William King Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250

Used price: $1.00

SHALL THE DEAD RULE THE LIVING?Review Date: 2008-05-31
Excellent tale of tragedy and redemptionReview Date: 2008-02-15
Francis Phelan is FascinatingReview Date: 2008-01-22
A masterpiece. Review Date: 2007-12-31
It has been reviewed beautifully here and I cannot add anything new to what has been written. This book should be on everyone's must read list, and in my opinion is one of the finest books written in the last century.
They 're not really bums at all Review Date: 2007-07-03
Kennedy tells the story of those of one group of inhabitants of the Tri- City world, the 'bums'the drinking Irish , a group I in my childhood felt so threatened by and alien from.
He however sees them from inside, humanizes them, makes them understandable and even sympathetic. He writes about them with precise unsentimental care and attention, love, perhaps.
Francis Phelan the wanderer who returns home at the end of this work, the man who has left his family has his story told with unpitying realism. The other dropouts, losers from conventional society including his female companion of nine years Helen, the Vassar girl whose mother cheated her out of her inheritance and future, also have their stories told in harsh, tough, often mean dialogue. There is a power and spirit in the writing that is hard to describe. I would not actually say the book is funny or even humorous. And in fact many of the realities are truly grim and even cruel. But there is in the overall motion of the work a kind of positive, strong, life- affirming spirit. And the work has a number of incredibly moving passages.

Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $24.00

Hard to put downReview Date: 2006-09-18
Movie script good.Review Date: 2006-03-04
Not worth the hard cover
difficult to put awayReview Date: 2005-09-14
King Con is a winnerReview Date: 2005-09-23
This is an incredible story . . .Review Date: 2004-06-25

Used price: $2.33
Collectible price: $26.99

wildly entertainingReview Date: 2008-05-18
another hitReview Date: 2008-04-27
The "good old days" weren't that good!Review Date: 2008-02-27
Great idea, but...Review Date: 2008-04-24
Interesting material but not well writtenReview Date: 2008-03-29

Collectible price: $10.00

Moves slow, but good bookReview Date: 2007-12-23
Not Free SF ReaderReview Date: 2007-09-03
Arthur. This book basically starts with the birth of the boy, and
features his childhood.
This series is still about Merlin, though. Merlin travels, but
still arranges to be around Arthur to teach him, as well as dreaming of
the sword, Caliburn, or Excalibur.
the 2nd of 4Review Date: 2007-05-14
This book is followed up with The Last Enchantment (The Arthurian Saga, Book 3)
Doesn't measure up.Review Date: 2005-12-21
Legendary trilogy about a legendary kingReview Date: 2006-09-07

Used price: $0.01

The unplayable playReview Date: 2007-01-21
Reversing our point of view toward the 'Justice'Review Date: 2005-12-16
In my opinion, to reach the axiomatically righteous conclusion, we should reverse pur point of view toward the 'Justice'. It is a transformation of way of our thinking. Therefore, I recommend rhis masterpiece for someone who aspire to ponder about our human being's viewpoint.
Context is the king of this comedy!Review Date: 2006-03-15
Shakespeare intended that the actions taken by Antonio, by Shylock, by Bassanio, and even by Portia be seen as comically extreme. Antonio goes to the lengths of seeking help from a man he despises to help a man he loves. Shylock demands nothing but justice, even when the demands of the agreement he made is met and even doubled. Everywhere in this play is there action taken to the extreme.
Only a refusal to acknowledge the historical context would be blind to the comedy. There are stage plays, television shows, and screenplays aplenty which follow the example set forth in MERCHANT OF VENICE, showing how comical people can be when their actions are taken to the extreme. If MERCHANT OF VENICE can be view in THIS context, then the comedy shines through.
As a writer, I find it comical that anyone would use MERCHANT OF VENICE to point the finger of "racism" at Shakespeare. Part of a writer's challenge is to present convincingly views even he or she disagrees with. The best writer would try to dismantle and disprove the very beliefs he or she holds dear. That Shakespeare has often been judged a racist based on his portrayal of Shylock serves only as testimony to the continuing success of this play. Shylock's speech, complimented by another reviewer, is ample proof that Shakespeare's own views are well hid. Shylock's speech demonstrates magnificently that Shakespeare was able to get inside the head of any man (or woman) in his stories and write the words which that man would speak, faithfully render the thoughts which that man would think, have that man act as only that man would act, and all of it be believable. Simply put, unless you knew beforehand a writer's views on any subject, it would be difficult to find the needle of truth in his or her haystack of fiction if that writer has done their job well, and in this case Shakespeare was damned near flawless!
It is true that the movie, starring Al Pacino, does not present this play as a comedy, but that hardly detracts from its excellence. It shows, in fact, that MERCHANT OF VENICE plays well as both a drama and a comedy. In our age, however, given the importance of religious tolerance, I'll admit that it is probably best played as a drama.
As for the Pelican series of Shakespeare's plays, they are an excellent resource for anyone wanting to read and study the Bard's work. I've several volumes in this series and hope to eventually own them all. Each volume contains two identical essays, "The Theatrical World" (which provides a good understanding of the historical context, as well as an idea of just how much we know about Shakespeare as an individual) and "The Texts of Shakespeare" (which gives more historical context and also discusses some of the difficulties which editors have experienced in presenting these plays in print to modern audiences). There is then an introduction to each play, which is best left unread until afterwards if you aren't familiar with the play. The footnotes are few, but well-chosen, and do help in understanding words and phrases whose meanings have changed over the centuries.
Time has made Merchant into a tragedyReview Date: 2005-12-06
Antonio gladly spits upon Shylock and calls him a dog, but stunningly, when Antonio finds himself in a financial pinch he goes to Shylock for money. More brash is Antonio's promise to act the same in the future: "I am as like to call thee so again, / To spet on thee again, to spurn thee, too." (1.3.127-28) From this point on, sympathy for Antonio is paralyzed in a modern reader's mind, from reminders of past images, from slavery and anti-Semitism, where the dehumanizing of a group of people is accepted by a society. The entire text afterward reads like an indictment of humanity, as if Shakespeare is making the Elizabethans laugh at their own behavior.
In perhaps the best argument in Shylock's defense in the trial, he point out the fact that those who speak of mercy own slaves. "What judgment shall I dread, doing no wrong? / You have among you many a purchased slave." (4.1.89-90) Shylock, as fanatical as he is over the pound of flesh, is asking for only a pound of a man, when the slaveholders own the entire person. The play is littered with prejudiced remarks that clearly show how animalistic Shylock was to them.
Every conversation involving Shylock has ridicule from the Christians, without remorse or a feeling of comedy. The Christian children are taught to mock Shylock, they run after him in the street. The merchants spit on him, the Duke reviles him, his daughter renounces her religion and robs him.
Still an amazing story, with a few of the best on mercy and prejudice ever written.
Shakespeare's Comedy/Tragedy of Marriage and its InterrelationshipsReview Date: 2006-03-22
Before the actual text of the play which is wisely presented on the right hand page with explanatory notes (metaphors, allusions, similes, etc.) facing on the left hand page (words and phrases are defined by scholars based on their usage during Shakespeare's time; if scholars are inconclusive as to meaning, the word `uncertain' is used to connote this disagreement), the usual `Reading Shakespeare's Language', `Shakespeare's Life', `Shakespeare's Theatre', `Publication of Shakespeare's Plays' and `Introduction to the Text' introduce the reader to the Shakespearean world. Following the text, an essay by Alexander Leggatt follows illuminating `The Merchant of Venice' for the modern reader. In addition, an eleven page `Further Reading' list pinpoints books and essays on topics like the play itself, Shakespeare, the time in which he lived and the Globe Theatre. Rounding out the vital information is a three page "Key to Famous Lines and Phrases" complete with speaker and verse notation.
As far as the play itself, I will keep my remarks limited, saying only that for the modern audience, Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice" borders on the provocative. All with politically correct upbringing or today's cultural sensitivity training cannot help but focus on the reigning prejudice of the early Medieval and Renaissance time period, namely the exclusion of Jews from all forms of normal life since mainstream thought withheld that this race was primarily responsible for Christ's crucifixion.
Indeed, today's reader will pose the question as to whether or not this play should be deemed more tragedy than comedy and must remember that as a comedy, "The Merchant of Venice" focuses on marriage, couples (Bassanio/Portia, Lorenzo/Jessica, Gratiano/Nerissa) and their emotional and financial interrelationships and uses sly humor and innuendo to poke fun at Venice's societal `outsiders'(Shylock, Morocco, Aragorn and in a lesser sense Antonio) who do not form a Shakespearean couple per se. Looked at from this perspective, the character of Shylock becomes simply the play's foremost societal outcast, in spite of the famous speech where he asks seemingly so poignantly, "If you prick us, do we not bleed?"
Bottom line: Shakespeare is Shakespeare. If your modern sensibilities are offended by Shakespeare's treatment of Shylock the Jew, the Prince of Morocco and the Prince of Aragorn and question the unhappy and solitary Antonio's intense feelings for Bassanio, simply keep in mind that the world at that time looked at such things differently. Within the definition of comedy, this play with its multitude of lovely speeches and images works well indeed. The New Folger Library edition simply makes the play more easily accessible and understood on the various levels of language and scholarship. I recommend this series wholeheartedly.
Diana F. Von Behren
"reneofc"

Used price: $0.13
Collectible price: $25.95

Very unusual "historical-esque" taleReview Date: 2008-03-27
That said, what an unusual piece of historical fiction this is. It will certainly engage and intrigue you, what with the out-of-the-ordinary protagonist (a peurile, irritating, yet emotionally vulnerable court prankster inexorably bonded to a young Welsh king), bizarre love triangle (yes, the "types" involved are older than Le Morte D'Arthur, but the entanglements play out in a most unusual fashion), and tense cat-and-mouse "will the king find out?" head game.
I cannot promise you will "like" all or even ANY of the characters. In fact, most, even the young Queen at times, are not sympathetic. The king especially is guilty of behavior that may have been expected of him in the Middle Ages, but which modern readers may interpret as officious, smug, and emotionally abusive.
And I can assure you that the ending will get a reaction out of you--most likely a negative, throw-your-book-at-the-wall type, but certainly something other than indifference. This is indeed the book's most glaring flaw/contrivance.
Do note, as well, that this is history-"lite." There is little in the way of dense expository historical detailing and description (which, depending on your tolerance for it, may be a boon). There is also little inter-weaving of medieval Welsh custom or culture; the setting is, rather, Generic Middle Ages out of central casting. Finally, very little of the real Welsh political framework is provided, and what IS presented is in a fictionalized form.
But is it worth reading? Yes, I believe so. LArgely through very unusual characterization, Galland has managed to distinguish her all-purpose medieval setting and stock courtly players. You will be left with the distinct impression that you have NOT, in fact, "seen this before."
And that is a pretty impressive achievement, especially for a first-time-novelist.
Historical fictionReview Date: 2008-03-27
More cannot be written without giving away too much. I keep all my favorite books next to my bed- this one is
closest to where I can reach it!
Flawed but compelling characters bring this quasi-historical novel to life...Review Date: 2008-04-23
I wasn't very familiar with the King Maelgwyn ap Cadwallon and his history and feud with the Mortimers, so I don't know just how much of this story is fiction, reality and just how accurate the historical aspects are. Based on the reviews, I'd say this is a novel with a medieval setting and not one based on actual history (except for the accuracy in wardrobe and customs). Nicole Gallant does have a great way with descriptions, narrative and dialogue, and I could imagine the characters, time setting and situations in a vivid way. I don't read much medieval, historical or otherwise; especially the ones before, after and during the Normandy and William the Conqueror's reign (a little too barbaric for me), but I should, for this is a fascinating time period. For the first two hundred or so pages, you read about the relationship between Isabel, Noble and Gwirion and how it develops. You also get a lot of description (too much of it, in my opinion) about Noble's infidelity and Isabel's reaction to it, and also how Gwirion uses it to ridicule and humiliate her. There are scenes centered on the pranks Gwirion commits, which I love, because he really is a rascal and those scenes are hilarious. (I admit, however, that he got on my nerves after a while.) The meat begins about halfway through the book. The scenes that have to do with the battles and the relationship changes between Noble, Gwirion and Isabel are very well written and riveting. The developments between Isabel and Gwirion are subtle and slow -- a little too slow, if I may be honest -- and so you find it believable by the time it happens. This may sound cliche, but it does have a resonance to the whole King Arthur, Guinevere and Lancelot love triangle. The aforementioned tale is mentioned in the novel, Isabel thinking it "romantic." The last chapters are very moving, and I almost cried toward the end. I came to care for these characters -- in spite of their flawed, annoying and even downright unlikable ways -- and the ending floored me. The Fool's Tale is a humorous, intriguing, insightful and memorable piece of medieval-set fiction and I couldn't put it down. I take away a star because, as said earlier, I don't know just how accurate this novel is (even with the author's afterword) and that it should've been at least two-hundred pages shorter. But when it comes to reading enjoyment, it gets five stars. This book has inspired me to pick up more medieval-set novels in the future. I think I'll give Elizabeth Chadwick a whirl. I read one of her novels some time ago and her medieval tales seem accurate and beautiful.
Boring and BanalReview Date: 2008-01-22
good- very depressingReview Date: 2008-01-19

Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $27.50

A little muddled and superficialReview Date: 2002-05-01
Another problem with this work: although the discovery of KV5 is the most important discovery in the Valley of the Kings since the discovery of King Tut's tomb, the actual material found in the tomb is probably not particularly exciting for readers who are not dedicated Egyptologists. Most of the discoveries consist of minute brick and porcelain fragments which poor Mrs. Weeks is charged with cataloguing. For the layman Egyptologist I would recommend instead the classic by Howard Carter, The Discovery of the Tomb of Tutankhamen, also available from Amazon.com This is a truly exciting account of the discovery of Tut's tomb which was packed with fantastic treasures.
greatReview Date: 2001-06-14
Intresting Insight into the excavation processReview Date: 2005-06-11
And a note:
There have been a couple of reviews that have been quite negative, and I think without basis. Given, it is bad that one of the mummies in a picture is mis-marked, but that could be the editors fault. And the review came from a 'student' of Egyptology, who also happens to be in high school, and his/her claims presurpose that they know much more than Weeks.
I am in college and actually major in Egyptology. I know that indescrepancies occur, and this is because of different theories and interpretations that come from the translations of heiroglyphics.
Read the book and judge for yourself how good this book is!
Weeks' excavation did more damage than goodReview Date: 2003-04-07
However, if you are familiar with John Romer's studies on the Valley of the Kings' geology, you would know that the limestone walls would have expanded with moisture and contracted when dried. Weeks' ignorance of this simple fact (he did know of Romer's report but called his study 'unmodern') allowed the tomb roof and walls to contract at an uncontrolled speed. The result was the walls cracked, lost paint and ultiamately the roof fell in an area.
The damage Weeks' excavation did was totally atrocious and it even continues to this day. Support conservation in the Valley of the Kings instead of destructive excavation and ecourage excavations in the Delta (where Egyptologies knowledge is lacking). In conclusion, don't buy this book.
One of the worst popular-science books I've ever readReview Date: 2001-07-05

Habors and High Seas, 3rd EditionReview Date: 2008-05-28
Nice but low priorityReview Date: 2008-04-14
The book is interesting and useful. True that it might have contained more maps but overall it's good value for its cost
Don't wasteyour moneyReview Date: 2008-03-09
O'Brian CompanionReview Date: 2007-10-05
harbors and high seasReview Date: 2007-09-14

Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $21.95

my first Christina Dodd, definately not my last.....Review Date: 2008-01-09
I am surprised that I enjoyed this romance as I don't normally enjoy "royalty" romances, as the heroines tend to be "too stupid too live"-but this series is different as the 3 Princesses must fend for themselves-and the years in exile have made them savvy and street smart.
The bedroom scenes are VERY well written and highly sensual. Don't read a Dodd if explicit scenes offend you as they are pretty predominant here.
Interesting story and characters, romance, adventure and hot, hot, hot. What more could you want in a romance.
4 stars.
Happy broodersReview Date: 2006-09-19
Good ReadReview Date: 2006-03-21
Pure Joy !Review Date: 2006-02-10
The title should have been The Lost Princess - Enchanting Evening Was Off...Review Date: 2006-01-13
This is the second novel by Christina Dodd that I have read in the past year. I also read, "My Fair Enchantress". I gave that book four plus stars - it was an excellent read and I really enjoyed the story line and characters. In this next book, "Some Enchanted Evening", I found the characters interesting as well as the story line but, I would not rate it as great of a read as the first book I had chosen.
Although I liked the story line of this book quite a bit - three princesses (Sorcha, Clarice & Amy) are taken from their respective countries and are sent off in hiding as killers are after them and their ruling families...a fellow prince (Rainger) of a neighboring country is also taken away and once released from his captivity makes an agreement with the princesses grandmother to get them back. If the prince finds the three girls, he can chose one to marry. So...it's off to the races. This story focused on the middle princess - Clarice. She also had an older sister Sorcha and a little sister Amy. Sorcha was gone elsewhere whereas Clarice and Amy were able to stay together.
Clarice and Amy managed to outwit the bad guys by traveling town to town, peddling their family cosmetic secrets to local gals for their money and lodging. They would move on to new places to keep up the game and stay out of reach of the bad guys. They managed to do this for many years. Their grandmother was due to put notices in local papers when they could return to their own country safely - that had not happened yet.
So...they find their way to a local town where a high ranking earl - Hepburn - Robert Mackenzie is running the show and the locals pay honor to him as an old war hero. They peddle their goods in his town and charm both men and women alike with their winsome ways. They state clearly they are princesses on the run and have stopped to give women happiness via their face and body creams. Everyone buys into the show. The girls stay on in town and thus...an attraction and relationship develop between Robert and Clarice as she stays at his castle to help with a large ball that is being thrown in honor of another great war hero- Ogley.
Robert finds out Clarice stole her horse and is on the run from that too. He uses this information to bribe her to help him outwit the nasty war hero Ogley. She is to use her cosmetics and winsome ways to pretend to be an ex-mistress of Ogley so, that Robert and his friend Waldemar can corner the ex-war hero and get him to provide proper discharge and honorary release in the military to Waldemar that was taken away by by Ogley. Thus...a charade begins to help Robert fulfill this need help his friend. In turn, Clarice is trying to stay outside the bad guys trying to find her and Amy and the local magistrate who knows she stole his horse.
I won't give the ending away suffice to say, the story course works itself out in the end (a wee bit too perfectly if you ask me) and everyone is happy, happy, happy. The story also alludes at the end that a new book will follow regarding Princess Amy and where her future travels will take her as she does not want to be a princess any longer. Not surprising there.
I did find some inconsistencies in the story that prevented me from liking the story better. For instance...you would think lots of time elapsed between Clarice first coming to town, meeting the villagers, staying with Robert and his sister Millicent at the castle, the ball occurring and help being done for Waldemar and she outwitting the magistrate who arrests her. But...in reality, only a handful of days go by for all this to occur. During this time, Clarice and Robert manage to be highly attracted to one another, have many sexual outings and manage to fall head over heals in love and want to marry. This time frame didn't work for me at all - not realistic. A lifetime of events occur in about a two week time span (if not less) and I couldn't get into the emotions of these characters and find it real with so little time devoted to developing their relationship.
Also...Clarice is supposedly on the run from not only bad guys trying to kill her and Amy for the crown but, also after her for horse theft. So...what would a girl do to stay hidden in obscurity...well for starters, ride into town after town, manage to make everyone notice her due to her beauty and outspokenness and proclaim loudly each time that she is a princess adrift from her country but, she is there to help everyone nonetheless. I would say that's keeping a low profile, don't you? I kept thinking if any of the bad guys or magistrate had half a brain and network of spies, she could have been found and nabbed very easily. Plus...she is supposedly a top beauty on a rare and priceless horse yet...no word of this goes from town to town after she leaves? And is it safe to be out riding alone like that - wouldn't someone try to rob or steal from her or worse? No...not our heroine. Apparently, she has a special protective safety bubble the rest of us don't have. These things didn't work for me.
Also...Robert was in this emotionless bubble since coming back from war yet, in a matter of days he is suddenly a new man because of Clarice and their sexual and emotional encounters? Or that Clarice wants to return to her kindom and have a top marriage to continue the line yet..she will have sex with Robert at a moment's notice and not worry anymore about her thrown? Or that Millicent was this dull, dry and aged spinster with no back bone to show for herself and in a matter of days suddenly transforms into this lovely beauty with wit, spunk and courage? Once again...too many inconsistencies for me.
Even though Clarice was a princess and Robert's sister Millicent running an Earl's estate...I didn't care for the way they treated their servants. For some reason, it was not appealing that the two main female leads would snap their fingers for something to happen, talk down to their staff and act as if they were less than average people. Yet...both Clarice and Millicent would be kind and warm to nearly everyone else. I felt they were demeaning to those in their work staff and that was not appealing to me. This was a small thing but, I noticed it anyway. You can be firm and have directive without being snotty and snooty.
Last...I am not sure why this book is titled, "Some Enchanted Evening" (just because she's a princess in exile doesn't support "enchanting"). I do not remember any special night outing that would support such a title. I think they could have come up with a better title to support the story line. I say this because I like to have title's support the book as well as the cover designs and photos. For me, it helps for some reason.
Rainger, the forgotten prince, actually seemed like an interesting character but, we only got to see snippets of him as a child at court and then once or twice as an adult as he searched for and found Clarice at the end. I think a story with him might be interesting and expect it will follow one day if it has not yet. My guess is that Amy will end up with her own knight in shining amour such as Clarice found and that oldest Princess Sorcha will end up with Prince Rainger as her own? Just my guess but, I would like to see that happen. We'll see.
There were times during the reading of this book that I started to feel myself drift off and get bored - that's never a good sign in a love story. I gave three stars more for the author herself than the book. I like how she writes and feel she is very talented. This story just didn't seem well developed for me. Even though I would not consider this one of the best or better books I have read, it still had enough going on to be over-all pleasing. I would consider more of her books and hope you do too. Enjoy!

Used price: $0.46
Collectible price: $29.99

not much different from previous editionsReview Date: 2008-02-24
Saved MoneyReview Date: 2007-01-18
Book deliveryReview Date: 2007-01-09
A visit to ChinaReview Date: 2007-09-23
GreatReview Date: 2006-12-21
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
The novel is the third part of William Kennedy's Albany cycle. (The earlier books are Legs and Billy Phalen's Greatest Game.) Ironweed traces the return of a man to his hometown in 1937 after a twenty-year absence. Francis Phalen deserted his family after the accidental death of his infant son. He has spent two decades on the bum.
William Kennedy's gifts as a writer are apparent in the crafting of dialogue. (Kennedy also wrote the screenplay for the film, which offers crisp and arresting lines for Jack Nicholson and Meryl Streep.) The compressed conversation of Kennedy's ruined characters allow an unexpected impact from a phrase of no more than two or three words. Francis and his pal Rudy are together after Francis's visit to his son's grave (p. 20):
"Whatayou been up to?" Rudy asked. "You know somebody buried up there?"
"A little kid I used to know."
"A kid? What'd he do, die young?"
"Pretty young."
"What happened to him?"
"He fell."
"He fell where?"
"He fell on the floor."
"Hell I fall on the floor about twice a day and I ain't dead."
"That's what you think," Francis said.
Kennedy is attempting to trace the emotional struggles that unfold on the battleground of Francis Phalen's interior world. Francis encounters ghosts from his past - his dead son, men he has killed, his parents buried in the family plot - as well as his wife. These encounters focus on Francis's attempt to understand the impulses that caused him to flee Albany and now to return.
Kennedy allows the dead son, Gerald, to articulate (p. 19) to the reader what is at stake for Francis. Gerald, through an act of silent will, imposed on his father the pressing obligation to perform his final acts of expiation for abandoning the family.
"You will not know, the child silently said, what these acts are until you have performed them all. And after you have performed them you will not understand that they are expiatory any more than you have understood all the other expiation that has kept you in such prolonged humiliation. Then, when these final acts are complete, you will stop trying to die because of me."
Kennedy is concerned that the reader gets the point early and read on for other reasons. What might these be? The awareness of guilt; the manner in which unknowing expiation occurs; the security that comes from well-deserved punishment, which is self-inflicted and certain.
Does expiation compel humiliation? Can expiation occur without understanding? Do the dead - whether family or martyred saints of God - whether family or martyred saints of God - rule the living? Are the dead entitled to exercise this power?
This review has been published in a collection of reviews and articles, That's What I'm Talking About (Nativa 2008).THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT