Bebe Neuwirth Books

I have listened to these over and over and get more out of them each time. Neil Gaiman is a brilliant writer and the actors in these audio plays are incredible. This is art of the highest order.

I'm a fan...Neil's worst works still qualify as excellent in my mind, and these are some of his best. I read these stories when they were published 10 years ago in a small distribution book called Angels and Visitations. Then I saw them reprinted again in another book some years later.

The two plays in this package provided my wife and I the best entertainment we were going to get while being stuck in 8 hours of traffic. Finally I got my wife to pay attention to Neil's stuff (she refused to read Sandman)and she dug it.

If you like books on tape, this is better. If you like reading Neil's work, you'll like it even better this way.

Neil, if you're reading this...can we have some more of these?

Two very disturbing stories from Neil Gaiman, this was a duet of short plays adapted for "Seeing Ear Theatre" and read by Bebe Neuwirth ("Snow Glass Apples") and Brian Dennehy ("Murder Mystery.")

"Snow Glass Apples" was a re-telling of Snow White with a ghastly vampiric twist, and from the voice of the Queen, who is anything but the Disnified villainess we've come to know and loathe. Snow White is herself a disturbing figure, and all in all, this was a very enjoyable re-telling of a classic, if a tad gruesome in its telling and conclusion.

"Murder Mystery" I found quite wonderful - it is a tale that includes the investigation of the first murder ever - an angel has been killed, and another angel is called to investigate. The B-plot story, however, just plain didn't make sense.

If I had to break them into two parts, "Snow Glass Apples" would get a '5' and "Murder Mystery" would get a '3.' Hence the '4.'

'Nathan

Two Plays For Voices is part of the Seeing Ear Theatre Productions from the Sci-Fi Channel. More television stations should follow their lead. These two stories told in the form of radio plays are terrific! I am a big fan of Neil Gaiman and this format brings two incredible stories to life.

Murder Mysteries is expertly presented and the twist at the end is a surprise to say the least.

Snow Glass Apples is a shivery fairy tale which cuts to the core of good vs. evil and that some things aren't always what they seem.

I'm a fan...Neil's worst works still qualify as excellent in my mind, and these are some of his best. I read these stories when they were published 10 years ago in a small distribution book called Angels and Visitations. Then I saw them reprinted again in another book some years later.

The two plays in this package provided my wife and I the best entertainment we were going to get while being stuck in 8 hours of traffic. Finally I got my wife to pay attention to Neil's stuff (she refused to read Sandman)and she dug it.

If you like books on tape, this is better. If you like reading Neil's work, you'll like it even better this way.

Neil, if you're reading this...can we have some more of these?

This book contains most anything you'd like to know about this TV show but I was very dissapointed that, with such a high price, there are hardly any photos (all are in B&W), the book is rather small and it doesn't even have a cover jacket. Anyway, the contents are as good as can be expected and the subject makes it a must buy (of sorts !) for fans of the show.

Simply awesome. That best describes this literary tome. If you buy books for solid content, this is the greatest book available on the television show "Cheers". If you buy books for pictures, buy this book and read it while watching "Cheers". From cover-to-cover, you will be amazed at how craftily this book is written and how comprehensively it is researched. If you love "Cheers" you will love this book.

I am a fan of many sitcoms, and take a keen interest in any books on the subject. "Cheers" is one of my all-time favorities. "Toasting Cheers" is the most well-written, comprehensive, and thorough book ever to grace the shelves of any library. Every section is inordinately detailed to give the reader a strong sense of knowledge about the show, the characters, and the actors. The author definitely knows the subject matter better than anyone else. The book is a must-buy for anyone who loves the show.

Mr. Bjorklund's book celebrating CHEERS is the most comprehensive of its kind. Rich in history and very well written, its a must buy for any Cheers fan.

The author does an exceptional job of presenting the useful cheers information, without falling into sensationalism. I bought six copies to give to friends for christmas.

This book is almost scientific in its construction. Not only does it provide accurate information about the lives and the careers of the series creators and actors (without turning to gossip), but also chronological stories of the fictional characters they portrayed on television, showing the narrative richness of Cheers. The episode guide comes in handy if you plan to impress your drinking buddy with quite useless but entertaining Cliffy style Cheers trivia, especially the notable quotes are of use. If you're a true Cheers fan, this book is a must.

This book annoyed me like no book has ever done before. I liked it at first, because it has lots of fabulous insights, description, and dialog. Here are some examples:

"Mrs. Pace was a mighty person. She said what people were. And if she said someone was a fool, that didn't necessarily mean she held it against them. It depended on what kind of fool."

"I have the impression that French people will tell an American things that they wouldn't tell each other. Among themselves, a certain set of conventions obtains, a certain competitive mistrust, real-life reticences from which we are exempted by our cheerful barbarousness."

"'The French love things more for their beauty or their totemic significance than for their value,' Roxy agreed.
'Whereas Americans affect disdain for material objects, as if it weren't quite nice to collect, or have,' Ames Everett said. 'Yet they are great consumers. The French are materialists without being consumers. I respect that.'"

"There is nothing your mind can do with a fact as immutable and unacceptable as death, anyway."

Each chapter also begins with a quotation that is somehow related to the action in that chapter. I wrote so many marginal notes -- Diane Johnson raises questions about everything. I like books that raise questions. And I prefer books that leave existential questions unanswered. Plot questions are another matter.

I'd warn you that this review contains spoilers, but I can't do that. That is just the issue that frustrated me to the point of writing this review. I had to warn you: There is no possible way to give away the ending, because there isn't one. We have a dead guy, a young widow with a newborn baby, an affair that may or may not be ending, an important painting that got sold to who knows whom, and more. One day I turned the page wondering how all these interesting subplots might be resolved or intertwined, or at least wound down to some sort of equilibrium, but instead of finding a concluding chapter, there was a note about how the book was typeset. (This gesture is usually of interest to me, as a designer, but this time it just pissed me off.) Did I get a defective copy, missing its final chapter?

So I logged onto Amazon thinking there must be a sequel and I'd better find it fast. There isn't one. That's it. Not a single one of the storylines was tied off.

Normally I like books that mirror life, and offer insight into it, but this is ridiculous! Even the chapters of my life end more conclusively than this book. I don't necessarily need a happy ending (though it might be nice, what with the lighthearted attitude of this book), but at least something! Anything!

I've decided to keep Le Divorce in my library for two reasons:
1) It does contain wonderfully accurate quotations and all my eager underlining (in pencil) and notes on the purpose of life and cross-cultural relationships (I have French relatives and a Swiss husband).
2) I can't sell it on Amazon Marketplace for more than a nickel.

So read it if you want to be entertained and think a lot, and learn about the French, and then be angry and feel like you are hanging over the edge of a cliff holding on by your fingernails... indefinitely. You don't even get to fall to your death and be done with it. Grrr.

While the idea of running off to Paris appealed to me, the story had its moments where the characters turned me off. I never really bought into Isabelle's relationship with a man so much older than her. There never seemed to be a genuine attraction, and I almost disliked her for her self-absorption. Her sister was also self-centered, and not exactly an empathetic character. The best thing about this book is the backdrop of Paris. Johnson did a wonderful job of making me feel like I was there, I just wished I'd enjoyed the characters that brought me there a little more. On the whole, I didn't dislike the book, I just expected more.

This beautiful book is so much better than the movie. The ending is completely different. Like Diane Johnson's other novels, she expects her reader to be educated in literature, not just Voltaire and other French writers, but American ones, too, and even ancient Greek philosophers. If you haven't read Henry James's "The Portrait of a Lady," at least watch the movie version. Also like her other books, Johnson writes about the differences between American and French laws (obviously those concerning divorce). Her portrayal of two step-sisters is poignant. In fact, their relationship is the focus of the novel. While Isabel's idealistic sister, Roxy, gives in to weeping and feeling sorry for herself, it's really Isabel who needs to weep over her destroyed childhood. Like many children of divorce, Isabel has learned to be emotionally distant (almost like an existential film) and to be the strong American girl who can take care of herself. Isabel's falling for an older man is related to her mother's failed marriage. It's explicitly stated that Isabel takes after her mother. If her mother failed at finding love and Isabel is just like her, just think what that would do to a young woman's psyche. It's no wonder that Isabel tries to find an alternative to marriage. One reads the book to see if Isabel will suceed. I love how Johnson wrote the novel from the point of view of Isabel. It's the voice of an ingenue that captures all the levity and sadness of a young woman blossoming into an adult. I also liked the ending. The big plot question is: Will Paris defeat the sisters and send them home, or will they somehow learn to stand on their own feet and defend their ground.

A short review because I basically agree with the other reviewers' opinions. My trouble is that I actually really like Diane Johnson's writing: I like her use of language and I like her funny observations that are so very human and familiar. What I cannot stand, and in this book particularly, is that the plot is so dull, the plot points seem almost arbitrarily thrown in, and that the climax and resolution to the story are so tepid as to be almost non-existent.

I have tried two of her books and I will not be trying a third.

I rarely read fiction and only read this book because it took place in Paris and because I found it at a yard sale, with Le Marriage, for 25 cents. That's what it was worth and it confirmed to me that much of what fiction writers write is boring. My benchmark for a great fiction read taking place in France is "A Very Long Engagement."

Neither of the books was witty. Have you ever read what Madame de Seveigne said to the king? That's true French wit. I was looking for that. Don't say that a book is witty unless you know what true wit is. Ms. Johnson never comes close to true wit.

Don't insult me by expecting me to figure out how Roxy is surviving after her husband, the painter, leaves. Never a word about her financial state. And the smart Iz, picks up with Edgar - a 70 year old stud??? Please! From the Viagara sales, I would assume there are not very many of them around. And all that Bosnia stuff was unneeded. I skipped over most of it.

I found the intimate scenes in this book TMI (too much information). Our imaginations are alive and well. And the "f" word still turns me off! It doesn't make a book better for people of a certain age (who, by the way, buy a lot of books).

The American/French infighting and comparisons may be helpful to some, but I'd rather read something like "Sixty Million Frenchmen Can't be Wrong" and get a clearer picture. French people might say early in a conversation that Americans smile too much (I experienced that in Paris), but if you respond quickly with a slightly acerbic response, you'll be loved. She should have known that. Iz could have developed those skills and had Edgar adoring her instead of using her.

Where were the little Parisian pictures I was looking for? Iz walked all over Paris but very few of those little scenes one comes upon were recorded for us to love again: the fragrance and colors ablaze at the flower shops, the crepe stand outside the cafe on rue Cler. Did she ever pop into an Alimentation for Medjool dates or strawberries or melons? How about a baguette or a stop at the pastry shop? Hello! We are in Paris! Did she buy perfume at one of those little shops on rue de Grennelle or chocolates? Does Ms. Johnson actually "see" Paris except for the inside of restaurants or cafes? Her characters seem to just whiz by everything truly Parisian in their haste to meet up with another dull person.

The chance meetings were so forced. Claude-Henri's lover's husband meets Iz by chance at Disneyland of Paris (or whatever it is called). Now that's just too pat!

In her defense, the author did develop the painting and it's relationship to so many of the characters well. In fact, following that part of the story is what kept me reading.

Yes, the translation of the foreign language phrases would be helpful for those who do not read or understand the language or have a French/English dictionary at hand. I don't think that will change in succeeding books, however. It would be too gauche for Ms. Johnson.

Ms. Johnson has some language gifts, but I often stumbled over an unfamiliar word seeminly inserted just to impress me that she knew such a word. (I could see her thumbing through a dictionary trying to find those words.) A better simpler word, according to Jeffrey McQuain in "Power Language" would really work as well and keep the reading smoother.

I won't read any more of this author's works. Cara Black (Murder in ........series) did not bring me back after a first read, either. Maybe some modern author will really write a great "in Paris" novel one day. I am looking anxiously for it.