Hugh Laurie Books
Related Subjects: Movies
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

One great bookReview Date: 2008-03-26
882.5 answers to questions about titanicReview Date: 2007-07-29
Very InterestingReview Date: 2007-07-20
For Titanic aficionados, this is a great reference book.
882 1/2 Percent AWSOME!!!!!!Review Date: 2007-05-24
882 1/2 Amazing Answers To Your Questions About The TitanicReview Date: 2007-04-01


Love this book!Review Date: 2007-11-24
Rumble in the Jungle! Rocks!!Review Date: 2007-02-21
Fun for parents and kidsReview Date: 2007-01-29
Only draw-back is that it is permanately stuck in my head. Can't go to the zoo without finding myself saying the rhymes. Oh, who am I kidding, that's not a draw-back...it is kinda fun! hee hee
A must for any homeReview Date: 2007-01-09
Take a lookReview Date: 2007-05-29
Used price: $3.51

Excellent!Review Date: 2002-11-04
Gem of a book for a gem of a museumReview Date: 2001-07-01
Another Venturi ClassicReview Date: 2000-06-19


Early short stories still show great talent.Review Date: 2001-08-03
A solid collection of Alcott's storiesReview Date: 2003-06-17
The first two stories are from Alcott's "Hospital Sketches"; together with the third story, they deal with protagonists who work as nurses for Civil War soldiers. "My Contraband" has as a key theme the legacy of slavery. "Happy Women" is more of a sketch celebrating single women, and the final piece tells the "serio-comico experience" of a young woman who goes to work as a domestic companion.
I read this book shortly after reading Alcott's novel "The Inheritance," written when she was only 17; that simple but charming work makes for a fascinating contrast with the polished maturity of the pieces in this volume. Overall, this collection shows Alcott's wit, humor, compassion for humanity, attentive eye, and particular concern for women's issues. This short (55 + vii pages) book is a wonderful collection by one of the most remarkable figures in American literature.
A charming array of little storiesReview Date: 2000-07-21

Used price: $15.85

greatReview Date: 2007-05-17


It's not bad, but Orczy is no DumasReview Date: 2008-05-08
Some may think that I have been harsh with this book. That may be so, but if it is it is because I am so shocked that others dare favorably compare this to the masterpieces of Dumas, or to the great Zorro writings of McCulley. Orczy is not a terrible writer, but it is rather outrageous to compare her to the great swashbuckler authors. She is almost entirely missing the raw spirit of adventure present in others, and this spirit is at the very heart of the adventures of those like Dumas. For me there was no point in this book where I was entheusiastically turning the pages, eager to find out what would happen to the main character, following with glee each turn of events. This is not at all because the main character is female. It is because the main character is not the hero, and is not even adventuresome. To be quite frank, she is rather boring until toward the very end of the book, and even then she does not endear herself to the reader in the manner of a D'Artagnan or an Edmond Dantes. There are no supporting characters worthy of comparison to Athos, Porthos, and Aramis. Even the villains are rather boring (not to mention wooden), leaving us with little to really care about in this book. I think author's intended "hook" was supossed to be the mystery about who the Scarlet Pimpernel is, but this was entirely lost by the half-way point, so I found the last half of the book rather unremarkable.
The most redeeming merit of this book is not its enjoyability, but its historical significance. The dual persona of the hero was the inspiration for further variations on the theme, beginning with McCulley's Zorro in the early 20th century and subsequent rise of superheros. It is hard to imagine that such a motif is so recent, but we really do have Orczy to thank for that, and I am truly grateful, for The Mark of Zorro is one of my favorite books. Beyond that, however, my advice is to stick to Dumas, Stevenson, Shellabarger, and Sabatini. They are all far better than this.
Overall grade: C+
Spy thriller, action adventure, and romance all rolled into this classicReview Date: 2008-03-23
One of my favorite fiction stories.Review Date: 2007-11-16
Great service Review Date: 2007-10-11
Amazon.com was easy to use to find the book and order from. The book was everything we hoped and we thank Amazon.com for their prompt professonal service in making the book available to us.
The book was every bit as exciting to read as the movie was to watch.
THANK YOU AMAZON.COM!
Delightful! Review Date: 2007-07-06
Shortly after Marguerite and Sir Percy marry, Marguerite tells Sir Percy of her involvement in the arrest of a certain marquis who had humiliated her brother. Marguerite does not tell her husband the whole story, including that she had no idea her words would be taken out of context and used against the marquis and that she had done everything within her influence to try to prevent the marquis's death at the guillotine. Sir Percy's attitude towards Marguerite changes: he is still the gallant he always was, but a certain coldness and reservation mark his manner. Marguerite had hoped that her husband would not need a full explanation, and that his worshipful devotion towards her would continue unabated. She is hurt by his changed opinion of her and retaliates with pointed sallies at Sir Percy's expense. She is considered one of the cleverest women in all of Europe, and she sharpens her wits by making fun of her husband, whom she wrongfully assumes is too unintelligent to take offense.
It is not until Marguerite partially confides in her husband when her brother's life is threatened that Sir Percy learns the truth of Marguerite's (unintentional) involvement in the marquis's death. Sir Percy repents his false impressions of his wife and vows that he will do everything within his ability to save Marguerite's brother. As Marguerite makes her way up the staircase after this intense communication, Sir Percy actually kisses the stairs where Marguerite had just walked! His worshipful attitude towards her is renewed, and Marguerite for her own part recognizes how much she has loved her husband all along. But is it too late for the lovers? Marguerite was forced by circumstance to reveal information about the Scarlet Pimpernel to an unrelenting French commissioner (an obsessive, Javert-like character) before realizing that the same man is her own husband.
The rest of the book is a clever game of cat and mouse, replete with a happily-ever-after ending (or rather, a happy-for-the-time-being ending, as there are more books in the Scarlet Pimpernel series).
I had seen the movie with Anthony Andrews and Jane Seymour several years ago. Both the book and movie are equally wonderful, though the movie's storyline is a bit different. Anthony Andrews (whom I had a crush on as a young girl after seeing him in a TV miniseries) was beyond perfection in the title role, and of course, Jane Seymour was wonderful as Marguerite.


Good BookReview Date: 2008-05-14
And if you are a Hugh Laurie fan then it is an essential!
Fantastic read!Review Date: 2008-04-24
James Bond meets P.G. Wodehouse in a Terrific Spy TaleReview Date: 2008-04-04
not exactly "House" but very goodReview Date: 2008-04-04
Humor is a strong part of this, and the inner monologue shared with the reader is full of self-deprecating, ironic comments, and the text is rife with send ups of standard cliches. There are a few times he goes over the top with these, but it suits the style and the tone of the book perfectly so those are easily overlooked.
Language is a bit strong for my personal tastes, but certainly in bounds for the setting and the genre.
A strong ending, with a few unexpected twists. Overall a fine novel and I hope to see more from him.
Great Stuff... Hoping for More...Review Date: 2008-03-28
For lack of a better term/category/genre, this is a spy novel. Albeit a pretty funny romp through the world of the CIA, British intelligence, terrorism and arms dealing, it is still at its heart a spy thriller. And I would say it is quite good. A quick and very entertaining read. The main character is a great and witty personality. There is a lot going on here, so it actually falls into the Thinker category too. You're never quite sure who is doing what and to whom. All of this makes for a good read. There is no groundbreaking stuff here, but it still qualifies for my 4 stars as a great entertaining read. You won't be disappointed. And if you're familiar with Mr. Laurie's various dramatic and comedic work, you will like it even more.
The wit of the writer carries through the entire book and I was pleasantly pleased with the application of humor. There is a brief interview with Hugh Laurie in the back of the book in which he is asked what inspired him to write this book. His response was that he had taken a close look at his humdrum life and decided to make up a life. He just wanted to fantasize an adventure.
In my opinion, that is a great way to write a book! Well done, Hugh, well done.

Hoopla-do about not muchReview Date: 2008-05-01
Its complete tripe.
sweet imaginationReview Date: 2008-02-22
Finn Family MoomintrollReview Date: 2007-12-31
Not Free SF ReaderReview Date: 2007-09-03
If those guys aren't odd enough, they have a bunch of friends that are other strange looking creatures. This book is basically about the hijinks they get up to after finding a magic hat, that pretty much looks like what you would expect your garden variety stage magician to be wearing.
However, this particularly piece of millinery actual is the real deal, though, not a stage prop.
Wonderful fun for kids and adults alikeReview Date: 2007-01-23
BTW, these books are great for reading-aloud. And Jansson's delightful pen-and-ink illustrations really bring the Moomins to life.

LOVED IT!Review Date: 2007-09-18
DisappointingReview Date: 2007-01-04
Great Narration, Above Average ContentReview Date: 2006-12-22
A quaint and readable bookReview Date: 2007-03-18
Acquiring a taste for Professor Dr. Moritz-Maria von Igelfeld of the Institute of Romance PhilologyReview Date: 2007-04-23
Of the three books in this trilogy, I enjoyed this one the best. For me, this was 'laugh out loud' humour and I expect those around me were grateful when I resumed more serious lunchtime reading.
A recommended light-hearted read.
Jennifer Cameron-Smith


another awesome britReview Date: 2007-12-13
Battle of the sexes?Review Date: 2007-03-30
Without giving away any real spoilers, I'll say that I love the character development in this book - how Sam comes to share Lucy's desire to have a child, how both characters come to be more sympathetic to each other through the process, and of course the ending that illustrates that real love and forgiveness are possible.
But good heavens, I really hope that if I ever want to have kids I'll prove fertile - this book really shows you all the hoops that reproductive technologies make couples jump through!
A much needed sense of humour for all infertile couples !Review Date: 2005-08-18
First half good, second half BAD.Review Date: 2007-03-16
Also, maybe this shows the male point of view on infertility well, but not the female one. There's so little detail on what the woman actually goes through in a trying to conceive cycle--it's laughable.
If you get it, enjoy the beginning, and don't feel bad about skimming the second half. The shift in tone and characterization is jarring; too bad the author spoiled such a good beginning.
HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAMS AND ALL THATReview Date: 2005-07-20
The processes of human sexuality verge on the absurd at the best of times whatever else can be said about them. When we factor in the exceptional manoeuvres increasingly demanded by a desperate mid-30's childless wife from her less committed husband, culminating in the lurid rituals of IVF, I think it's fair to say that it takes a certain type of writer to deal with such a theme successfully. Ben Elton handles it brilliantly. We are not spared the most graphic or intimate physical and anatomical details, but the comic style Elton adopts really masks a true delicacy of perception. Indeed I'm inclined to say that nobody with less of a sense of humour than the two protagonists show in this book would have been able to see the whole gruesome process through. The humour is very English humour, and I think I know what it's modelled on to a great extent. During the years of the Thatcher Terror, there used to be a hilarious column in the magazine Private Eye purporting to consist of letters from her husband to a friend named Bill. These were written in a very public-school idiom, probably derived basically from P G Wodehouse but influenced by minor literature such as the Molesworth books, familiar also from Oxford common-rooms and similar places of association, and updated more recently into the dialogue of the chattering classes in Islington and similar parts of London, the form in which we find it here. This idiom can take the heaviness out of the most serious situations without trivialising them, and whether or not I'm right about its precise origin in this book that is the way its author tries to use it, and tries very successfully in my own opinion.
The author never speaks to us directly throughout the whole book, using instead the device of diaries written by the husband and wife, much as is done in Julian Barnes's Talking it Over. The device works very well here. Ben Elton is an observer and critic with a particularly acute eye for human behaviour and attitudes, and it helps if he steps back a little from the narrative for that very reason. The incidents in the story are often Rabelaisian and hilarious, but the dilemmas and worse that the characters face are touched in with no little sympathy as well as perceptiveness. The style of writing has even gained a little (dare I say this?) refinement, to its and our general benefit I'd say. The ending is genuinely touching, so on balance 5 stars.
Related Subjects: Movies
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7