Kevin Anderson Books
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65

Used price: $2.50

The Best of the JediReview Date: 2007-09-06
A Great Star Wars ComicReview Date: 2006-12-23
okReview Date: 2005-05-18
I THINK I CANReview Date: 2003-07-22
The Art and coloring are still the older style and get about 2.5. the story, as Tom Veitch tells us is intended to reflect what was revealed in Holocrons that are discovered 1,000's of years later. In particular, they foreshadow what happens to Luke Skywalker in dark empire. This is an intense and serious contribution to the star wars Galaxy, and my version is over 100 pages. I think it is worthwhile, and I did like it better the second time I read it, especially if you later read the Jedi Academy Book Trilogy by Kevin J Anderson, I Jedi and Dark Empire by Dark Horse.
There is also an audio tape version of this comic that is a complete dramatization, rather than just a reading; I am reviewing Audio book ISBN: 1565111990 - In short, the dramatization format can be hard to follow at times, but I thought that overall they did a good job - 3 stars.
A great book!Review Date: 2005-11-08
In this graphic novel we are introduced to Exar Kun, a Jedi whose fascination with the ancient Sith teachings is leading him towards the dark-side. Also, with the ascension of a pair of Sith magicians to the throne of The Empress Teta system, the Republic is moving towards war. Ulic Qel-Droma thinks that he can destroy the menace single-handed, and avoid a bloody showdown between the Sith and the Republic, but what will be the cost?
My twelve-year-old son is a big Star Wars fan, and he picked up this series so that he could keep on learning about the Star Wars universe. Overall, we found this to be a great book. The illustration work is very good, and the story is gripping. We enjoyed the action and the many different creatures and races that are the hallmark of Star Wars.
Yep, we both enjoyed this book, and highly recommend it to you. We highly recommend the entire Tales of the Jedi series!

it was a little confusing but great anywayReview Date: 1998-09-19
Good but Jedi Bounty was a lot better.Review Date: 1998-07-05
Great series!!Review Date: 1998-09-28
Four StarsReview Date: 2007-08-06
A very good book, worth 4 1/2 starsReview Date: 2001-01-06

Not as good as Books 1-6Review Date: 2007-06-05
Worth your moneyReview Date: 1998-06-08
A Very Good BookReview Date: 2003-11-12
Four StarsReview Date: 2007-08-05
A very good book that does credit to the seriesReview Date: 2001-01-05

Used price: $0.01
Collectible price: $18.09

Hmmm, this one was rather boring . . .Review Date: 2004-04-01
The story is about an archeological dig gone bad. Throw in an ancient curse, a search for a missing archeologist, possible human sacrifice (yikes!), then add some bad guy standbys like a drug dealer and the leader of a revolution and sprinkle it with bits of Scully and Mulder and you have yourself a story that falls to Ruins (at least for me). I'm sure it'll appeal to folks interested in archeology (there's lots of techie jargon tossed about), super die-hard X-Philes, and fans of Mitch Pilleggi, AKA Agent Skinner who does a decent job of narrating the story excepting a few bits where his tone takes a turn toward the monotonous.
This is a good book, very interestingReview Date: 2000-11-03
Excellent book for everyone, not just X-PhilesReview Date: 1999-07-14
The best yet!Review Date: 1999-06-18
The best book of the X-Files (in this moment)Review Date: 1999-06-14

Used price: $0.01

Not Free SF ReaderReview Date: 2007-09-04
Fairly ordinary execution, but still somewhat interesting.
Slow start but a page turner from mid book to endReview Date: 1998-11-06
Excellent Science Fiction novel...but you can't have my copyReview Date: 2001-04-10
THE FUGITIVE MEETS BLADE RUNNERReview Date: 1997-06-13
Well done Science FictionReview Date: 1999-12-23

Horrified English TeacherReview Date: 2001-09-02
my 8th grade English class to read, discuss and critique.
Thank heavens I read it first! It is so riddled with grammatical errors, mis-used words and spelling errors that
for me, plowing through it was like listening to a fingernail scratch the blackboard. Both author and publisher should be
ashamed! Rather than having the class read the book, I'm
using it as the basis for a competition. Any student who
wishes to may read the book and make note of all the mistakes.
The one (or ones) who finds the highest number will receive a prize -- a book of course. So I suppose I didn't waste my
money after all.
You gotta love your cowboys!Review Date: 1999-01-07
THIS WONDERFUL BOOK HAS A LOT OF HEART!Review Date: 1998-12-03
A fresh, original story.Review Date: 1998-11-04
A super story ready to be made into a movie!Review Date: 1999-05-17

Used price: $0.01

TO REBECCA of "gotta read it"Review Date: 2003-07-23
shiazas
now my opinion is that this book is very childish and has lot of plot holes. If you are reading this book beacuse of the original TITAN A.E. then DONT. if you r reading this book for fun DONT.
KJ anderson never fails to dissapoint me
An exellent book 2 read...Review Date: 2000-07-04
At times corny, but overall good.Review Date: 2002-03-12
reside on a human drifter colony, New Marrakech, until it is attacked by the Drej. The attack leaves Akima and Ishaq's parental guardian dead, and this motivates the two of them to buy a ship and find work. The couple easily find work transporting goods to Solbrecht, and on their first mission they find trouble. After narrowly escaping death from a criminal kingpin's goons Akima and Ishaq team up with Stith to take down Golbus and to locate acient artifacts that Ishaq's father and Sam Tucker had been hiding.
The plot is original, but doesn't seem like it took a lot of thought to develop, and the dialogue is very "childish" and corny. But I just tried to turn off my brain and enjoy it for what it was, and even though it has a lot of plot holes that didn't stay consistant with the film, I just tried to read it as if it were a totally different story, and I think that if you do the same a lot of the plot holes will not be so evident.
I feel that the people who would enjoy this novel the most are those who are fans of "Titan A.E.", for those who enjoy Science Fiction stories, and for young ones, as there is no real offensive language and almost no violence. Though fans of either of the above mentioned may feel that it's to kiddie to be taken seriously and many may want to laugh at some of the dialogue. Overall, I did enjoy "Akima's Story", and you may enjoy it as well if you keep an open mind. Thanks for reading.
Gotta Read ItReview Date: 2000-08-07
Great story but its better if read before the movie or novelReview Date: 2000-06-15

Used price: $12.95

Great at pointing out Foucault's porblematic political turnReview Date: 2007-01-09
An Important Contribution to Critical TheoryReview Date: 2005-06-30
In short, Foucault was drawn to the radical Islamism of the Ayatollah Khomeini--rather than to the feminist and socialist forces who had helped overthrow the despised Shah--precisely because of his aversion to all modern political institutions and norms, whether liberal or radical. Islamism, which had the appearance of pure, romantic fusion or unity in the will of the people (in essence, an Iranian version of Rousseau's general will), seemed to link the Shi'ite past with a present revolutionary Now. Ironically, just as an unreflexive, orthodox Marxism had blinded an earlier generation of "fellow travelers" to Stalinism, Foucault's own anti-Marxism and anti-feminism--his refusal to identify either with the socialist tradition or with women's liberation--made him blind to the authoritarian strain within Islamism. Although Foucault's defenders, and there are many today, will deny that the great French theorist had any flaws as a social critic, what comes through in Afary and Anderson's narrative is the portrait of an intellectual whose own political isolation and personal arrogance made him susceptible to the worst kind of idealism.
The poststructuralist revolution in theoretical thought, which Foucault more than any other thinker helped lead, has done serious damage to our ability both to comprehend the meaning of historical events and to render sound moral and political judgments concerning their meaning. This, to me, is the implicit lesson of Afary and Anderson's important and indispensable book. This, and the authors' own exemplary conduct as theorists and historians: by scrupulously avoiding polemic, complicating our view of Islam, and maintaining a moral center in their narrative, the authors remind us that, by reaffirming its socialist feminist roots, critical or radical theory can yet serve as an antidote both to Western imperialism on one side and Islamism (or apologia for Islamism) on the other. "Foucault and the Iranian Revolution" is therefore must reading for anyone interested in the state of theory, or the state of the world.
A deeply mistaken account of Foucault's interpretation of IranReview Date: 2005-06-22
The authors claim that Foucault values traditional forms of life over modern ones, and thus embraces (like the radical Islamists) a return to the past. In order to make their case, the authors resort to three strategies. First, they neglect Foucault's own statements about his writings. For instance, the authors insist that he saw ancient Greek sexual life as superior to ours, which Foucault explicitly denies. Second, they engage in egregious misinterpretation. For example, they read Foucault's book on the prisons as a plea for earlier forms of punishment. The first few pages of the prison book, detailing the excruciating torture of an attempted regicide, should be enough to convince anyone of the paucity of that interpretation. Finally, they misread Foucault's own sentences, in one case (p. 16) citing a long quote and then interpreting it as meaning something opposed to what it actually says.
Foucault insisted throughout his life that his work sought to deny the view that history naturally progresses from the worse to the better. The authors seem to think that this means that his view of history was that it moved from the better to the worse. It is harder to imagine a more fundamental mistake in the interpretation of Foucault's work.
All of this is unfortunate, particularly since Foucault, normally an astute observer of events, sorely misread the Iranian revolution. This requires explanation. The authors have provided the resources on which to base such an explanation. However, given their inability to understand even the basics of Foucault's work, the explanation itself will have to await another book.
radical Islamism versus compassionate conservativesReview Date: 2005-07-21
The Authors, Janet Afary and Kevin Anderson, provide a detail overview of Foucault's writings and interviews on Iran. The authors also recount the historical Iranian revolution. And to connect this two, they offer some analysis and arguments in the context of Foucault's larger work.
Foucault's concern largely dealt with power, knowledge and discourse. I haven't read all of Foucault yet and nor have I read much on Iranian revolution. However, I didn't have any problem following the arguments in the book. What I found fascinating about Foucault is his emphasis on human irrationality. I think _Madness and Civilization_ talks about this in details. That is why the authors found it interesting to talk about Foucault's fascinations with martyrdom. They provide some detail background about Shiite (a sect in Islam) rituals and its connection with the revolution. Some of this practices are regarded as controversial in mainstream Islam.
The authors point out that the Iranian leftist and feminist sects were a major part of the movement. However, as we have seen with past revolutions it didn't turn out as we have expected. Radical Islamism got rid of the secular element pretty easily. The book goes into detail how Foucault "got it wrong" and some other interesting issues related with it.
Political analyst are saying that Ahmadinejad's recent 'landslide' victory can be summed up as a revival of the spirit of the Iranian revolution. I am curious how Foucault would have responded to this. Maybe positively? In a way, Foucault was 'anit-modernist'. He talks about 'political spirituality' to be a alternative to modern democratic institution. It is possible, that Ahmadinejad banked on some anti-American / anit-Western sentiment. What does that mean for radical Islamism which have to deal with compassionate conservatives?
Fetishism and cultural imperialism, Foucault's missionReview Date: 2005-07-12

Used price: $38.30
Collectible price: $31.99

Wonderful Series, Ending not as good as other books.Review Date: 2008-07-17
However I can't help be be dissappointed with the last book. He wraps everything up too well, too many people happy - by the end I was looking for the Ewoks swinging through the jungle with music playing.
Too many things in this book just "happened" to make everything work out. Things that were not evident in any other book. I think he could have use the previous books to hint at some of these upcoming events or "powers" but he saved it all for last.
So to me it's a little too happy and convienient how everything worked out.
At long last, the Saga end. Worth reading for fans of Anderson.Review Date: 2008-07-14
Having said that, it's an interesting way of writing and gets in a lot of different scenarios and points of view. Also, Kevin Anderson has been very consistent in the way characters act, the storyline and this final volume does wrap things up quite nicely. I've made a point of mentioning consistency because when Anderson co-wrote the final Dune volume, it was very poorly written indeed. I have a feeling Anderson gets involved in too many books at the same time.
I do like the jacket though. Very stylish.
hoo-rah!!Review Date: 2008-07-13
A good ending for the series, though not without some flawsReview Date: 2008-07-10
Also, much of the book required a greater suspension of disbelief as the author continued the past trend of having every notable character in the series meet each other at least once. I am happy the series is over but it was definitely not a waste of time to have followed it these past 6 years. Be warned though, the ending definitely leaves the universe open to a sequel.
An outstanding finish to the SagaReview Date: 2008-07-05
You will also be glad to hear that KJA is considering doing further writing in this universe at a later time too.
Used price: $0.01

Assemblers of InfinityReview Date: 2003-04-14
Other than that, I wouldn't necessarily say that this is a bad attempt at hard science fiction, just a really mediocre one. Most of the cast of characters is passable, but the writing leaves a lot to be desired. Rather than trying to end each chapter on a high note, the authors instead usually break with a character chatting or brushing their hair or something. Most of the dialogue doesn't really sound like people who are actually facing a dangerous crisis. However, I can't deny that the central idea of alien nanotechnology is pretty cool, and the climactic sequence is well written, although some of the mysteries set forth earlier aren't really explained satisfactorily. I'm feeling generous today, so three stars.
Best Pure Science Fiction book I've read in years.Review Date: 2000-06-08
Wonderful Hard SF look at nanotechnology, very vivid.Review Date: 1999-10-10
It waas GreatReview Date: 1999-07-09
Wild ride on teeeeeny little carsReview Date: 2001-09-11
And Anderson/Beason do not disappoint. Their basic approach is that mankind is on the edge of understanding nanotech, but not there yet.. and this can lead to disastrous consequences. When they are presented with alien nanotech.. and these aliens DEFINITELY know what their doing.. our ignorance and initial fumblings create a uninterrupted tension.
I'm a sucker for conclusive endings.. and this story doesn't have one... and I applaud them for it. It fits the story. You'll
enjoy the story, don't worry.
Related Subjects:
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
Why is this the best? Veitch and Anderson's writing plays off each other, presenting the best of each and compensating for their weaknesses. The art in the first five chapters is fantastic, as are Dave Dorman's covers. The early TotJ stories have just enough implied backstory to hint at the larger world but it never leaves the reader confused. Korriban is one of my favorite Star Wars locations, and it was created here in crisp detail with millennia of history only hinted at.
What is lacking? The art in the sixth chapter is not so hot. The narration can be a bit comic-booky. Veitch was not involved in the subsequent volumes of TotJ, which are hit-and-miss. The Sith War is ultimately disappointing, but the Redemption of Ulic Qel-Droma was a fine coda to the series.