Movies Books
Related Subjects: DVD Titles
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250


Jhaeman's ReviewsReview Date: 2004-06-20
Pass it off...Review Date: 2003-02-14
A little bit about the book is it takes place in Sunnydale, where all theh "supernatural" stuff goes down. Willow is the library nerd, she's in there all the time. She meets this guy over the internet. Their friendship grew and she fell in love with him, so they were going to meet. But there was something she didn't know about him and when she finds out she is going to be shocked!
i liked this buffy book!Review Date: 2002-07-29
SEASON THREE'S BEST EPISODES, BUFFY'S BEST NOVELIZATION.Review Date: 2001-07-30
"I do doodle. You too, you do doodle too!"Review Date: 2001-04-20


ONE OF THE GREATEST BOOKS I HAVE READ!Review Date: 2003-06-04
One of the best in the series so far!Review Date: 2002-06-25
A good read, keeps you guessing to the endReview Date: 2002-05-14
It took me a while to get into it, but once the action started I couldn't put it down! The plot is full of twists and keeps you guessing untill the end. This book has more of a mystery element to it and I like the way the present day story fits in with flashbacks to Angel's past.
It centres around a young, pretty hollywood actress - Whitney Tyler who stars in her own T.V series - Dark Midnight about a female vampire detective. However, the actress soon starts receiving death treats from a cult who believe she is a real live vampire. Angel is called on to get to the bottom of the mysterious threats and deaths - while protecting the woman from further harm. Angel somehow feels Whitney Tyler is very familliar, and he begins to have flashbacks to his past. The actress is identical to a young woman the evil Angelus fought on The Handsome Jack, a ship, hundreds of years ago.
Angel must somehow find what links the two very different women together, and he must do it fast before even more people die at the hands of an evil creature from his past...
I really enjoyed this book. The plot is gripping and is very well thought out - if you enjoy mystery stories this is the Angel book for you. You can also rely on Cordelia and Doyle to bring some humour and comic moments into the book too.
Acting the PartReview Date: 2004-06-14
Intertwined with Whitney's story is Angel's memory of Moira O'Braonain, who he first encountered in his Angelus the Vampire Pirate days (bet you didn't know that Angel used to swashbuckle a bit). While taking over a ship, Angelus and Darla run into Moira, a deadly fighter who Angel kills. And then has to kill several times over. Whitney and Moira are nearly identical, but it will take time for Angel to work out the connection, and people around Whitney keep dying unpleasantly.
Mel Odom does a great job on his first Angel novel, capturing not only Angel's character perfectly, but the interactions between Cordelia and Doyle as well. The make an interesting counter to what is building between Whitney and Angel. Despite being pure fantasy, Odom's style adds the touch of believability that is necessary if a reader is to stay interested.
This story comes from the short period of time when every Angel story seems to depend on undoing the vampire's actions during the Angelus period, where amends and redemption had a very specific meaning. Unfortunately, the constant flashbacks wear thin after a while. Redemption spends as much time in the past as it does in the present and, despite Odom's writing stills, I'm beginning to twitch every time I see Angelus in a frilly shirt.
Good story, good dialogue, some weaknesses in narrativeReview Date: 2003-08-02
The other problem that I had was with Doyle's character meeting up with a loan shark and a seer. Both of these characters were interesting to a point, and the scenes were well written, but they ultimately had nothing to do with the story. They could have been written out completely and the rest of the story would have remained the same. In fact, the loan shark storyline is completely left dangling. He forgives Doyle's loan as long as Doyle agrees to introduce him to Angel. Interesting, you might think. And then you would read the rest of the book wondering what business this loan shark would have with Angel. But you would never find out, because Odom never goes back to this subplot. It is just left dangling at the end. Very disappointing.
But getting past the occasional misplaced word or sentence and the subplot that goes nowhere, there was a lot of good in this book as well. For the most part the characters read like those in the show (which isn't always the case in tv tie-in novels)and the rest of the plot is pretty tight. The introductory scene hooks you right in, and for a while at least you are intrigued by the mystery woman who Angel had met and fought over a century ago and who is now not only still alive and well, but doesn't seem to recognize him.
I bought this book at a garage sale for a quarter. I got my money's worth. I don't know if I would feel the same if I had picked it up at cover price.


So awesome!Review Date: 2006-07-16
Phoebe thinks she has found the love of her life but has she? Read on to find out.
I would definitely recommend buying this book!
Charmed? Not this book.Review Date: 2005-11-29
Book's flaws: The plot was rickety-thin and not very informative on what the story's main focus is about.
Secondly, it is mentioned that the sisters have to go back in time, to help their "innocent", who happens to be Niall, the mysterious stranger, which only happens to be for a very short while and only 2 of the sisters do go back in time.
Thirdly (and the most major incomprehension), I don't understand how could Diana and the Driuds to be so possibly powerful that they can summon Niall 1500 years in the past, to the future, just like that. And what Diana wants is to be very powerful???? When she herself doesn't not have much power?!?!?! The fact that she and her group of hypnotized human-sheep could summon someone who is practically an unknown legend in the past, to their own time, is downright hard to believe that all she wants is more power (a baby), with that "unknown legend". Not only does it not make any sense at all, (even in the Charmed universe), the idea of it is far-fetched.
And the ending was predictable AND too, unbelievably simple, which ruined the intrigue of the whole book. Also, at the end, some parts of the story were kind of messed up, going off the main storyline, and might make the reader think at the end, "That's it?!"
Oh yes, there is no major battle, which is rather disappointing as these kind of typical intrigues in a Charmed book makes it worth reading. The Legacy Of Merlin is not.
But despite these major faults that is in this story, I still enjoyed it. If you like Charmed, but don't be surprised if your find yourself getting annoyed with the confusion and blunders in this book.
Great BookReview Date: 2005-08-16
So the next day Piper see's Niall and this other woman doing some kind of ritual. So she goes and warns her sisters. Prue Made friennds with an older woman Mrs. Jefferies while she buys fruit from her stand. Piper warns them and Phoebe doesn't believe her. So thats when we find out that Niall is from 1400 years ago. He is the son of Merlin. And that woman is his friends Diana.
The next morning prue goes to get some fruit but Mrs. Jefferies isn't there. Her and Piper go into her house but doesn't find her. So they go to Diana's and She hurts Niall and Phoebe. The Deal Is if Niall doesn't make a baby with Diana by Midnight he will die. So Prue And Piper go back to Nialls time to get a spell Off Merlin. He gives it them and they go back to present time. But Niall wants to go back so hoebe says goodbye to hime and the sisters go back Home.
Ps this book was so good I read it in a day
Great BookReview Date: 2004-12-28
I also like the legend of Merlin and King Arthur and the Lady of the Lake, you know, so this was the perfect book. Charmed+King Arthur Legends=A Book I REALLY like!
If you're a Charmed fan, this is a really great book. I'm actually reading more books in this series.
Happy Charmed,
Kat
merlinReview Date: 2004-06-04

Used price: $0.15

Rebel, RebelReview Date: 2007-07-18
Wrangling teen idols to make a classic movie
If you're into movies, and classics, or more specifically, misunderstood classics, and you have any interest in James Dean, then Lawrence Frascella and Al Weisel's Live Fast, Die Young: The Wild Ride of Making Rebel Without a Cause is required reading.
Of course, as a reformed "Deaner" who's read every biography about the icon, much of the information about 1950s film star James Dean, whose died in a car accident only days after completing his third movie, isn't new.
Yet when woven with biographical accounts of Rebel co-stars Natalie Wood, Sal Mineo, and director Nicholas Ray, Live Fast, Die Young becomes compelling reading, mostly through its swift and meticulously researched details (shown in 50 pages of bibliographical notes) that take us sequentially through the pre-production, daily shooting schedule, ups and downs and sometimes lurid behind the scenes drama that took place through the making of a pivotal film that defined the "teenager" in pop culture, and established post-war adolescent angst as a social phenomenon.
Dean, known for his moody temperament, over-the-top method acting, and palpable inferiority complex to contemporary Marlon Brando, gets his now-famous behaviors contextualized. But what has been forgotten among the piles of gossip magazines through the decades, is how Dean, working closely with director Ray, helped shape Rebel into its unique teen-focused originality.
Commentary from surviving actors like Corey Allen, who played Buzz, the gang nemesis of Jim Stark, Dean's character, offers a grounded perspective to the mythologized stories of Dean, Wood, and Mineo, who all died under tragic circumstances. Allen recounts the competitive atmosphere for camera time (Nick Adams being the biggest ham), and the choreography of the opening knife fight (originally shot in black and white, studio executives pushed to move to the then-new color Cinemascope after watching a rough cut. The entire first scene was re-shot).
The three main character's lives reflected strongly on their private lives at the time. Judy's (Wood) advanced sexuality, Jim Stark's (Dean) longing to befriend Buzz rather than fight him, and Plato's (Mineo) adoration of Stark.
Authors Frascella and Weisel, who both thank their male partners in the book's acknowledgements, are therefore presumably gay. But they show a restrained tone in laying proof to the bisexuality of star Dean, focusing on the actual events surrounding the film's subtle successes at revealing the eroticism lurking under the surface of malcontent violent kids.
It's Sal Mineo who shines when he realizes he is, in effect, cinema's first gay teenager. Never exactly in the closet, Mineo's Plato becomes an icon of shy sensitivity and undefined sexuality.
As the book winds through the travails of filming a revolutionary film under the pressures of studio executives, director Ray's own complex personal problems are no less dramatic, ranging from alcoholism to the shame of enduring an affair between his second wife, who seduced his son from his first marriage, to his illegal affair with a teenage Natalie Wood (who was also having a sexual affair with co-star Dennis Hopper).
That the film ever managed to become the classic it was lies largely to this rare collaborative process that Ray nurtured in a time when Hollywood -barely over the dread of McCarthyism and its related blacklist- was anything but collaborative.
While often times abusive and erratic, and even boastful - years later he would take credit for scenes and ideas proposed by screenwriters and actors- Ray is shown as a maverick who made his mark, despite his eventual downfall, by having created more than a great film, but a document of a culture at a pivotal moment. Frascella and Weisel's thorough work shows readers how it happened.
The Definitive Rebel Book, Now and ForeverReview Date: 2006-05-25
The one complaint I have about this book is that at times I think it relied too much on unproven sensationalism about James Dean. Particularly a passage in which an Actor claims that James and Jack Simmons were hitting on him, but what sounded like a perfect innocent invitation to visit the house they were living in to me.
But this is a book that should be on any Rebel fans bookshelf.
The definitive book on the film.Review Date: 2006-12-12
This book is about the making of that movie. It features interviews with the surviving members of the cast and crew and the authors had firsthand access to both personal and studio archives.
This is a rather remarkable book in that it was written so long after the film. It reads like the authors knew and were involved with the people making the movie it tells an extraordinary story. It's very well done, so far as I am concerned, the definitive film on the movie.
Close to the KnivesReview Date: 2006-03-29
One thing leads to another, organically speaking. The book convinces me that the central mainspring of the success of REBEL was not, perhaps, James Dean, but Natalie Wood, desperate to prove she wasn't a child any longer, throwing herself at director Nicholas Ray who, in a crazy display of grand seigneurial privilege, took her as his lover. Was Wood feeling any sexual excitement in this union, or was she just trying to get back at her horrible mother, Maria Gurdin? Ever since Suzanne Finstad's biography of Wood revealed this affair with Nick Ray, together with the story of Wood being raped by a still-living Hollywood leading man, it's hard to look at REBEL without thinking of Judy as the victim of sexual abuse "acting out" her fantasies of sexual liberation and pleasure, but not able to really get any for herself.
I appreciated the care the authors took in interviewing just about everyone connected to the movie, including the gang members, some of whom you hardly notice in the movie. But as it happens, and I wonder if someday the extra footage will turn up, many of the gang members had bigger scenes with lots of dialogue, when the shooting started Warners wasn't going to pay for anything but black and white, and then a third of the way through they decided to scrap the b/w footage and go with color. They threw the baby out with the bathwater in this one, for wouldn't you like to see that black and white material? Wonder where it is now? The authors tracked down Steffi Sidney, who was sort of the Tori Spelling of her day in that her dad was a well known Hollywood institution who managed to get her jobs just by laying down the hammer. He wasn't a producer like Aaron Spelling, but even more fearsome, one of LA's top gossip columnists, a man called Sidney Skolsky. Steffi is particularly observant about the day to day shooting of REBEL, and her pointed comments are always trenchant and super-funny.
I hear today in the news that Warners has unearthed test footage of Marlon Brando playing scenes from a version of REBEL WITHOUT A CAUSE that never got made, seven or eight years before the present one! And that they will be issuing this screentest as an extra to the DVD of STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE! I bet the authors of LIVE FAST, DIE YOUNG are kicking themselves that they didn't get to view this footage--indeed they don't seem to have been aware such a test even existed, or that the movie was almost made in 1948! Otherwise they are an omniscient pair indeed.
Best of the BestReview Date: 2006-03-10

Used price: $11.00

An exotic and pleasurable tropical adventureReview Date: 2005-07-12
high on the sailsReview Date: 2005-06-20
his slumming angel rose from Rimbaud, fedora from
Neruda, and sea legs from Melville's grammar. Reading
Movies on the Sails you're suddenly swimming in the
middle of a ghost who smiles at you, and with her long
lips or lashes invites you on a surprise-filled
pas-de-deux cruise prospecting for thighs, I mean
dice, dice, that is, that is, Breton's objective
chance, that is, the key to all your unfolding
phantasies. You're suddenly dressed in the colors of a
Rousseau-like jungle and all the various animals on
view are the people you know transformed in their
symbols, regarding you with friendly and luxurious
eyes and fawning all over you. But, more, the Muse of
Language has chosen Larrain as her troubadour and
anywhere out of this world he wants to sail, we sail
too, and for the first time in a long time we don't
say no. This book, despite the secret craving I've had
to see it as a movie by Bunuel and Dali, should never
be made into a film unless it were a singular private
movie for each one of you who reads it entrapped by
its rich and various bewitchments, a long desired
movie your phantasy lover sings to you in fado and
from which you never wish to recover.
Movies On The SailsReview Date: 2004-02-12
Movies On The SailsReview Date: 2004-02-10
Movies On The SailsReview Date: 2004-02-10

Used price: $23.16

Painstakingly researched, not painstakingly writtenReview Date: 2008-04-07
But with that said, it was interesting to see how Hollywood has changed over the last four decades. It was worth my time, even if it was a challenge to keep everything straight.
A very clever & detailed look at the birth of the New HollywoodReview Date: 2008-03-23
Transitions from Failure to CommunicateReview Date: 2008-05-07
If you are a movie insider, this may be too "Old Hat" for you. But, if you were busy being part of the solution, and not part of the problem, and really relate to The Big Chill, then here are some pictures from our revolution and one from the changing of the Old School guard. (In its sheer longevity and incorporation into the cultural venacular, this reviewer mourns the non-nomination and therefore non-inclusion of Cool Hand Luke)
Harris' well-researched and footnoted view tells the tales of the making and marketing of the movies, and the politics involved, in a manner accessible for the masses. See also The Academy Awards: The Complete Unofficial History.
Along the way, we encounter the moods of Minneapolis moviegoers, a 25 year old up-and-coming Roger Ebert, and Father Andrew Greeley in a former gig as reviewer for the National Catholic Reporter.
If it's news to you that Robert Redford was originally preferred over Dustin Hoffman as Benjamin Braddock, or that Mrs. Robinson's song started life as Mrs. [Eleanor] Roosevelt, this book's for you!
/TundraVision, Amazon Reviewer
excellent bookReview Date: 2008-03-31
Fascinating History of five films at a turning point in American CinemaReview Date: 2008-03-29


Sin City = MurderReview Date: 2007-12-02
An overall decent and quick read.
Two great investigations with perfect follow-throughReview Date: 2007-08-20
A Very Fun ReadReview Date: 2004-07-26
The best way to get your CSI fix when it isn't on TVReview Date: 2004-05-17
The CSI crew find themselves involved in 2 unique cases: the disappearance of a loving wife named Lynn Pierce and the brutal murder of an exotic dancer named Jenna Patrick. The book splits the cases with team leader Gil Grissom taking the case of the missing woman and Catherine Willows (Grissom's unofficial second in command) somewhat reluctantly taking the stripper murder (as CSI fans will know Catherine herself used to be a stripper)
Suspicion grows in both cases as the teams find clues that lead them to believe that the people that were closest to the respective victims (The woman's husband in the disappearance case, and Patrick's close friend and co-worker Tera Jameson in the dancer case) are the ones that may be the most responsible for these ghastly crimes. But can they really prove their hunches?
Sin City is a great read for those who are CSI fans and fans of mystery alike. It takes the CSI TV experience and gives it an innovative written form. Capturing the style and dry wit that has made the show a bonafide hit (especially the very sly game of name switching in the stripper case) is what makes the book worth every penny.
Still a terrific representation of the showReview Date: 2005-01-24
Las Vegas earns its notorious nickname when a man's wife disappears and their neighbors suspect the husband, particularly since the wife gave them a secreted cassette tape with the husband threatening to dismember her recorded on it. Meanwhile, a stripper is murdered in the lapdance room at Dream Dolls (where Catherine used to work) and the surveillance cameras point to her boyfriend, who was not only under a restraining order, but also claims he was home watching the game at the time.
Sin City fulfills on all levels and the reader profits from the experience that author Collins has in writing for already-existing television characters. The voices are perfect and one can go from watching the television series to reading the novels seamlessly, which is likely the best compliment one can give to a genre that gains little respect from the literary community but has been vastly appreciated by TV watchers and readers alike for decades.


Quick, easy read for those rainy daysReview Date: 2003-07-31
Good for a quiet afternoon, not great fictionReview Date: 2006-03-20
Eventually the teens discover that the local UFO newspaper publisher isn't just some weird guy, he's the evil stowaway that they were told crashed the ship all those years ago and that he was remote controlling Adam when Clean Slate was destroyed. This guy can teleport himself, and Max learns to do so as well. Dupris (the bad alien) has searched for 50 years for one of the three Stones of Midnight the homeworld has as a sort of power source, he gets the ring (containing one) the gang has. Working with/through the consciousness Max and the gang try to send Dupris back home to his enemies through a wormhole, adopting his appearance as part of their efforts. They manage to send him through with the bounty hunters but discover to their dismay that it was Alex they sent through, the real Dupris escapes with the ring.
Pretty GoodReview Date: 2000-05-17
This book was so good and so many things happened.Review Date: 2000-07-10
There's a very evil control freak out there ...Review Date: 2001-06-03

Used price: $4.95

Totally awesome!Review Date: 2004-05-23
A comprehensive lexicon of the best decade ever!Review Date: 2005-01-03
Yes, the 80's were the Reagan years, the year AIDS entered our vocabulary, MTV, back when it was good, VCRs and thus the video rental boom, the War on Drugs, Yuppies, and given her longevity and legendary status, Madonna. Love or hate her, you gotta admit she was the biggest star of the 80's-sorry Michael Jackson and Prince. But we lost a lot of people who made it big back then. John Lennon, Orson Welles, Mae West, and Alfred Hitchcock, to name a few. And games and pastimes such as Trivial Pursuit, Rubik's Cube, classic arcade hits like Pacman, Frogger, and Q*bert.
The list of 80speak, inspired by valley girl talk, stuff from TV shows, "
In the music section, included are special text sections on Michael Jackson, Duran Duran, Culture Club, Wham!, Madonna, Prince, and others who were essentially 80's figures. The Billboard chart figures for them are also included. However, the section on We Are The World, which lists the reasons for why the artists sang, is a bit jokey, making me wonder if the event's impact isn't as big as it is now.
The list of the top music videos, hit songs, and movies of the decade.
I'll list the Top Five of each:
Music videos:
1. Eurythmics: "Sweet Dreams"
2. Buggles, "Video Killed the Radio Star"
3. `til tuesday "Voices Carry"
4. Duran Duran, "Hungry Like The Wolf"
5. Madonna, "Material Girl."
Quintessentially 80s songs:
1. Prince and the Revolution: "Let's Go Crazy"
2. Kajagoogoo: "Too Shy"
3. Animotion: "Obsession"
4. Asia: "Heat of the Moment"
5. Simple Minds: "Don't You (Forget About Me)"
Quintessentially 80s movies
Ultimate: The Breakfast Club
1. Risky Business
2. Airplane!
3. Raiders of the Lost Ark
4. Flashdance
5. Purple Rain
I'm not sure about the top two entries, but of the ones I really liked, Dirty Dancing came in at #10, Fast Times at Ridgemont High at #19, Ghostbusters right behind it, Back to the Future at #38, insultingly way behind at #62 instead of being in the Top Five, both Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi-like, I'm so sure-and Gremlins at #70. There are sublists of funny movies, hottest movies, horror, action, camp, overrated and underrated movies. And things aren't complete without a small section on the Brat Pack, i.e. the stars of the Breakfast Club. But yes, the 80's were also a decade where the teen market was exploited in a major way, via comedies and horror flicks. The same market is being mined right now, but the output today makes the 80's oeuvre like Oscar winners. And movies that were PG got an extra edge with that PG-13 rating, where there was more violence and other stuff in non-R movies.
Of the TV shows I watched regularly, The A-Team came in at #11, Diff'rent Strokes at #34, my brother watched Knight Rider religiously (#54). And come to think of it, I don't think I ever watched any of the so-called "Disease of the Week TV movies."
The appendix in the back lists the top Academy Award, Golden Globe, Grammy, and MTV winners, as well as a list of who sang in Live Aid, in order.
I find myself in somewhat of a midlife crisis, as much of the music I'm trying to get is stuff from that era that I'm still missing. Hey, I had to undergo the transition from cassettes to CDs unlike many Gen Y whippersnappers out there!
Overall rating: Even though I wasn't cool with the movie stuff, I found it like, totally tubular, in a major way. Done with this review, now it's off to play Pacman, or maybe listen to some Cyndi Lauper or watch some Gremlins or Ghostbusters.
Calling All Children of the 80'sReview Date: 2004-01-15
This will be a great gift for anyone who was a TV child in the 80's. If you're a child of the 80's, you should get it for yourself.
It wasn't exactly what I expected, but not badReview Date: 2005-02-13
However there were numerous mentions of homosexual issues and quite a few political comments that I could have done without. I find it tiring when an author grinds his axe about personal issues as much as this one has done. A chapter would have been fine and totally understandale, but the consistent focus on the emerging gay culture wasn't what I was looking for.
A Total Time Warp Into the Greatest Decade In History!!!Review Date: 2004-07-01

Used price: $0.91
Collectible price: $10.00

Fascinating and well-written book.Review Date: 2007-12-15
Mmm, evil Kira!Review Date: 2007-01-01
I was disappointed that evil Garak is actually not in the book much and is just a minor character. Instead this 2-volume story focuses on the female characters of the parallel universe. This story takes place sometime before the DS9 characters rediscover the parallel universe.
It details the backstabbing political intrigues involved as Kira maneuvers for ever more power within the Klingon-Cardassian Empire, which in the parallel universe succeeded in crushing the former Terran Empire thanks to our universe's James T. Kirk having earlier convinced the parallel universe's Spock to spread a pacifist message there.
But there are others vying for the same power that Kira wants, or seeking to keep her from it. Among them are Deanna Troi, who occupies a position of great influence as lover of Worf, head of the Empire. Also Enabran Tain, head of the Obsidian Order, who sends his crack Terran assassin Agent Seven on a mission to infiltrate Kira's power base. And Tain's disgruntled rival Gul Dukat, who also seeks to regain some of his former power.
I thought the first of the two books was great, as we get LOTS of evil Kira, plus the cool spy intrigues of Agent Seven. Book 2 on the other hand.... well, I'll write a review for that one soon too, but just let me say I thought it wasn't quite as good.
But I still LOVE the mirror universe and wish they would write MORE stories taking place there. It's got a lot more gritty atmosphere and has the possibility to tell some very edgy stories.
So should you get this book? Sure, it's just plain a lot of fun. -- But don't get your hopes up too high for a brilliant conclusion. Just sit back and enjoy the ride (especially this first volume).
A must-readReview Date: 2004-08-21
One of the best.Review Date: 2002-10-14
It would be hard to do better.
Star Trek Dark Passions I of II - Absolutely stunning!Review Date: 2004-05-23
With this small duology, Susan Wright took the rather apropos approach of building upon the known and unknown characters in the Star Trek Deep Space Nine mirror universe episodes and created an extraordinary story that actually takes place prior to start of the series, giving her the advantage of having all of the characters to use and giving her the opportunity to create a much more original story to include killing certain characters off. This is an extremely powerful story that involves the majority of the female characters in the current Star Trek universe, proving their "mettle" so to speak and using them to perfection.
The only true complaint I would lodge about this duology falls more into place with the decisions of those at Pocket Books than with the author and that is the fact that this "novel" was broken into two books. Considering the rather standard sized text and the fact that the first book is only 232 pages and the second is 200 pages, this could've and should've been one novel instead of an obvious ploy to ply an extra $6.99 out of "passionate" Star Trek readers; bad on the powers that be at Pocket Books.
The cover art for this novel makes this and the second novel that much more intriguing considering the originality of the story.
The Premise:
As it might spoil the story a bit I won't delve too deeply into the premise of this wonderful story. Suffice it to say, this story involves the majority of the major female characters from "The Next Generation," "Deep Space Nine" and "Voyager" in extremely enlightening roles carrying an extremely original story to fruition through healthy amounts of intrigue and action...
Overall, I highly recommend this and the second book in this small duology to any and all fans of Star Trek fiction and especially to those that thoroughly enjoyed the mirror universe episodes on Star Trek Deep Space Nine. {ssintrepid}
Related Subjects: DVD Titles
More Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250
By Yvonne Navarro (1999), based on teleplays "I, Robot . . . You, Jane" by Ashley Gable & Thomas A. Swyden, "Phases" by Rob DesHotel & Dean Batali, and "Dead Man's Party" by Marti Noxon
RATING: 4/5 Stakes
SETTING: Seasons One through Three
CAST APPEARANCES: Willow, Oz, Xander, Buffy, Giles, Jenny Calendar, Moloch, Dave, Fritz, Larry, Cordelia, Gib Cain, Angel, Joyce, Principal Snyder, Devon, Pat, Jonathan
BACK-OF-THE-BOOK SUMMARY: "When Buffy the Vampire Slayer arrived in Sunnydale, she befriended a bookish, insecure girl named Willow. As a Slayerette, Will uses her computer prowess for good, hacking into electronic government files and researching obscure rituals on the Web. But Willow's love life is severely lacking, consisting of an unfulfilled crush on her friend Xander and a short-lived fling with a deadly demon she met over the Internet. Through her often life-threatening experiences with the Slayer, Willow gains the confidence to just be herself in the peer pressure-filled world of high school. And when her first real boyfriend, Oz, turns out to be a bit . . . unsual . . . in his own right, Willow is just the girl to prove that love really is blind . . . and a little scary."
REVIEW
Volume One of the Willow Files is one of the best Buffy novelizations to date. The book adapts one episode from each of the first three seasons of the show, with the stories tied together with an original and very well done framing sequence that consists of Willow's journal entries.
Season One episode "I, Robot . . . You, Jane" tells the story of Willow's crush on a boy named Malcolm that she met over the Internet. As can only happen in Sunnydale, the boy turns out to be an ancient demon named Moloch the Corruptor. This was the first episode of the series to center a plot around Willow, and in it we see both her insecurity and her strength. Yvonne Navarro does a good job of adopting the humor of the original script, and she adds more background into how Moloch came into being.
Season Two episode "Phases" is the first revelation that Oz is actually a werewolf. It's an average episode, with the high points being the agonizingly/delightfully slow development of Oz's and Willow's relationship, the jealousy we see Willow and Xander having for each other, and some good moments between Angelus and Buffy. It's almost hard not to cheer out-loud when Willow steels her courage and kisses Oz for the first time.
The final episode adapted is the Season Three episode "Dead Man's Party," which has two main plots: Buffy's return to Sunnydale after running away and a mask that raises zombies. The zombie plot is rather banal, but the tension and drama that arises from Buffy's return is worth the price of reading the story--suffice it to say, Buffy isn't welcomed with open arms.
All in all, Navarro had one strong story and two average episodes to adapt. She came through with flying colors, as the adaptations retain the humor and drama of the originals. The framing sequences are far more interesting than those in other Buffy novelizations, making this book one of the better ones to pick up.
(c) (...)