Movies Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250

Used price: $5.84

Great learning toolReview Date: 2007-08-24
Sweet screenplay!!!Review Date: 2007-07-07
"The woods are lovely dark and deep..."Review Date: 2007-04-18
A great screenplay to a great film.Review Date: 2007-05-29

Used price: $1.20

EXCELLENT HISTORY Review Date: 2008-02-28
As a card carrying member of the ACLU I sometimes cannot praise the ACLU enough, while other times, I cannot wrap my mind around why they take some positions that seen in diametrical opposition to what I want them to. This book gives a great explanation of how and why the ACLU has been viewed as a savior and a villian, and why we are all better off for their existence.
A good stand alone review of the ACLUReview Date: 1998-12-14
A Great Book!Review Date: 1998-11-18
InformativeReview Date: 1999-05-14

enlightmentReview Date: 2003-09-30
very perceptive historical insight into today's drug problemReview Date: 1999-06-30
Must read for law enforcement!Review Date: 1999-01-03
Well-documented examination of the DEA in Mexico.Review Date: 1998-10-06

Used price: $3.95

Indispensible Review Date: 2008-09-06
I was surprised by many of foods I thought were healthy. If you're wondering why the weight won't go away, check this book out. It will give you the lowdown on just about everything you eat.
good bookReview Date: 2008-06-11
This review is for the Kindle ed. Review Date: 2008-04-13
One of the most pratical Kindle purchases I've made.
Excellent bookReview Date: 2008-06-07

Used price: $0.01

Digimon RulesReview Date: 2000-10-22
Digimon RulesReview Date: 2000-10-22
Di Di Di!Review Date: 2000-11-27
Digimon RulesReview Date: 2000-10-22

Used price: $0.76
Collectible price: $19.99

A Great Response to the DaVinci CodeReview Date: 2007-02-06
Exposing the LiesReview Date: 2006-04-18
Exploring the Da Vinci Code with the dvd is absolutely great for exposing the lies of the book by Dan Brown.
Lee even includes the FAQ and Evidence for the identity of Jesus based on discussions with real historians in this area of history.
I recommend everyone get this and use it to share the truth with followers of Dan Brown of those duped by him.
The Case Against the Da Vinci CodeReview Date: 2006-05-07
This curriculum was put together with "seekers" in mind. "Since the primary audience for this guide is the not-yet-convinced seekers, the ideal place to use Discussing the Da Vinci Code is within the context of seeker groups." (10) The emphasis is group discussion such that if the proposed schedule is followed participants will spend about 17 minutes watching the DVD and 43 minutes conversing per session.
The DVD and discussion guide are broken down into four sessions in which Lee Strobel visits some of the historical locations utilized in The Da Vinci Code and interviews contemporary scholars. In the first session, the topic of historical analysis is discussed with historian Paul Maier. The second session poses the question "Can we trust the four Gospels?" to New Testament scholar Scot McKnight. Strobel interviews Kathy McReynolds in session three about the role of women in Christianity and Jesus' relationship with Mary Magdalene. The final session deals with the divinity of Jesus with scholar Mark Strauss.
Considering the proposed "seeker context," the discussion guide is very well done. It provides great questions for discussion while provided many quotes from scholars, Dan Brown, and facts throughout the booklet. In the back of the guide are several appendices that recommend further resources, state the facts, and give arguments for the true identity of Jesus that is affirmed by historic Christianity.
While it's neat to see Lee Strobel "on location," he doesn't really engage the sites he visits, so that seemed somewhat pointless. Strobel is more known for his investigative journalist approach, which he applied well on the DVD. He asks good questions that provoke good responses form the reputable scholars.
The DVD also has some promotional trailers, which could be shown to get people interested in joining the discussion group. The graphics and navigation of the DVD are extremely well done. The DVD together with the group discussion guide make Discussing the Da Vinci Code a thought provoking curriculum that will be useful for seekers and curious Christians alike.
Really great information. Great Discussion materialReview Date: 2006-05-27

Used price: $0.06
Collectible price: $19.95

A great book to accompany the movie.Review Date: 2007-06-05
A visual feast for dinosaur loversReview Date: 2001-01-29
The book is a visual treat. Disney used cutting-edge techniques to bring the creatures of "Dinosaur" to life, and the book captures each animal splendidly. The soft fur of the lemurs, the bony neck frill of the styracosaur, the fierce teeth of the carnotaur--all the details are vivid and memorable.
The book's effectiveness is, however, compromised by the fact that the authors seem unsure of their purpose. Is this book supposed to be a guide to the fictional world of the movie, or to the real world of dinosaurs as science understands them? For example, the book is filled with scientific-sounding observations like "Herd dinosaurs are highly social animals, and during the nesting season the lake is the center of their bustling community." Sidebars with titles like "Cretaceous Life" add to this pseudoscientific flavor. But as far as I know, there is no evidence that dinosaurs spoke English or formed multispecies families with lemurs, as depicted in this film! This flaw aside, this book is a treat for kids who loved the movie, or who love dinosaurs in general.
The best of the Disney's Dinosaur booksReview Date: 2000-06-04
Essential Guide: A welcomened understatementReview Date: 2000-04-19


Very happy with this setReview Date: 2006-01-20
Wonderful readReview Date: 2005-12-20
A Disney ClassicReview Date: 2004-06-12
The cover featuring characters from each story allows the child to decide which story they want before the book is even opened. Once inside each story takes around 64 pages and is fully illustrated in striking full colour and to the standard expected from Disney. Bizarrely, Toy Story 2 is illustrated while the original Toy Story is accompanied by stills from the film. The text is large and simple without sacrificing the general plot of the film and each story is divided into three chapters to create 'bite-sized' reading sessions.
I was very impressed with the introduction for parents that covers beautifully how these books (and books in general) can be best used as a tool for learning. Not preachy, just helpful!
Right Cover, Wrong Book Description by Amazon!Review Date: 2004-01-21
That said, both this version (this is Volume 2 being sold, according to the ISBN#) and Volume 1 are great books for your Disney-lovin' kids. The stories are told concisely (but don't sacrifice plot) and match the movies' storylines, are each about 65 pages long (with a lot of the original dialogue from the movies) and the pics are fabulous: there are several pages with full page pictures of scenes from the movies, and I don't think there is a page in the book without a picture on it. My young children love looking through these books and having them read to them. And the text is a nice, big size to make it easy for those fairly new to reading.
While the stories themselves may be too long for very young children (and they do contain the darker elements that some of the Disney movies have), the pictures are large and brightly colored enough to entertain even the youngest child. The book is a large size (8.5x10) and the hardcover is sturdy; just watch out for those little fingers ripping the pages!
All-in-all a great buy for those wanting to get their young ones into reading and away from the TV. Get Volume 1 if you can, too!

Used price: $0.01

He treats it like non-fiction Review Date: 2008-02-25
Perfect for the young mind.Review Date: 2005-03-20
The early sixties were a time of great political uncertainty and scientific advancement. Lee used both of them to great advantage in developing the idea of the mutant with great powers. By developing the character of Professor X who gathered together many mutants at his school, a crime fighting team known as the X-Men was developed. The group has changed a great deal over the years, both in appearance and in membership. This is a history of that group and young readers can also learn something about the world. For example, it is noted that the bones of the winged X-Man Angel are hollow, just like those of real birds. Other relevant science facts, such as details about water freezing in the section about Ice-Man relate the powers of the X-Men to the physical laws of the universe.
I strongly recommend this as a book for young readers. The topic is one that they will find of great interest, it is very well written at the appropriate level and they can learn something about the world. Perfect for the young mind.
Introduction to the Original Team.Review Date: 2003-05-12
The Story Behind the X-MenReview Date: 2001-01-01

Used price: $8.42
Collectible price: $24.50

The Quintessestial Dr. Who Reference bookReview Date: 2002-02-12
This book deserves an award - thanks Lance. RECOMMENDED!!!
Very InformativeReview Date: 2007-10-21
For those of us who have never read, nor care to read, the multitude of Doctor Who novels in existence, A History of The Universe can act as sort of Cliff Notes that we used in school when assigned to read a long and tedious novel but had no desire to. The plot of each story is briefly outlined on the timeline at the year in which it takes place. Therefore, we can "cheat" by finding out what happens without actually picking up the book. Parkin makes it simple to determine which events come from television, and which come from the novel by using a differentiating typeface as a distinguishing feature. He uses lightface for tv and boldface for the novels. What can be simpler?
THE UNIT ERA:
This is a bugaboo era for Doctor Who pendantics. It's impossible for the UNIT stories to be pinned down to a definite year. From all accounts, these stories were originally meant to take place in the near future. In a 1969 interview with Jon Pertwee, he reveals that the Doctor would be exiled to earth "in the 1980's". (p. 286, A History of The Universe) Yet this very well could be misinformation. No specific date is ever pinpointed within the third Doctor stories themselves, although Jo comes so tantalizingly close in Day of The Daleks as she explains to the Controller what time she is from. Irritatingly, the Controller stops her after "Sept. 12", as she has already told him the year, (off camera, of course!).
In Pyramids of Mars in what appears to be a throw-away line, Sarah claims she is from 1980, which would suggest a near future setting for previous UNIT tales since Pyramids was produced in 1975. However, in Mawdryn Undead, a very specific date of the Brigadier's retirement is given, 1976. Adding to the confusion, the time zones in which Mawdryn takes place is 1977/83, contradicting all previous attempts to date UNIT stories and throwing that proverbial monkey wrench in the lives of many pendantics.
So take your pick. As Parkin suggests, take the facts you like while ignoring any that contradict your argument. There is no perfect way to assign specific years to UNIT stories. Therefore, Mr. Parkin cops out by listing the UNIT entries on his timeline as 1970s earth, but qualifies this by stating that they likely occur anywhere from the late 60s to the early 80s. A cop-out, but perhaps a wise cop out, as he allows each individual reader to accept or deny facts as that reader so chooses. Personally, I would rather ignore a throw-away line like Sarah's, which if removed from the script would remove absolutely nothing from the premise of the story, than to ignore the Mawdryn time zone which forms the whole basis for a story. Also, a near-future setting can be interpreted with a broad brush stroke. "Near future" literally can mean ten, five or even one year down the road. One month, or even one day, can technically be the near future. Plus, it is much more convenient to think of UNIT as a contemporary early 70s setting, with a possible slight near future variance, because virtually the whole era smacks of early 70s, from the fashions, psychedlia ... and the fact that miles, yards and feet are still used as measurements, Britain not yet switched to the metric system.
Like Lance Parkin, I will not force my opinion on others. I can only suggest that you weigh the contradictory facts of this era against one another and form your own opinion. That is precisely what Parkin is attempting to do by not assigning specific years to the UNIT era. To exert his opinion as the correct one would take away from the non-critical aura of this book.
Appendix: I do realize that this book is from 1996 and outdated, and it has been recently updated to include events of the new series. However, at the risk of irking fans of that series, to me true Doctor Who ends with the classic series. My personal taste for Doctor Who suffers its cataclysmic demise at the cataclysmic demise of the Colin Baker era, but I can accept events of the McCoy era as well as the novels as part of the Whoniverse. While the new series may be fun and exciting to some, to me it's just not the same. The Whoniverse begins and ends with this version for me.
Parkin surpasses himself with this work of metafictionReview Date: 1997-01-28
A true labour of love from Lance Parkin!Review Date: 2002-04-21
In addition to incorporating the NAs and MAs, he uses his own conjecture in various places, but those are few. For example, in The Masque Of Mandragora, the Doctor says that it will return to Earth in five hundred years, 1992. He assumes that if it did, it must have been defeated once more. The text for the televised adventures is done in a normal font, the NA and MAs in bold, and his own conjecture in a slightly thicker bold-italic. The footnotes after each event or story is explained in detail on the sides of each page. It's easy for stories that explicitly state the date e.g. Silver Nemesis takes place on 23 November 1988, but what about stories like Delta And The Bannermen, which takes place in ?4287 AD? Parkin gives arbitrary dates, but the interesting thing is, the last two digits are equal to the digits the show came out, 1987. The Caves Of Androzani, which came out in 1984, is given a date of ?2884.
There are seven sections in the book: Prehistory, Known History, Contemporary, the Near Future, which we're in right now, Colonisation, the Earth Empire, and the Far Future. Although a history of the universe, there is clearly an Earth-bias especially in the Earth Empire section. Yes, the Earth follows the model of the British Empire, from rise to collapse, as was mentioned in the TV story The Mutants.
There are explanations of the Great Old Ones, the powerful beings such as Fenric, the Animus, and the Great Intelligence, in the Prehistory section, as well as known astronomical theory such as the Big Bang and Galaxy formation hypothesis, and the variability of races that sprang up.
My favorite part is probably the period we're in right now in the book, with technological gluts, environmental disasters, shifts in the ozone layer, severe overpopulation, goth-apocalypse culture, and civil wars. All this takes place 2001-2009, and I sometimes wonder that given the corporate mindset of industrial countries, if this science-fiction will become reality.
One
peeve I have is the dating of the Patrick Troughton/Jon Pertwee era UNIT stories, a sore point between Who fans. I belong
to the faction that puts them the year or the year after the story came out on TV. Others put them in the future. Parkin
merely dates those stories (1970's UNIT-- This last New Adventure covered here is
Happy Endings, where Bernice gets married to Jason, and the last Missing Adventure is Sands Of Time, the sequel to Pyramids
Of Mars. It's important to note that around the time this book came out, Virgin Publishing's rights were set to expire in
May. A handful more of New and Missing Adventures came out, too late to be incorporated into Parkin's book. That also meant
there could never be a second edition of the Universe book, also published by Virgin. What I wonder is, now that BBC books
has the rights to new Who stories, will they come out with their own Who universe guide, thereby invalidating Lance Parkin's
painstakingly crafted work? It would be a shame if it did. Why not incorporate the New/Missing and the current new adventures
in a future book? For now, this will do just nicely.
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
Do not be swayed by the Tarantino haters out there. If you want to learn style he is one of the best today. There are many that throw around the terms "boycott", "overrated", etc. I am still fascinated by the number of people that go out of their way to drag down Tarantino's work yet they still see his movies. You would think by now that they would have learned to just not watch them. In reality these people are just jealous of the success he has had. Tarantino very often is referencing other movies that he watched while growing up. He is usually not doing anything original but is instead giving a film history lesson giving us glimpses of the movies of the past.
Follow your own path. Make your own decisions and do not listen to the haters.