Michael Nader Books

There is no better argument for the reexamination of "architectural language" than this excellent book by Michael Cadwell. Writing in a tradition stemming from Kenneth Frampton's "Studies in Tectonic Culture," this volume examines four buildings by canonic figures--Carlo Scarpa, Frank Lloyd Wright, Mies van der Rohe, and Louis Kahn.

Cadwell writes that, in 1999, after being granted a fellowship at the American Academy in Rome, he hoped to study the work of Carlo Scarpa, in particular the Querini Stampalia Foundation in Venice, discussed at length in the first chapter. After studying and drawing Scarpa's meticulous details at length, Cadwell discovered that "The drawings refused to cooperate. No matter how I arranged the details on the walls, they resisted an order." From this resistance emerged this book, which does not discuss the clear, perfectly articulated theories of architecture (e.g. Le Corbusier and his contemporary rationalist disciples), but rather the materials of architecture that resist explanation, a thickness of material that expands beyond its physical depth.

Cadwell performs this operation again and again, tying each architect's conceptual project to the physical, material nature of their buildings. Scarpa's details flow and dissolve like the water that runs through them, Wright's Jacobs house moves in and out of his idyllic, suburban vision of the broadacre city, and Mies's Farnsworth house is revealed not as a heroic mastery of nature, but as the epitome of humility, reinserting and immersing its occupant in the surrounding environment. Cadwell has the ability to make all of these apparent at a larger level, but always zooms in and out -- the details of architecture truly become the analogue for the world around it.

Finally, Cadwell's book suggests an alternate path for contemporary practice (though it never does so explicitly, a tactic that I believe carries more weight than even a manifesto). The architects discussed here are concerned with the architectural object, the physical entity of architecture. Today's image-driven architectural culture is more invested in the rendering than the building itself, the concept over the detail, architecture as graphic design--flat, flashy, and fatuous. Cadwell's analyses point toward a reevaluation of the material nature of buildings, a position that will undoubtedly be disregarded by some as hopelessly atavistic, but a position that asserts architecture in its barest, most exposed state, as the physical negotiation of the myriad worldly forces surrounding it.