previously paradoxical conundrums in the lives of those who read it.
A thin book this may be---and Envy will lead us to believe that it contains a thin message, while a careful and humble attention to the contents will even save lives.
Envy definedReview Date: 2003-08-01
The most striking thing about Analytical Trilogy is that its basis is clearly a secularized version of Catholic Theology. A.T.'s essence is Keppe's broad definition of "Envy", a dead ringer for the Catholic doctrine of Original Sin. ( I say the Catholic doctrine because, while the Protestant Reformers also taught Original Sin, their definition was quite different.) In fact, Dr. Keppe twice in the book uses the term original sin in connection with Envy.
The alalogy hold up quite well with A.T.'s "consciousness" equivalent to Catholic "conscience", the is, the ability to distinguish good from evil.
Although strictly speaking the analogy ends there, but one can't help but see the Keppean psychoanalyst as a replacement for the priest in the confessional.
Also, one wonders where all the needed pschooanalysts the world needs are to come from.
Keppe clearly sees A.T. as the only solution to the problem of envy and inversion with the accompanying problems of delusional projection.
The low pointof the book can be found on pages 94-95 where Keppe gratutitously offers an unsupported and, in my view,unsupportable, attach on the crusades, the 1991 Iraq (incorrectly called Iran) War, and Clinton's denunciation of Brazilian child labor. I suggest this attack has more to do with Dr. Keppe's own feelings about authority figures (in this case the popes and presidents) than any psychopathology of the accused. Projection?
The A.T. system itself because of its fundamentally moral views strikes me a more acceptable approach to Christians in need of psychoanalysis than traditional Freudian approaches. The book itself does a good job of explaining why.
This book is fundamental reading for anyone!Review Date: 2002-10-29
In "The Origin of Illness" Keppe describes the three stages that lead us all to these conflicts and difficulties, and how through consciousness of this vicious circle we can improve our lives, our relationships and society. The author gives many practical examples, which we all can relate to, including excerpts from a number of his client's analysis sessions.
The first part of the book deals with the fundamental human problem, which is envy. This deep and hidden envy which is in everyone, to a greater or lesser degree, makes us blind to all that is good and beautiful in life, and consequently hinders or even destroys, all opportunity for development and progress.
The second part of the book addresses our fear of perceiving and dealing with our shortcomings. Keppe explains that the problem isn't having a problem, but in not seeing the problem. And this is our dilemma: how can we solve our problems when we do not admit that they exist?
The final section of the book deals with projection, which is the process of seeing all of our own problems or qualities in other people and things. Because of our enormous resistance to self-knowledge, we turn our eyes to the external world in an attempt to ignore our internal psychological life. Instead of seeing that the cause of the dissatisfaction is inside of me, for example, I blame my partner, my parents, my workmates, the city in which I live, etc. Projection is the cause of human conflicts, and the end result is that we to lose contact with reality and ourselves.
This book gives a whole new expansive perspective of the psychopathology of the human being and the civilization we have built. It provides answers to the question of why we experience so little true happiness in our lives and why we destroy the good in ourselves, each other and life in general.

Used price: $6.97

Essential reference, with only slight problems.Review Date: 2008-03-29
The book for the World War IIReview Date: 2008-02-12
Correction to "page count" comment in earlier reviewReview Date: 2007-04-23
However, the new edition is also a bit easier to read despite the smaller size, because the new edition uses a glossy paper and the text seems more sharply defined on the page. This is particularly noticeable in the text of the maps, which I have struggled to read in the first edition, but seem clearer in the new edition.
As an aside, I agree with the general view that this is the single best reference book on World War II. I can't really tell what is changed in the new edition, although it may just be minor corrections, since the several longer articles I have compared seem identical.
The Facts about WWII without the SpinReview Date: 2006-06-26
A Cautionary NoteReview Date: 2006-09-10
In the case of The Oxford Companion to Music, there was a beautiful, lavishly illustrated edition of 2,017 pages of 1983; it was replaced by a revised edition in 2002 that had 1,434 pages---a whopping loss of almost 600 pages of material. In this case I know what I'm talking about, because I have both editions: the 2002 edition represents a substantial abridgement and cheapening of the 1986 edition; I doubt that anyone who had the chance to compare the two would choose the newer edition.
I don't know if the same thing is going on with this Oxford Companion to World War Two (I don't have the new edition at hand to compare the two), but the loss of 23% of the material in the first edition, and my experience with The Oxford Companion to Music described above, would incline me to approach the new edition with caution.

Used price: $55.55
Collectible price: $155.00

The Wonderful Art of Patrick DemarchelierReview Date: 2002-12-13
Extremely Good PhotographyReview Date: 2002-02-05
Beautiful Display of photographyReview Date: 2001-07-20
BeautifulReview Date: 2000-06-23
Superb Portraits!Review Date: 2001-03-14
Before going further, let me observe that the book contains much female nudity that would earn an "R" rating if this were a motion picture.
Glenn O'Brien in the book's introduction captures the essence of the book well, "The beauty standard is being raised once again."
Whether the subjects are beautiful (and many are) or not, the result is the same -- a deep look into the personality and character of the model done in large, vivid detail in wonderfully contrasting duotone. One of the best tests for this book is to compare the celebrity images you see here with others you have seen of these same people. These images are more warm, more revealing, and more fun to see. Mr. Demarchelier has a light touch that gets out the happiest version of a person. You'll find yourself laughing and smiling your way through this collection, for sure.
The portraits displayed here are uniformly of very high quality, and provide nice contrasts of subjects (nose rings, boulders, children, and elephants among the beautiful people).
Here are some of my many favorites:
Nude, St. Barthelemy, 1994
Nude, St. Barthelemy, 1989
Her Royal Highness, The Princess of Wales, London, 1993
Warren Beatty, Annette Bening and their daughter, Los Angeles, 1994
Versailles gardens, Versailles, France, 1994
Gianni Versace, Paris, 1992
Nude, New York, 1995
Corbassiere, Paris, 1994
Helena Christensen, New York, 1992 (second image)
Cindy Crawford, Leh, India, 1989
Jasper Johns and Leo Castelli, New York, 1993
Roy Lichtenstein, New York, 1993
Naomi Campbell, New York, 1990
Isabella Rosselini, New York, 1994
Robin Williams (4), New York, 1990
Robert De Niro, New York, 1990
Sisters, St. Barthelemy, 1991
Christy Turlington, New York, 1990
Alice Dodd, New York, 1994
Natasha Kinski, New York, 1993
Warren Beatty from "Dick Tracy," Los Angeles, 1989
Elton John, Paris, 1992
Janet Jackson, Miami, Florida, 1993
Arthur Demarchelier, New York, 1991
Patrick and Mia Demarchelier and their three sons, New York, 1987
Meg Ryan, New York, 1994
Claudia Schiffer, St. Barthelemy, 1991
Paul Newman, Beacon, New York, 1994
Elle Macpherson, New York, 1990
Cindy Crawford, New York, 1990
After you look closely at these images, notice how lines and flaws provide balance and perspective in the same way that perfect figures provide proportion. How can you create more waves of enjoyable symmetry?
Drink deeply from the bubbling joy of humanity!
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
He mentions one interesting study (Cunningham and Russell, "Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard)) which questions sexual selection arguments put forward by Geoffrey Miller and others about animals selecting mates with better genes. The study shows that female Mallards produce stronger offspring after mating with more attractive males because they invest more resources in those eggs, rather than because of anything that seems connected to the genes provided by the males.
He helps explain the attraction of gambling by describing experiments which show larger dopamine releases due to rewards that are most uncertain (the subject thinks they have a 50% chance of happening) than is released when there's more certainty (e.g. either a 25% chance or a 75% chance) of the same reward.
One place where I was disappointed was when he described "repressive personalities", which he made seem quite similar to Aspergers, and made me wonder whether I fit his description. "dislike novelty"? My reaction to novelty is sufficiently context-dependent that any answer is plausible. "prefer structure and predictability"? Yes and usually. "poor at expressing emotions or at reading the nuances of emotions in other people"? That's me. "can tell you what they're having for dinner two weeks from Thursday"? I could probably predict 5 days in advance with 50% accuracy, so I'm probably closer than most people. So I Googled and found another description (mentioning the same researcher that Sapolsky mentioned) in the Sciences and find descriptions of "repressive personality" that seem wildly different from me ("a strong personal need for social conformity" and "agreement with statements framed as absolutes, statements loaded with the words never and always"). Who wrote this competing description? Wait, it's the same Sapolsky! It looks like his current description reuses a small piece of an older article with inadequate thought to whether it's complete enough.